Skip to main content

Contrast Agents in Childhood: Application and Safety Considerations

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Pediatric Urogenital Radiology

Part of the book series: Medical Radiology ((Med Radiol Diagn Imaging))

Abstract

Contrast agents are essential for a number of radiological studies in children; most of them are handled and excreted by the kidney. This chapter tries to summarize the relevant contrast agents handled by the kidney that are used in childhood imaging, to give some considerations toward age and weight-adapted dose, and to discuss safety issues including precautions helpful to avoid complications or their sequelae. Contrast agents and applications outside the genitourinary tract as well as those not primarily handled by the kidney are not addressed – a comprehensive summary of all potential applications and risks can be found in the recently updated book entitled Contrast Media: Safety Issues and ESUR Guidelines (Thomsen et al. 2014).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American College of Radiology – ACR 2012/manual on contrast media v8 – contrast media in children. http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safety/Resources/Contrast-Manual

  • Ascenti G, Zimbaro G, Mazziotti S et al (2004) Harmonic US imaging of vesicoureteric reflux in children: usefulness of a second generation US contrast agent. Pediatr Radiol 34:481–487

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berrocal T, Gaya F, Arjonilla A et al (2001) Vesicoureteral reflux: diagnosis and grading with echo-enhanced cystosonography versus voiding cystourethrography. Radiology 221:359–365

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berrocal T, Gaya F, Arjonilla A (2005) Vesicoureteral reflux: can the urethra be adequately assessed by using contrast-enhanced voiding US of the bladder? Radiology 234:235–241, 650

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bosio M, Manzoni GA (2002) Detection of posterior urethral valves with voiding cysto-urethrosonography with echo contrast. J Urol 168:1711–1715

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brasch RC (2008) Contrast media toxicity in children. Pediatr Radiol 38(S2):S281–S284

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Calliada F, Campani R, Bottinelli O, Bozzini A, Sommaruga MG (1998) Ultrasound contrast agents: basic principles. Eur J Radiol 27(S2):S157–S160

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darge K (2008) Voiding urosonography with ultrasound contrast agents for the diagnosis of vesicoureteric reflux in children. I. Procedure. Pediatr Radiol 38:40–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darge K (2010) Voiding urosonography with US contrast agent for the diagnosis of vesicoureteric reflux in children: an update. Pediatr Radiol 40:956–962

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Darge K, Zieger B, Rohrschneider W et al (2001) Reduction in voiding cystourethrographies after the introduction of contrast enhanced sonographic reflux diagnosis. Pediatr Radiol 31:790–795

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Darge K, Papadopoulou F, Ntoulia A, Bulas DI, Coley BD, Fordham LA, Paltiel HJ, McCarville B, Volberg FM, Cosgrove DO, Goldberg BB, Wilson SR, Feinstein SB (2013) Safety of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in children for non-cardiac applications: a review by the Society for Pediatric Radiology (SPR) and the International Contrast Ultrasound Society (ICUS). Pediatr Radiol 43:1063–1073

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davenport MS, Khalatbari S, Dillman JR, Cohan RH, Caoili EM, Ellis JH (2013) Contrast material-induced nephrotoxicity and intravenous low-osmolality iodinated contrast material. Radiology 267:94–105. doi:10.2214/AJR.14.13761

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson P, Becker A, Holton JM (1983) The effect of contrast media on the growth of bacteria. Br J Radiol 56:809–815

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dharnidharka VR, Wesson SK, Fennell RS (2007) Gadolinium and nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy in pediatric patients. Pediatr Nephrol 22:1395

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Duran C, Valera A, Alguersuari A et al (2009) Voiding urosonography: the study of the urethra is no longer a limitation of the technique. Pediatr Radiol 39:124–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • EMA’s final opinion confirms restrictions on use of linear gadolinium agents in body scans (2017). EMA/457616/2017, last visited April 2018. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Referrals_document/gadolinium_contrast_agents_31/Opinion_provided_by_Committee_for_Medicinal_Products_for_Human_Use/WC500231824.pdf

  • Esposito F, Di Serafino M, Sgambati P, Mercogliano F, Tarantino L, Vallone G, Oresta P (2012) Ultrasound contrast media in paediatric patients: is it an off-label use? Regulatory requirements and radiologist’s liability. Radiol Med 117:148–159

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Foss C, Smith JK, Ortiz L, Hanevold C, Davis L (2009) Gadolinium-associated nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in a 9-year-old boy. Pediatr Dermatol 26:579–582

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frush DP (2008) Pediatric abdominal CT angiography. Pediatr Radiol 38(S2):S259–S266

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Garfinkle MA, Stewart S, Basi R (2015) Incidence of ct contrast agent–induced nephropathy: toward a more accurate estimation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 204:1146–1151. doi:10.2214/AJR.14.13761

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn G, Sorge I, Gruhn B et al (2009) Pharmacokinetics and safety of gadobutrol-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric patients. Invest Radiol 44:776–783

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heran MK, Marshalleck F, Temple M et al. Society of Interventional Radiology Standards of Practice Committee; Society of Pediatric Radiology Interventional Radiology Committee (2010) Joint quality improvement guidelines for pediatric arterial access and arteriography: from the Societies of Interventional Radiology and Pediatric Radiology. Pediatr Radiol 40:237–250

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hiorns MP (2011) Gastrointestinal tract imaging in children: current techniques. Pediatr Radiol 41:42–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jain SM, Wesson S, Hassanein A et al (2004) Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy in pediatric patients. Pediatr Nephrol 19:467–470

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kalmar P, Riccabona M (2013) Intramedulläre Gadoliniumresiduen in Nieren pädiatrischer Onkologie-Patienten – ein Wort zur Vorsicht. 50. GPR Jahrestagung, Jena, September 2013. Fortschr Röntgenstr (RöFo) 185:893 (abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Karcaaltincaba M, Oguz B, Haliloglu M (2009) Current status of contrast-induced nephropathy and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in children. Pediatr Radiol 39(S3):S382–S384

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurian J, Epelman M, Darge K et al (2013) The role of CT angiography in the evaluation of pediatric renovascular hypertension. Pediatr Radiol 43:490–501

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mannelli L, Maki JH, Osman SF et al (2012) Non-contrast functional MRI of the kidneys. Curr Urol Rep 13:99–107

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCarville MB (2011) Contrast-enhanced sonography in pediatrics. Pediatr Radiol 41(S1):S238–S242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald RJ, McDonald JS., Kallmes DF, Jentoft ME, Murray DL, Thielen KR, Williamson EE, Eckel LJ (2015) Intracranial gadolinium deposition after contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 275:772–7782. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1148/radiol.15150025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mendichovszky IA, Marks SD, Simcock CM, Olsen OE (2008) Gadolinium and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: time to tighten practice. Pediatr Radiol 38:489–496

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mentzel HJ, Vogt S, Patzer L, Schubert R, John U, Misselwitz J, Kaiser WA (1999) Contrast-enhanced sonography of vesicoureteral reflux in children: preliminary results. Am J Roentgenol 173:737–740

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkonen R, Kontkanen T, Kivisaari L (1995) Late and acute adverse reactions to iohexol in a pediatric population. Acta Radiol 35:350–352

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morcos SK (2007) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis following the administration of extracellular gadolinium based contrast agents: is the stability of the contrast agent molecule an important factor in the pathogenesis of this condition? Br J Radiol 80:73–76, Erratum in: Br J Radiol 2007;80:586

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newhouse JH, Kho D, Rao QA, Starren J (2008) Frequency of serum creatinine changes in the absence of iodinated contrast material: implications for studies of contrast nephrotoxicity. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:376–382. doi:10.2214/AJR.14.13761

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulou F, Ntoulia A, Siomou E, Darge K (2014) Contrast-enhanced voiding urosonography with intravesical administration of a second-generation ultrasound contrast agent for diagnosis of vesicoureteral reflux: prospective evaluation of contrast safety in 1,010 children. Pediatr Radiol 44:719–728

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pärtan G (2014) Radiography and fluoroscopy. In: Riccabona M (ed) Pediatric imaging essentials. Thieme, Stuttgart/New-York, pp 10–19. ISBN 987-3-13-166191-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Penfield JG, Reilly RF (2008) Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis risk: is there a difference between gadolinium-based contrast agents? Semin Dial 21:129–134

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piscaglia F, Bolondi L (2006) The safety of Sonovue in abdominal applications: retrospective analysis of 23188 investigations. Ultrasound Med Biol 32:1369–1375

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piskunowicz M, Kosiak W, Irga N (2011) Primum non nocere? Why can’t we use second generation ultrasound contrast agents for the examination of children? Ultraschall Med 32:83–86

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piskunowicz M, Kosiak W, Batko T (2012) Intravenous application of second-generation ultrasound contrast agents in children: a review of the literature. Ultraschall Med 33:135–140

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Riccabona M (2002) Cystography in infants and children: a critical appraisal of the many forms with special regard to voiding cystourethrography. Eur Radiol 12:2910–2918

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riccabona M (2012) Application of a second-generation US contrast agent in infants and children – a European questionnaire-based survey. Pediatr Radiol 42:1471–1480

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riccabona M (2014) Contrast media use in pediatrics: safety issues. In: Thomsen HS, Webb JAW (eds) Contrast media. Safety issues and ESUR guidelines, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg/New-York/Dordrecht/London, pp 245–253. ISBN 978-3-642-36723-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Riccabona M, Avni FE, Blickman JG et al (2008) Imaging recommendations in paediatric uroradiology: minutes of the ESPR workgroup session on urinary tract infection, fetal hydronephrosis, urinary tract ultrasonography and voiding cystourethrography. Barcelona, Spain, June 2007. Pediatr Radiol 38:138–145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riccabona M, Avni FE, Blickman JG, Dacher JN, Darge K, Lobo ML, Willi U, Members of the ESUR Paediatric Paediatric Recommendation Work Group and ESPR Paediatric Uroradiology Work Group (2009) Imaging recommendations in paediatric uroradiology, part II: urolithiasis and haematuria in children, paediatric obstructive uropathy, and postnatal work-up of foetally diagnosed high grade hydronephrosis. Minutes of a mini-symposium at the ESPR annual meeting, Edinburg, June. Pediatr Radiol 39:891–898

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riccabona M, Avni F, Damasio B et al (2012) ESPR Uroradiology Task Force and ESUR Paediatric Working Group: imaging recommendations in paediatric uroradiology, part V: childhood cystic kidney disease, childhood renal transplantation and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in children. Pediatr Radiol 42:1275–1283

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber-Dietrich D, Dietrich CF (2012) Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and off-label use (in children). Ultraschall Med 33:295–296

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sorantin E, Weissensteiner S, Hasenburger G, Riccabona M. CT in children - dose protection and generalconsiderations when planning a CT in a child. Eur Radiol 2013; 82 (7): 1043-1049.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sorantin E (2013) Special aspects of computed tomography in children. In: Riccabona M (ed) Pediatric imaging essentials. Thieme, Stuttgart/New-York, pp 22–28. ISBN 987-3-13-166191-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorantin E, Zsivcsec B, Zebedin D, Fotter R (2002) Optimierung von i.v. Kontrastmittel-applikatonen für pädiatrische Spiral-CT Untersuchungen (Optimisation of i.v. contrast application for pediatric spiral-CT). Radiologe 45:683–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorantin E, Weissensteiner S, Hasenburger G, Riccabona M (2013) CT in children – dose protection and general considerations when planning a CT in a child. Eur J Radiol 82:1043–1049

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Speck U (1999) Kontrastmittel: Übersicht, Anwendung und pharmazeutische Aspekte [Contrast Media. overview, use and pharmaceutical aspects]. Springer, Berlin, pp 16–17. ISBN 978-3-540-65712-5

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenzel M (2013) Intravenous contrast-enhanced sonography in children and adolescents – a single center experience. J Ultrason 13:133–144

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Stenzel M, Mentzel HJ (2014) Ultrasound elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in infants, children and adolescents. Eur J Radiol 83:1560–1569

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ter Haar G (2009) Safety and bio-effects of ultrasound contrast agents. Med Biol Eng Comput 47:893–900

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thaker VV, Leung AM, Braverman LE, Brown RS, Levine B (2014) Iodine-induced hypothyroidism in full-term infants with congenital heart disease: more common than currently appreciated? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99:3521–3526. doi:10.1210/jc.2014-1956

    PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen HS, Webb JAW (eds) (2014) Contrast media. Safety issues and ESUR guidelines, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg/New-York/Dordrecht/London. ISBN 978-3-642-36723-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Torzilli G (2005) Adverse effects associated with SonoVue use. Expert Opin Drug Saf 4:399–401

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Valentini AL, De Gaetano AM, Destito C et al (2002) The accuracy of voiding urosonography in detecting vesico-ureteral reflux: a summary of existing data. Eur J Pediatr 161:380–384

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Valentino M, Serra C, Pavlica P et al (2008) Blunt abdominal trauma: diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced US in children – initial experience. Radiology 246:903–909

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Webb JAW (2014) Pregnancy and lactation: intravascular use of contrast media. In: Thomsen HS, Webb JAW (eds) Contrast media: safety issues and ESUR guidelines, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg/New-York/Dordrecht/London, pp 113–121. ISBN 978-3-642-36723-6

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerin JM (1992) Contrast studies of the gastrointestinal tract in the neonate. Semin Pediatr Surg 1:284–295

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Riccabona MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Riccabona, M., Mentzel, HJ. (2018). Contrast Agents in Childhood: Application and Safety Considerations. In: Riccabona, M. (eds) Pediatric Urogenital Radiology. Medical Radiology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39202-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39202-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39200-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39202-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics