Advertisement

The Teaching Evaluation Model: A Web Application Framework

  • Ida Verna
  • Edgardo BucciarelliEmail author
  • Gianfranco Giulioni
  • Marcello Silvestri
Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 616)

Abstract

The paper proposes a model for the continuous improvement of academic teaching aimed at delivering a programmed excellent learning in perspective. The proposed Teaching Evaluation Model (TEM) is a dynamic and open system based on the Deming Cycle (PLAN-DO-CHECK-ACT). The objective pursued by the model is to match the expected learning with real learning. The results of this work are intended to highlight the field application of the TEM approach. Specifically, the application consists of a web-based tool conceived and designed to allow teachers and institutions to build a continuous improvement of the teaching and learning processes. By enhancing the interior design education and hence the profession itself, the model reveals that technology-enhanced assessment may deliver tangible benefits for learners, teachers and institutions.

Keywords

Learner-centered-teaching PDCA cycle Graphical User Interface Technology-enhanced assessment 

References

  1. 1.
    Biggs, J.: Teaching for Quality Learning at University. Open University Press, Buckingham (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cooper, K., Olson, M.R.: The Multiple Is of Teacher Identity. The Falmer Press, London (1996)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Deming, W.: Elementary Principles of the Statistical Control of Quality. Nippon Kagaku Gijutsu Renmei, Tokyo (1950)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Entwistle, N., Ramsden, P.: Understanding Student Learning. Croom Helm, London (1983)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kyriakides, L., Campell, R.J.: School self evaluation and school improvement: a critique of values and procedures. Stud. Educ. Eval. 30, 23–36 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lyons, N.: With Portfolio in Hand. Validating the New Teacher Professionalism. Teachers College Press, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    MacBeath, J.: Schools Must Speak for Themselves. The Case for School Self Evaluation. Routledge, London (1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Prosser, M., Ramsden, P., Trigwell, K., Martin, E.: Dissonance in experience of teaching and its relation to the quality 2003 of student learning. Stud. High. Educ. 28(1), 37–48 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Selding, P.: Changing Practices in Evaluating Teaching. Anker Publishing Company, Bolton (1999)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Verna, I., Perozzi, D.: Applying TEM model (teaching evaluation model) in an academic course in accounting: a comparison across five years. Eur. Sci. J. 1, 1–15 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ida Verna
    • 1
  • Edgardo Bucciarelli
    • 2
    Email author
  • Gianfranco Giulioni
    • 2
  • Marcello Silvestri
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Management and Business AdministrationUniversity of Chieti-PescaraPescaraItaly
  2. 2.Department PPEQS – Economics and Quantitative MethodsUniversity of Chieti-PescaraPescaraItaly

Personalised recommendations