Abstract
Safe and effective delivery of IV sedatives and anesthetics for Out of Operating Room Anesthesia (OORA) is based on the same principles that govern delivery of these medications in the OR settings, while taking into account the unique conditions imposed by the diverse environments of each of the procedural locations. This entails understanding, and implementing, all applicable scientific, technological, regulatory, and organizational principles in order to enhance patient safety and operational efficiency. Delivering OORA poses physical and operational constraints, in the forms of limited lighting; excessive noise; limited access by the clinician to the patient; and limited devise allowance into OORA sites, e.g., MRI suite; disorganized scheduling and inadequate patient preparation.
The benefits of understanding operational principles of OORA extend to OR and ICU settings as many OR suites are becoming increasingly hybrid environments, e.g., OR MRI or OR-bi-plane angiography, and OR electrophysiology; and as many procedures are performed in ICU settings, e.g., percutaneous tracheotomy tube insertion and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube insertions. The portability and versatility of IV anesthetics and sedatives make them particularly suitable choices for OORA. Technological advances in drug delivery of IV anesthetic and sedatives, in the forms of programmable drug delivery devices, and target-controlled infusion (TCI) systems, enhance the utility of IV anesthetics and sedatives in the OORA environment and extends as well to the OR and intensive care units (ICU).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Vuyk J, Lim T, Engbers FH, Burm AG, Vletter AA, Bovill JG. The pharmacodynamic interaction of propofol and alfentanil during lower abdominal surgery in women. Anesthesiology. 1995;83(1):8–22.
Committee on Standards and Practice Parameters, Apfelbaum JL, Connis RT, Nickinovich DG, American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation, Pasternak LR, Arens JF, Caplan RA, Connis RT, Fleisher LA, Flowerdew R, Gold BS, Mayhew JF, Nickinovich DG, Rice LJ, Roizen MF, Twersky RS. Practice advisory for preanesthesia evaluation: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Preanesthesia Evaluation. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(3):522–38.
American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Sedation and Analgesia by Non-Anesthesiologists. Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists. Anesthesiology. 2002;96(4):1004–17.
Apfelbaum JL, Caplan RA, Barker SJ, Connis RT, Cowles C, Ehrenwerth J, Nickinovich DG, Pritchard D, Roberson DW, Caplan RA, Barker SJ, Connis RT, Cowles C, de Richemond AL, Ehrenwerth J, Nickinovich DG, Pritchard D, Roberson DW, Wolf GL, American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Operating Room Fires. Practice advisory for the prevention and management of operating room fires: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Operating Room Fires. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(2):271–90.
Struys MM, De Smet T, Glen JI, Vereecke HE, Absalom AR, Schnider TW. The history of target-controlled infusion. Anesth Analg. 2016;122(1):56–69.
Short TG, Hannam JA, Laurent S, Campbell D, Misur M, Merry AF, Tam YH. Refining target-controlled infusion: an assessment of pharmacodynamic target-controlled infusion of propofol and remifentanil using a response surface model of their combined effects on bispectral index. Anesth Analg. 2016;122(1):90–7.
Absalom AR, Glen JI, Zwart GJ, Schnider TW, Struys MM. Target-controlled infusion: a mature technology. Anesth Analg. 2016;122(1):70–8.
Schnider TW, Minto CF, Struys MM, Absalom AR. The safety of target-controlled infusions. Anesth Analg. 2016;122(1):79–85.
Leslie K, Clavisi O, Hargrove J. Target-controlled infusion versus manually-controlled infusion of propofol for general anaesthesia or sedation in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(3):CD006059.
Russell D, Wilkes MP, Hunter SC, Glen JB, Hutton P, Kenny GN. Manual compared with target-controlled infusion of propofol. Br J Anaesth. 1995;75(5):562–6.
Moerman AT, Herregods LL, De Vos MM, Mortier EP, Struys MM. Manual versus target-controlled infusion remifentanil administration in spontaneously breathing patients. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(3):828–34.
Puri GD, Mathew PJ, Biswas I, Dutta A, Sood J, Gombar S, Palta S, Tsering M, Gautam PL, Jayant A, Arora I, Bajaj V, Punia TS, Singh G. A multicenter evaluation of a closed-loop anesthesia delivery system: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2016;122(1):106–14.
Chiang MH, Wu SC, You CH, Wu KL, Chiu YC, Ma CW, Kao CW, Lin KC, Chen KH, Wang PC, Chou AK. Target-controlled infusion vs. manually controlled infusion of propofol with alfentanil for bidirectional endoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Endoscopy. 2013;45(11):907–14.
Breslin DS, Mirakhur RK, Reid JE, Kyle A. Manual versus target-controlled infusions of propofol. Anaesthesia. 2004;59(11):1059–63.
Sakaguchi M, Higuchi H, Maeda S, Miyawaki T. Dental sedation for patients with intellectual disability: a prospective study of manual control versus Bispectral Index-guided target-controlled infusion of propofol. J Clin Anesth. 2011;23(8):636–42.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Charchaflieh, J.G., Ganatra, M., Springer, E. (2017). Principles of Delivery of Sedatives and Intravenous Anesthetics in Out of Operating Room Anesthesia. In: Goudra, B.G., Singh, P.M. (eds) Out of Operating Room Anesthesia. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39150-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39150-2_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39148-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39150-2
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)