Abstract
This chapter discusses the role of modeling and worked examples in game-based learning. These instruction techniques can support students to focus on relevant information and to engage in a deeper level of processing (organizing new knowledge and integrate this with prior knowledge) without endangering the motivational appeal of computer games. In addition, it can help to connect informal knowledge representations acquired in the game with the formal domain knowledge representations. Four instructional aspects with respect to modeling and worked examples are discerned: timing (when is the model presented), level of completeness (models can be complete or incomplete), duration (modeling can be faded out or not), and modality (is the model presented in text, pictorial, or both). The results of the review indicate that the use of modeling and worked examples improves learning (d = .61), in particular when it is used to support domain-specific skills, but that little is known about the moderating effect of the four instructional aspects. In addition, it is not clear how modeling and worked examples influence motivation in serious games (d = .01). With respect to both issues more research is required.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bandura, A. (1976). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Barzilai, S., & Blau, I. (2014). Scaffolding game-based learning: Impact on learning achievements, perceived learning, and game experiences. Computers & Education, 70, 65–79.
Brush, T., & Saye, J. (2001). The use of embedded scaffolds with hypermedia-supported student-centered learning. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10, 333–356.
Charsky, D., & Ressler, W. (2011). “Games are made for fun”: lessons on the effects of concept maps in the classroom use of computer games. Computers & Education, 56(3), 604–615.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Collins, A. (1991). Cognitive apprenticeship and instructional technology. In L. Idol & B. F. Jones (Eds.), Educational values and cognitive instruction: Implications for reform (pp. 121–138). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (1989). Cognitive apprenticeship: Teaching the crafts of reading, writing, and mathematics. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 453–494). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cox, R., McKendree, J., Tobin, R., Lee, J., & Mayes, T. (1999). Vicarious learning from dialogue and discourse. Instructional Science, 27, 431–458.
Hwang, G.-J., Yang, L.-H., & Wang, S.-Y. (2013). A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students’ learning performance in natural science courses. Computers & Education, 69, 121–130.
Ke, F. (2009). A qualitative meta-analysis of computer games as learning tools. Handbook of research on effective electronic gaming in education (Vol. 1, pp. 1–32). Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lang, J., & O’Neil, H. (2008). The effect of presenting just-in-time worked examples for problem solving in a computer game. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New York, USA.
Lang, J., & O’Neil, H. (2011). Using computer games to teach adult learners problem solving. In S. Tobias & D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 435–452). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Leemkuil, H., & de Jong, T. (2011). Instructional support in games. In S. Tobias & D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 353–369). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Leutner, D. (1993). Guided discovery learning with computer-based simulation games: Effects of adaptive and non-adaptive instructional support. Learning and Instruction, 3(2), 113–132.
Mayer, R. E. (2008). Applying the science of learning: Evidence-based principles for the design of multimedia instruction. American Psychologist, 63, 760–769.
Mayer, R. E. (2011). Multimedia learning and games. In S. Tobias & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Computer games and instruction (pp. 281–305). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Mayer, R. E., Mautone, P., & Prothero, W. (2002). Pictorial aids for learning by doing in a multimedia geology simulation game. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(1), 171–185.
Paas, F., Renkl, A., & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational Psychologist, 38, 1–5.
Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: The mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13(3), 273–304.
Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: Instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations. Learning and Instruction, 12(5), 529–556.
Renkl, A., & Atkinson, R. K. (2003). Structuring the transition from example study to problem solving in cognitive skill acquisition: A cognitive load perspective. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 15–22.
Sandberg, J. A. C., Wielinga, B. J., & Christoph, L. H. (2012). The role of prescriptive models in learning. Computers & Education, 59, 839–854.
Shen, S.- J., & O’Neil, H. (2006). The effectiveness of worked examples in a game-based learning environment. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, USA.
ter Vrugte, J., de Jong, T., Vandercruysse, S., Wouters, P., van Oostendorp, H., & Elen, J. (in preparation). Game-based mathematics education: Do fading worked examples facilitate knowledge acquisition?
Van Gog, T., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2004). Process-oriented worked examples: Improving transfer performance through enhanced understanding. Instructional Science, 32, 83–98.
Van Gog, T., & Rummel, N. (2010). Example-based learning: Integrating cognitive and social-cognitive research perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 155–174.
Van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1997). Training complex cognitive skills. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
Van Merriënboer, J. J., Kirschner, P. A., & Kester, L. (2003). Taking the load off a learner’s mind: Instructional design for complex learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 5–13.
Van Oostendorp, H., Beijersbergen, M. J. & Solaimani, S. (2008). Conditions for learning from animations. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference of the Learning Sciences (pp. 438–445). International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Wouters, P., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. M. (2008). How to optimize learning from animated models: A review of guidelines based on cognitive load. Review of Educational Research, 78, 645–675.
Wouters, P., Tabbers, H. K., & Paas, F. (2007). Interactivity in video-based models. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 327–342.
Wouters, P., Van Nimwegen, C., Van Oostendorp, H., & Van Der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249–265.
Wouters, P., & Van Oostendorp, H. (2013). A meta-analytic review of the role of instructional support in game-based learning. Computers & Education, 60(1), 412–425.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wouters, P. (2017). Modeling and Worked Examples in Game-Based Learning. In: Wouters, P., van Oostendorp, H. (eds) Instructional Techniques to Facilitate Learning and Motivation of Serious Games. Advances in Game-Based Learning. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39298-1_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39298-1_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39296-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39298-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)