Skip to main content

Comparing Modeling Approaches for the Multi-Level Capacitated Lot-Sizing and Scheduling Problem

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dynamic Perspectives on Managerial Decision Making

Part of the book series: Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance ((DMEF,volume 22))

  • 1314 Accesses

Abstract

Determining lot sizes is an essential step during the material requirements planning phase influencing total production cost and total throughput time of a production system. It is well-known that lot-sizing and scheduling decisions are intertwined. Neglecting this relation, as it is done in the classical hierarchical planning approach, leads to inefficient and sometimes infeasible plans. In this work we compare different approaches for integrating the lot-sizing and the scheduling decisions in multi-stage systems. We show their abilities and limitations in describing relevant aspects of a production environment. By applying the models to benchmark instances we analyze their computational behavior. The structural and numerical comparisons show that there are considerable differences between the approaches although all models aim to describe the same planning problem. The results provide a guideline for selecting the right modeling approach for different planning situations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The actual processing time of a lot usually takes only a small fraction of a macro-period.

References

  • Almeder, C., Klabjan, D., Traxler, R., & Almada-Lobo, B. (2015). Lead time considerations for the multi-level capacitated lot-sizing problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 241(3), 727–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billington, P. J., McClain, J. O., & Thomas, L. J. (1983). Mathematical programming approaches to capacity-constrained MRP systems: Review, formulation and problem reduction. Management Science, 29(10), 1126–1141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bitran, G. R., & Yanasse, H. H. (1982). Computational complexity of the capacitated lot size problem. Management Science, 28(10), 1174–1186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buschkühl, L., Sahling, F., Helber, S., & Tempelmeier, H. (2010). Dynamic capacitated lot-sizing problems: A classification and review of solution approaches. OR Spectrum, 32(2), 231–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dauzère-Pérès, S., & Lasserre, J.-B. (2002). On the importance of sequencing decisions in production planning and scheduling. International Transactions in Operational Research, 9, 779–793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drexl, A., & Kimms, A. (1997). Lot sizing and scheduling - survey and extensions. European Journal of Operational Research, 99(2), 221–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fandel, G., & Stammen-Hegene, C. (2006, December). Simultaneous lot sizing and scheduling for multi-product multi-level production. International Journal of Production Economics, 104(2), 308–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann, B., & Meyr, H. (1997). The general lotsizing and scheduling problem. OR Spektrum, 19, 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haase, K. (1994). Lotsizing and scheduling for production planning. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems (Vol. 408). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Jeong, H.-I., & Park, J. (2008). Integrated model for production planning and scheduling in a supply chain using benchmarked genetic algorithm. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 39, 1207–1226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimms, A., & Drexl, A. (1998). Some insights into proportional lot sizing and scheduling. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 49(11), 1196–1205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahling, F., Buschkühl, L., Tempelmeier, H., & Helber, S. (2009). Solving a multi-level capacitated lot sizing problem with multi-period setup carry-over via a fix-and-optimize heuristic. Computers & Operations Research, 36, 2546–2553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeanner, F., & Meyr, H. (2013). Multi-stage simultaneous lot-sizing and scheduling for flow line production. OR Spectrum, 35(1), 33–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stadtler, H. (2011). Multi-level single machine lot-sizing and scheduling with zero lead times. European Journal of Operational Research, 209, 241–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suerie, C., & Stadtler, H. (2003). The capacitated lot-sizing problem with linked lot sizes. Management Science, 49(8), 1039–1054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tempelmeier, H., & Buschkühl, L. (2009). A heuristic for the dynamic multi-level capacitated lotsizing problem with linked lotsizes for general product structures. OR Spectrum, 31, 385–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, H. M., & Whitin, T. M. (1958). Dynamic version of the economic lot size model. Management Science, 5, 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The author wants to thank Renate Traxler for performing the numerical experiments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christian Almeder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Almeder, C. (2016). Comparing Modeling Approaches for the Multi-Level Capacitated Lot-Sizing and Scheduling Problem. In: Dawid, H., Doerner, K., Feichtinger, G., Kort, P., Seidl, A. (eds) Dynamic Perspectives on Managerial Decision Making. Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39120-5_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics