Skip to main content

The Science of Female Orgasms: Pleasing Female Partners in Casual and Long-Term Relationships

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Psychology of Love and Hate in Intimate Relationships

Abstract

The occurrence of the female orgasm, or lack thereof, has fueled productive research regarding gender differences in sexuality. Both scientific research and popular beliefs support the idea that men orgasm more frequently than women do and, given the biological nature of the orgasm phase of sexual responses, it is easy to assume that the gender difference in orgasm frequency is “natural” and unresponsive to contextual factors (e.g., relationship styles). While it may be true that men orgasm more frequently than women in partnered sex, using sociocultural approaches to understanding orgasm, we argue that it is inaccurate to suggest that men’s orgasms are easier and women’s are more difficult to invoke. In other words, yes—men orgasm more frequently than women—but this is not because women are biologically hardwired not to orgasm or receive sexual pleasure. Yet remains the question: Why do women orgasm less frequently than men do? What factors might narrow this gap in orgasm frequency between men and women? In this chapter, we critically examine gender differences in orgasm and, in doing so, provide science-based suggestions for individuals and relationship partners to close the orgasm gap between heterosexual men and women. We will begin our examination of women’s orgasm with providing an overview anatomy and orgasm. For the remainder of the chapter, we consider orgasm frequency in the context of both short-term (casual sex and hookup scenarios) and long-term relationships. Throughout, we offer suggestions for women and their sexual partners to increase women’s orgasm frequency across both short-term and long-term relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We limit ourselves to only discussing the orgasm gap between heterosexual men and women because recent research finds that women orgasm at different rates based on their sexual orientation. Specifically, lesbian women orgasm more consistently during partnered sex than bisexual and heterosexual women do (Garcia et al. 2014).

  2. 2.

    Although there are other reasons as to why women might fake orgasms (e.g., to increase the arousal of one’s sexual partner or to appeal to the ego of one’s sexual partner), faking it is an alternative to not having an orgasm at all. Though we do not discuss faking orgasms in this chapter, we do wish to put out some advice: If women wish for their partners to be better at sex, faking it could impede their partner’s willingness or awareness of needing to learn new skills. We would encourage partners to have honest and open communication about their lack of orgasm, rather than misleading a partner to believe that her or his techniques are effective. Haven’t we all heard of the phrase “don’t fix it if it isn’t broken”? The same logic applies here.

References

  • Angier, N. (1999). Woman: An intimate geography. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2009). Orgasms in college hookups and relationships. In B. J. Risman (Ed.), Families as they really are (pp. 362–377). New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, E. A., Hamilton, L., & England, P. (2010). Is hooking up bad for young women? Contexts, 9, 22–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, E. A., England, P., & Fogarty, A. C. K. (2012). Accounting for women’s orgasm and sexual enjoyment in college hookups and relationships. American Sociological Review, 77(3), 435–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basson, R. (2001). Human sex-response cycles. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 27(1), 33–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bogle, K. A. (2008). Hooking up: Sex, dating, and relationships on campus. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Both, S., Laan, E., & Everaerd, W. (2011). Focusing “hot” or focusing “cool”: Attentional mechanisms in sexual arousal in men and women. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 8(1), 167–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, V., Gavey, N., & McPhillips, K. (2003). The “fair deal?” Unpacking accounts of reciprocity in heterosex. Sexualities, 6(2), 237–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brewis, A., & Meyer, M. (2005). Marital coitus across the life course. Journal of Biosocial Science, 37(4), 499–518.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Byers, E. S., & Demmons, S. (1999). Sexual satisfaction and sexual self-disclosure within dating relationships. The Journal of Sex Research, 36(2), 180–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clement, U. (2002). Sex in long-term relationships: A systemic approach to sexual desire problems. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31(3), 241–246.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, T. D. (2011). Perceived proposer personality characteristics and gender differences in acceptance of casual sex offers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 309–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, T. D., Ziegler, A., & Moors, A. C. (2013a). Backlash from the bedroom Stigma mediates gender differences in acceptance of casual sex offers. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37(3), 392–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conley, T. D., Ziegler, A., Moors, A. C., Matsick, J. L., & Valentine, B. (2013b). A critical examination of popular assumptions about the benefits and outcomes of monogamous relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(2), 124–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, M., & Popp, D. (2003). Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research. Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 13–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, S. J., Lalumière, M. L., Allen, S. W., Vasey, P. L., & Suschinsky, K. D. (2013). Can habituation of sexual responses be elicited in men and women when attention is maintained? Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 45(3), 274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahs, B. (2011). Performing sex: The making and unmaking of women’s erotic lives. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fugl-Meyer, K. S., Öberg, K., Lundberg, P. O., Lewin, B., & Fugl-Meyer, A. (2006). On orgasm, sexual techniques, and erotic perceptions in 18- to 74-year-old Swedish women. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 3(1), 56–68.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon, J. H., & Simon, W. (1973). Sexual conduct: The social sources of human sexuality. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, J. R., Lloyd, E. A., Wallen, K., & Fisher, H. E. (2014). Variation in orgasm occurrence by sexual orientation in a sample of U.S. singles. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 11(11), 2645–2652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbenick, D., Reece, M., Schick, V., Sanders, S. A., Dodge, B., & Fortenberry, J. D. (2010). An event-level analysis of the sexual characteristics and composition among adults ages 18 to 59: Results from a national probability sample in the United States. The Journal of Sexual Medicine, 7(5), 346–361.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, D. F., & Apt, C. (1995). The coital alignment technique and directed masturbation: A comparative study on female orgasm. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 21(1), 21–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hurlbert, D. F., & Whittaker, K. E. (1991). The role of masturbation in marital and sexual satisfaction: A comparative study of female masturbators and nonmasturbators. Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 17(4), 272–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J. S., & DeLamater, J. D. (2010). Understanding human sexuality (11th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. P., Strassberg, D. S., & Kircher, J. R. (1990). Attitudinal and experiential correlates of anorgasmia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 19(2), 165–177.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A., Pomeroy, W., Martin, C., & Gebhard, P. (1953). Sexual behavior in the human female. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klusmann, D. (2002). Sexual motivation and the duration of partnership. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 31(3), 275–287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koukounas, E., & Over, R. (1993). Habituation and dishabituation of male sexual arousal. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31(6), 575–585.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koukounas, E., & Over, R. (2001). Habituation of male sexual arousal: Effects of attentional focus. Biological Psychology, 58(1), 49–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laumann, E. O., Gagnon, J. H., Michael, R. T., & Michaels, S. (1994). The social organization of sexuality: Sexual practices in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masters, W. H., & Johnson, V. E. (1966). Human sexual response. New York, NY: Ishi Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, S. I. (2014). “What do you mean when you say that you’re sexually satisfied?” A mixed methods study. Feminism & Psychology, 24(1), 74–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meuwissen, I., & Over, R. (1990). Habituation and dishabituation of female sexual arousal. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 28(3), 217–226.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ogletree, S. M., & Ginsburg, H. J. (2000). Kept under the hood: Neglect of the clitoris in common vernacular. Sex Roles, 43(11), 917–926.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascoe, C. J. (2007). Dude, you’re a fag: Sexuality and masculinity in high school. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perel, E. (2006). Mating in captivity: Unlocking erotic intelligence. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, I. L. (1964). The scaling of premarital sexual permissiveness. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 188–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, C. M. A., & Fisher, W. A. (2014). “Did you come?” A qualitative exploration of gender differences in beliefs, experiences, and concerns regarding female orgasm occurrence during heterosexual interactions. Journal of Sex Research, 51(6), 616–631.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, S. A., & Reinisch, J. M. (1999). Would you say you “had sex” if…? Journal of American Medical Association, 281(3), 275–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, E. B., & Wagner, N. N. (1976). Written descriptions of orgasm: A study of sex differences. Archives of Sexual Behaviors, 5(1), 87–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiederman, M. W. (1997). Pretending orgasm during sexual intercourse: Correlates in a sample of young adult women. Journal of Sex and Marital Therapy, 23, 131–139.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zamboni, B. D., & Crawford, I. (2003). Using masturbation in sex therapy: Relationships between masturbation, sexual desire, and sexual fantasy. Journal of Psychology and Human Sexuality, 14(2–3), 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jes L. Matsick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Matsick, J.L., Conley, T.D., Moors, A.C. (2016). The Science of Female Orgasms: Pleasing Female Partners in Casual and Long-Term Relationships. In: Aumer, K. (eds) The Psychology of Love and Hate in Intimate Relationships. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39277-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics