Abstract
To facilitate innovation of value-enabling IT services in a service ecosystem, digital service platforms are needed. However, existing service platforms, neither fully inscribes premises of the service dominant logic, nor the principles of open innovation. Seldom are they digital. We argue that there is a lack of consolidated normative theory of how to design digital service innovation platforms. This is problematic, because it hampers actors in service ecosystems to combine and advance their capabilities. To this end, researchers and practitioners have jointly designed and evaluated a digital service platform using Action Design Research methodology. Accordingly, the overall purpose of this paper is to present intermediate results from the evaluation of the digital service platform and to contribute nascent design principles enabling researchers and practitioners to leverage other instances of purposive digital service platforms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
We agree with [3, p 161] who define a service ecosystem as a “relatively self-contained, self-adjusting system of mostly loosely coupled social and economic (resource-integrating) actors connected by shared institutional logics and mutual value creation through service exchange”.
- 2.
We have embraced a broad definition of digital innovation, which is in line with [31] who describes an innovation as, “…an idea, practice, or project that is perceived as new by an individual or other unit of adoption”. However, to be an IT service innovation we add that the innovation is enabling value and is composed of or enabled by IT.
- 3.
Note. There is a difference between service process and service innovation process.
References
Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Why service? J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 36(1), 25–38 (2008)
Chesbrough, H.: Open Services Innovation: Rethinking Your Business to Grow and Compete in a New Era. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2011)
Lusch, R., Nambisan, S.: Service innovation: a service-dominant logic perspective. MIS Q. 39(1), 155–176 (2015)
Henfridsson, O., Mathiassen, L., Svahn, F.: Managing technological change in the digital age: the role of architectural frames. J. Inf. Technol. 29, 27–43 (2014)
Yoo, Y., Lyytinen, K., Boland, R., Berente, N., Gaskin, J., Schutz, D., Srinivasan, N.: The next wave of digital innovation: opportunities and challenges. In: A Report of a Research Workshop on Digital Challenges in Innovation Research (2010)
Yoo, Y., Boland, R.J., Lyytinen, K., Majchrzak, A.: Organizing for innovation in the digitized world. Organ. Sci. 23(5), 1398–1408 (2012)
Diener, K, and Piller, F.: Facets of open innovation: development of a conceptual framework. In: Open User Innovation Conference, Boston (2008)
Prahalad, C.K., Ramaswamy, V.: Co-creating unique value with customers. Strateg. Leadersh. 32(3), 4–9 (2004)
Nylén, D., Holmström, J.: Digital innovation strategy: a framework for diagnosing and improving digital product and service innovation. Bus. Horiz. 58(1), 57–67 (2015)
Kappelman, L., Johnson, V., McLean, E., Gerhart, N.: The 2014 SIM IT key issues and trends study. MIS Q. Exec. 13(4), 237–263 (2014)
Lusch, R.F., Vargo, S.L., O’Brien, M.: Competing through service: insights from service-dominant logic. J. Retail. 83(1), 2–18 (2007)
Walls, J.H., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.A.: Building an information systems design theory for vigilant EIS. Inf. Syst. Res. 3(1), 36–59 (1992)
Sein, M., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action design research. MIS Q. 35(1), 37–56 (2011)
Yoo, J. H.: Service platform strategy: social networking and mobile service platform perspectives. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2011)
Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. J. Mark. 68, 1–17 (2004)
Heinrich, P., Schwabe, G.: Communicating nascent design theories on innovative information systems through multi-grounded design principles. In: Tremblay, M.C., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Gupta, A., Yoon, V. (eds.) DESRIST 2014. LNCS, vol. 8463, pp. 148–163. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Chesbrough, H.: Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA (2003)
Markus, M.L., Majchrzak, A., Gasser, L.: A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Q. 26(3), 179–212 (2002)
Kuechler, W., Vaishnavi, V.: On theory development in design science research anatomy of a research project. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17, 489–504 (2008)
Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. Manage. Inf. Syst. Q. 37, 337–355 (2013)
Merton, R.C.: Harvard Business Review 91(4), 48–56, 9p. 3, April 2013
Eaton, B., Elaluf-Calderwood, S., Sørensen, C., Yoo, Y.: Distributed tuning of boundary resources: the case of apple’s iOS service system. MIS Q. 39(1), 217–243 (2015)
Vargo, S.L., Lusch, R.F.: Institutions and axioms An extension and update of service-dominant logic. J. Acad. Mark. Sci. 44, 5–23 (2015). Advance online
Wareham, J., Fox, P.B., Cano Giner, J.L.: Technology Ecosystem Governance. Sci. 25, 1195–1215 (2014). Articles in Advance
Boudreau, K.: Does opening a platform stimulate innovation? The effect on systemic and modular innovations. MIT Sloan Research paper No. 4611-05 (2007)
Ceccagnoli, M., Forma, C., Huang, P., Wu, D.J.: Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem: the case of enterprise software. MIS Q. 36(1), 263–290 (2012)
Drucker, P.: The coming of the new organization. Harvard Bus. Rev. 66, 45–53 (1988)
Christensen, C.: The Innovators Dilemma. Harvard Bussiness Review, Boston, US (1997)
Thomke, S.: Enlightened experimentation - the new imperative for innovation. Harvard Bus. Rev. 79(2), 66–75 (2001)
Chesbrough, H., Bogers, M.: Explicating open innovation. In: Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J. (eds.) New Frontiers in Open Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014)
Rogers, E.M.: Diffusion of Innovations. Free Press, New York (2003)
Gopalakrishnan, S., Damanpour, F.: A review of innovation research in economics, sociology, and technology management. Omega 25(1), 15–28 (1997)
Davenport, T.: Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology. Harvard Business School, Boston (1993)
den Hertog, P., van der Aa, W., de Jong, M.W.: Capabilities for managing service innovation towards a conceptual framework. J. Serv. Manage. 21(4), 490–514 (2010)
Vanhaverbeke, W., Chesbrough, H., West, J.: Surfing the new wave of open innovation research. In: Chesbrough, H., Vanhaverbeke, W., West, J. (eds.) New Frontiers in Open Innovation. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2014)
Office of Government Commerce: ITIL Service Operation. The Stationary Office (2011)
CMMI Product Team: CMMI for Services Version 1.3, Carnegie Mellon. Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA (2010)
Hoving, W., van Bon, J.: The ISM Method – Past, Present and Future of IT Service Management. The Stationary Office, London (2012)
Rostock, P.: En bok om IT Service Management. Stjärnförlag, Sundbyberg (2013)
Göbel, H.: IT Service management - design principles for IT service management, Licentiate thesis. University of Linköping, Linköping (2014)
ITSM Community.: OGC self-assessment tool for ITIL service support (2016). http://www.itsmcommunity.org/resources/tool/ogc_self_assessment_tool_for_itil_service_support/
Zoho Corp.: Service Desk Plus. https://www.manageengine.com/products/service-desk. Accessed 12 Feb 2016
Solisma, Service Improvement Tool. http://service-improvement.com/. Accessed 16 Feb 2014
Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods, 2nd edn. Sage Publications, London (1990)
Goldkuhl, G.: Design theories in information systems - a need for multi-grounding. J. Inf. Technol. Theory Appl. JITTA 6, 59–72 (2004)
Robertson, A.: Innovation management. Manag. Decis. Monogr. 12, 6–16 (1974)
Zaltman, G., Duncan, R., Holbek, J.: Innovations and Organizations. Wiley, New York (1973)
Fowler, F.J.: Survey Research Methods. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA (2002)
Hipp, C., Grupp, H.: Innovation in the service sector: the demand for service-specific innovation measurement concepts and typologies. Res. Policy 34, 517–535 (2005)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Göbel, H., Cronholm, S. (2016). Nascent Design Principles Enabling Digital Service Platforms. In: Parsons, J., Tuunanen, T., Venable, J., Donnellan, B., Helfert, M., Kenneally, J. (eds) Tackling Society's Grand Challenges with Design Science. DESRIST 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9661. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39294-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39294-3_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39293-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39294-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)