Skip to main content

The Development of Human Rights in Muslim Societies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Human Rights and Religion in Educational Contexts

Part of the book series: Interdisciplinary Studies in Human Rights ((CHREN,volume 1))

Abstract

Muslim states and scholars have had a dual encounter with human rights. On the one hand, it is claimed that Islam is a pioneer religion in offering universal ethics and valuable teachings on the dignity of man, on human rights and, particularly, on the equality of human beings before the law. Thus, the content of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and other relevant conventions in principal are accepted. On the other hand, creating the new idea of “Islamic human rights” in which the current principles of human rights are governed by the Sharī’a, Muslims spurned the equality in the cases of women and non-Muslims as if they regarded the inequality as a part of their faith. Some Muslims regard the paradigm of human rights as a new means by which Western culture dominates Muslim contexts in a post-colonial modern world.

In this contribution I will offer a solution that stems from Muslim jurists’ literature and language concerning the contradictions between Islam and human rights. This solution has some precedents in jurisprudence in other cases. However, the realization of the solution needs some prerequisite knowledge to lead the jurists as well as Muslim states to accept all doctrines of the human rights concerning the rights of religious minorities. The solution could be applied to other legal subjects which are in conflict with human rights.

Originally published as The Development of Human Rights in Muslim Societies in: M. L. Pirner, J. Lähnemann, H. Bielefeldt (Hrsg.) Menschenrechte und inter-religiöse Bildung, EB-Verlag Dr. Brandt e.K., Berlin 2015.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is not necessary to refer to many Arabic and Persian works that have been written on human rights with this view, but, for example, see one of the last ones in: ʽAmmāra (2010), p. 205.

  2. 2.

    For this suggestion, see: Encyclopaedia of the Quran, ed. by Jane Dammen McAuliffe, s. v. ‘Poll Tax’, by Paul L. Heck; also see: Simonsen (1988), esp. 47–61.

  3. 3.

    The conduct of rationalists is a major reason also for accepting single-source accounts of ḥadīth (khabar wāḥid) and indications (amārāt) in Shiite jurisprudence. See concerning the term ‘the conduct of rationalists’, Anṣārī (1419/1998), vol. 1: pp. 346–347, vol. 2: pp. 318–319.

  4. 4.

    The verse 9: 29 of the Qur’an is “Fight against such of those who have been given the Scripture as believe not in Allah nor the Last Day, and forbid not that which Allah hath forbidden by His Messenger, and follow not the Religion of Truth, until they pay the tribute [jizya] readily, being brought low”. Some radical Muslim groups claim that this verse is abrogating those verses that suggest dealing with others in good conduct.

  5. 5.

    Here, I mean by the term ‘utilitarianism’, what is narrated according to John Stuart Mill in Utilitarianism (1861). His version is plausible if not a very defensible ethical theory. See Mill (1969).

  6. 6.

    I don’t agree with the strategy that hides or denies those exclusivist aspects of Islam and highlights pluralistic ones, but my suggestion is ignoring the first category. Cf. Sachedina (2001), ʽAṭīyya Muḥammad (2003). Those authors conceal the exclusivist aspects of Islam in their works.

  7. 7.

    There is a rule in the book of inheritance (kitāb al-farā’iḍ) attributed to the Sixth Imam which indicates that it is lawful for every religionist to obey what is legal in his faith, Al-Ḥurr al-ʽĀmilī (1372/1992), vol. 26: p. 158, no. 4.

  8. 8.

    As regards to this rule in Shiite jurisprudence, see Bujnūrdī (1419/1998), vol. 3: pp. 179–209.

References

  • ʽAmmāra, M. (2010). haqā'iq wa shubahāt hawl al-simāha al-Islamiyya wa ḥuqūq al-insān [Realities and questions concerning Islamic moderation and human rights]. Cairo: Dār al-Salām.

    Google Scholar 

  • An-Naʽīm, A. A. (1996). Toward an Islamic reformation. New York: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anṣārī, M. (1998). Farā’id al-Uṣūl [Five monographs in Islamic legal theory] (Qum: Majmʽ al-Fikr al-Islāmī, 1419/1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • ʽAṭīyya Muḥammad, J. (2003). Naḥwa Fiqhin Jadīdin li al-Aqallīyāt [Towards new figh for minorities]. Cairo: Dār al-Islām.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bielefeldt, H. (1995). Muslim voices in the human rights debates. Human Rights Quarterly, 17, 587–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bujnūrdī, S. M. H. (1998). al-Qawāʽid al-Fiqhīyya [Jurisprudential rules] (Qum: al-Hādī, 1419/1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bukhārī, Muhammad b. Ismāʽil. (1401/1981). Saḥīḥ al-Bukhārī. Istanbul, Turkey: Dār al-Ṭibaʽa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalacoura, K. (2007). Islam, liberalism and human rights. New York: I. B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edalatnejad, S. (2009). Shiite tradition and modernism: The codification of the rights of religious minorities in Iranian laws (PhD dissertation, Berlin, Germany, 2009). Available online at: http://www.diss.fu-berlin.de/diss/receive/FUDISS_thesis_000000012134.

  • Ḥurr al-ʽĀmilī, Muhammad b. Ḥasan. (1372/1992). Tafṣīlu Wasā’il al-Shīʽa ilā Masā’īl al-Sharīʽa. Qum, Iran: Mu’assasa Āl al-Bayt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khānsārī, A. (1405/1983). Jamiʽal-Madārik. Tehran, Iran: Maktaba al-Ṣadūq.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. (1969). In J. M. Robson (Ed.), Utilitarianism in essays on ethics, religion and society: Vol. 10. Collected works of John Stuart Mill. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohe, M. (2013). Media legislation in Islamic countries. In M. L. Pirner & J. Laehnemann (Eds.), Media power and religions: The challenge facing intercultural dialogue and learning (pp. 27–38). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachedina, A. (2001). The Islamic roots of democratic pluralism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Simonsen, J. B. (1988). Studies in the genesis and early development of the caliphal taxation system. Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Qur’an (original text).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ṭūsī, Muhammad b. Ḥasan. (1387/1967). al-Mabsūṭ fī Fiqh al-Imamīyya. Tehran, Iran: Maktab al-Murṭaḍawīyya.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeid Edalatnejad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Edalatnejad, S. (2016). The Development of Human Rights in Muslim Societies. In: Pirner, M., Lähnemann, J., Bielefeldt, H. (eds) Human Rights and Religion in Educational Contexts. Interdisciplinary Studies in Human Rights, vol 1. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39351-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39351-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39350-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39351-3

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics