Skip to main content

Which Information Sources are More Trustworthy in a Scenario of Hydrogeological Risks: A Computational Platform

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Practical Applications of Scalable Multi-agent Systems. The PAAMS Collection (PAAMS 2016)

Abstract

In this work we realized a series of social simulations in order to investigate how a set of cognitive agents behave in presence of critical hydrogeological phenomena, showing some interesting results about their choices.

The paper starts with the presentation of an ad-hoc Bayesian trust model that we created and used in the simulations. Then we describe the realized platform that can be manipulated in order to shape many possible scenarios.

The simulations start with a world populated by a number of agents that have to deal with different and more or less dangerous meteorological events requiring adequate behaviors. So they need to take a decision and in order to select the right behavior they have to use the information sources they can access. Agents are also profiled into different categories, which shape how they use/trust their different sources.

They will someway interact with each other and with their information sources to finally decide how to behave.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    To be a PDF, it is necessary that the area subtended by it is equal to 1.

  2. 2.

    This has been made in order to ensure that self-trusting agents cannot always see the whole critical event.

References

  1. Burnett, C., Norman, T., Sycara, K.: Bootstrapping trust evaluations through stereotypes. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2010), pp. 241–248 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Burnett, C., Norman, T., Sycara, K.: Stereotypical trust and bias in dynamic multiagent systems. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. (TIST) 4(2), 26 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: Trust Theory: A Socio-Cognitive and Computational Model. Wiley, Chichester (2010)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Conte, R., Paolucci, M.: Reputation in artificial societies. Social beliefs for social order. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston (2002)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Falcone, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Generalizing trust: inferencing trustworthiness from categories. In: Falcone, R., Barber, S.K., Sabater-Mir, J., Singh, M.P. (eds.) Trust 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5396, pp. 65–80. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Falcone, R., Piunti, M., Venanzi, M., Castelfranchi C.: From Manifesta to Krypta: the relevance of categories for trusting others. In: Falcone, R., Singh, M. (eds.) Trust in Multiagent Systems, ACM Transaction on Intelligent Systems and Technology, vol.4(2), March 2013

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jiang, S., Zhang, J., Ong, Y.S.: An evolutionary model for constructing robust trust networks. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, B.: Uncertainty Theory, 5th edn. Springer, Berlin (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Melaye, D., Demazeau, Y.: Bayesian dynamic trust model. In: Pěchouček, M., Petta, P., Varga, L.Z. (eds.) CEEMAS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3690, pp. 480–489. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Quercia, D., Hailes, S., Capra, L.: B-Trust: Bayesian trust framework for pervasive computing. In: Stølen, K., Winsborough, W.H., Martinelli, F., Massacci, F. (eds.) iTrust 2006. LNCS, vol. 3986, pp. 298–312. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Sabater-Mir, J.: Trust and reputation for agent societies. Ph.D. thesis, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sabater-Mir, J., Sierra, C.: Regret: a reputation model for gregarious societies. In: 4th Workshop on Deception and Fraud in Agent Societies, Montreal, Canada, pp. 61–70 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang, Y., Vassileva, J.: Bayesian network-based trust model. In: Proceedings of IEEE/WIC International Conference on Web Intelligence, WI 2003, pp. 372–378. IEEE, October 2003

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wilensky, U.: NetLogo (1999). http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL

  15. Yolum, P., Singh, M.P.: Emergent properties of referral systems. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS 2003) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is partially supported by the project CLARA—CLoud plAtform and smart underground imaging for natural Risk Assessment, funded by the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (MIUR-PON).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rino Falcone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Falcone, R., Sapienza, A., Castelfranchi, C. (2016). Which Information Sources are More Trustworthy in a Scenario of Hydrogeological Risks: A Computational Platform. In: Demazeau, Y., Ito, T., Bajo, J., Escalona, M. (eds) Advances in Practical Applications of Scalable Multi-agent Systems. The PAAMS Collection. PAAMS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9662. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39324-7_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39324-7_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39323-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39324-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics