Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Game-Based Learning ((AGBL))

Abstract

This chapter discusses the role of modeling and worked examples in game-based learning. These instruction techniques can support students to focus on relevant information and to engage in a deeper level of processing (organizing new knowledge and integrate this with prior knowledge) without endangering the motivational appeal of computer games. In addition, it can help to connect informal knowledge representations acquired in the game with the formal domain knowledge representations. Four instructional aspects with respect to modeling and worked examples are discerned: timing (when is the model presented), level of completeness (models can be complete or incomplete), duration (modeling can be faded out or not), and modality (is the model presented in text, pictorial, or both). The results of the review indicate that the use of modeling and worked examples improves learning (d = .61), in particular when it is used to support domain-specific skills, but that little is known about the moderating effect of the four instructional aspects. In addition, it is not clear how modeling and worked examples influence motivation in serious games (d = .01). With respect to both issues more research is required.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bandura, A. (1976). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barzilai, S., & Blau, I. (2014). Scaffolding game-based learning: Impact on learning achievements, perceived learning, and game experiences. Computers & Education, 70, 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2001). The use of embedded scaffolds with hypermedia-supported student-centered learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10, 333–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charsky, D., & Ressler, W. (2011). “Games are made for fun”: lessons on the effects of concept maps in the classroom use of computer games. Computers & Education, 56(3), 604–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology. In L. Idol & B. F. Jones (Eds.), Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform (pp. 121–138). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R., McKendree, J., Tobin, R., Lee, J., & Mayes, T. (1999). Vicarious learning from dialogue and discourse. Instructional Science, 27, 431–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G.-J., Yang, L.-H., & Wang, S.-Y. (2013). A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students’ learning performance in natural science courses. Computers & Education, 69, 121–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ke, F. (2009). A qualitative meta-analysis of computer games as learning tools. Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (Vol. 1, pp. 1–32). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, J., & O’Neil, H. (2008). The effect of presenting just-in-time worked examples for problem solving in a computer game. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang, J., & O’Neil, H. (2011). Using computer games to teach adult learners problem solving. In S. Tobias & D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 435–452). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leemkuil, H., & de Jong, T. (2011). Instructional support in games. In S. Tobias & D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 353–369). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutner, D. (1993). Guided discovery learning with computer-based simulation games: Effects of adaptive and non-adaptive instructional support. Learning and Instruction, 3(2), 113–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist, 63, 760–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E. (2011). Multimedia learning and games. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 281–305). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. E., Mautone, P., & Prothero, W. (2002). Pictorial aids for learning by doing in a multimedia geology simulation game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 171–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: Instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations. Learning and Instruction, 12(5), 529–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, J. A. C., Wielinga, B. J., & Christoph, L. H. (2012). The role of prescriptive models in learning. Computers & Education, 59, 839–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, S.- J., & O’Neil, H. (2006). The effectiveness of worked examples in a game-based learning environment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • ter Vrugte, J., de Jong, T., Vandercruysse, S., Wouters, P., van Oostendorp, H., & Elen, J. (in preparation). Game-based mathematics education: Do fading worked examples facilitate knowledge acquisition?

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gog, T., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004). Process-oriented worked examples: Improving transfer performance through enhanced understanding. Instructional Science, 32, 83–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Gog, T., & Rummel, N. (2010). Example-based learning: Integrating cognitive and social-cognitive research perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 155–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Merriënboer, J. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Oostendorp, H., Beijersbergen, M. J. & Solaimani, S. (2008). Conditions for learning from animations. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 438–445). International Society of the Learning Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, P., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. M. (2008). How to optimize learning from animated models: A review of guidelines based on cognitive load. Review of Educational Research, 78, 645–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, P., Tabbers, H. K., & Paas, F. (2007). Interactivity in video-based models. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, P., Van Nimwegen, C., Van Oostendorp, H., & Van Der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, P., & Van Oostendorp, H. (2013). A meta-analytic review of the role of instructional support in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 60(1), 412–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pieter Wouters .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wouters, P. (2017). Modeling and Worked Examples in Game-Based Learning. In: Wouters, P., van Oostendorp, H. (eds) Instructional Techniques to Facilitate Learning and Motivation of Serious Games. Advances in Game-Based Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39298-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39298-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39296-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39298-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics