Skip to main content

Rapid Response Systems and the Septic Patient

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Textbook of Rapid Response Systems

Abstract

Sepsis remains the leading cause of death in the ICU. An early, aggressive strategy to identify the onset of septic shock as early as possible in order to begin therapy is associated with a significant reduction in mortality. Specifically, timely administration of appropriate antibiotics lowers mortality at least 7–12%. Unfortunately, even with timely recognition of septic shock, administration of antibiotic therapy can take several hours. A rapid response system can significantly shorten this time, particularly if a pharmacist is a core member of the team. Additionally, a rapid response system can shorten time to hemodynamic support, fluid resuscitation, and transfer to a dedicated ICU setting—all of which can further lower mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001;29:1303–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1546–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Adhikari NK, Fowler RA, Bhagwanjee S, Rubenfeld GD. Critical care and the global burden of critical illness in adults. Lancet. 2010;376:1339–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sundararajan V, Macisaac CM, Presneill JJ, Cade JF, Visvanathan K. Epidemiology of sepsis in Victoria, Australia. Crit Care Med. 2005;33:71–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Annane D, Aegerter P, Jars-Guincestre MC, Guidet B. Current epidemiology of septic shock: the CUB-Rea network. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2003;168:165–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Harrison DA, Welch CA, Eddleston JM. The epidemiology of severe sepsis in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, 1996 to 2004: secondary analysis of a high quality clinical database, the ICNARC Case Mix Programme Database. Crit Care. 2006;10:R42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Hall MJ, Williams SN, DeFrances CJ, Golosinskiy A. Inpatient care for septicemia or sepsis: a challenge for patients and hospitals. NCHS Data Brief. 2011;1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bates DW, Yu DT, Black E, et al. Resource utilization among patients with sepsis syndrome. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2003;24:62–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chalupka AN, Talmor D. The economics of sepsis. Crit Care Clin. 2012;28:57–76 .vi

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lagu T, Rothberg MB, Nathanson BH, Pekow PS, Steingrub JS, Lindenauer PK. The relationship between hospital spending and mortality in patients with sepsis. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:292–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB, et al. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of chest physicians/society of critical care medicine. Chest. 1992;101:1644–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Trzeciak S, Dellinger RP, Parrillo JE, et al. Early microcirculatory perfusion derangements in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: relationship to hemodynamics, oxygen transport, and survival. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:88–98 .e1-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Brealey D, Brand M, Hargreaves I, et al. Association between mitochondrial dysfunction and severity and outcome of septic shock. Lancet. 2002;360:219–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gutierrez G, Comignani P, Huespe L, et al. Central venous to mixed venous blood oxygen and lactate gradients are associated with outcome in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:1662–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S, et al. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1368–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yealy DM, Kellum JA, Huang DT, et al. A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014;370:1683–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Marshall JC, Maier RV, Jimenez M, Dellinger EP. Source control in the management of severe sepsis and septic shock: an evidence-based review. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:S513–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE, et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:1589–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gaieski DF, Mikkelsen ME, Band RA, et al. Impact of time to antibiotics on survival in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in whom early goal-directed therapy was initiated in the emergency department. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:1045–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Esteban A, Frutos-Vivar F, Ferguson ND, et al. Sepsis incidence and outcome: contrasting the intensive care unit with the hospital ward. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1284–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lundberg JS, Perl TM, Wiblin T, et al. Septic shock: an analysis of outcomes for patients with onset on hospital wards versus intensive care units. Crit Care Med. 1998;26:1020–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Smith GB, Prytherch DR, Meredith P, Schmidt PE, Featherstone PI. The ability of the National Early Warning Score (NEWS) to discriminate patients at risk of early cardiac arrest, unanticipated intensive care unit admission, and death. Resuscitation. 2013;84:465–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jaderling G, Bell M, Martling CR, Ekbom A, Bottai M, Konrad D. ICU admittance by a rapid response team versus conventional admittance, characteristics, and outcome. Crit Care Med. 2013;41:725–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Jones D, Duke G, Green J, et al. Medical emergency team syndromes and an approach to their management. Crit Care. 2006;10:R30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sarani B, Brenner SR, Gabel B, et al. Improving sepsis care through systems change: the impact of a medical emergency team. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008;34:179–82 .25

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Miano TA, Powell E, Schweickert WD, Morgan S, Binkley S, Sarani B. Effect of an antibiotic algorithm on the adequacy of empiric antibiotic therapy given by a medical emergency team. J Crit Care. 2012;27:45–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Babak Sarani MD, FACS, FCCM .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maluso, P., Sarani, B. (2017). Rapid Response Systems and the Septic Patient. In: DeVita, M., et al. Textbook of Rapid Response Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39391-9_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39391-9_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39389-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39391-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics