Abstract
In this paper we present an application of the dynamic tracking games framework to a monetary union. We use a small stylized nonlinear two-country macroeconomic model (MUMOD1) of a monetary union to analyse the interactions between fiscal (governments) and monetary (common central bank) policy makers, assuming different objective functions of these decision makers. Using the OPTGAME algorithm we calculate solutions for two game strategies: a cooperative solution (Pareto optimal) and a non-cooperative equilibrium solution (the Nash game for the feedback information pattern). We show how the policy makers react to demand shocks under non-cooperation and cooperation scenarios. The cooperative solution dominates the non-cooperative solution in all scenarios, which may be interpreted as an argument for coordinating fiscal and monetary policies in a monetary union in a situation of high public debt such as in the recent sovereign debt crisis in Europe.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Acocella, N., Di Bartolomeo, G., & Hughes Hallett, A. (2013). The theory of economic policy in a strategic context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Basar, T., & Olsder, G. J. (1999). Dynamic noncooperative game theory (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: SIAM.
Behrens, D. A., & Neck, R. (2015). Approximating solutions for nonlinear dynamic tracking games. Computational Economics, 45, 407–433.
Blueschke, D., & Neck, R. (2011). “Core” and “periphery” in a monetary union: A macroeconomic policy game. International Advances in Economic Research, 17, 334–346.
Blueschke, D., Neck, R., & Behrens, D. A. (2013). OPTGAME3: A dynamic game solver and an economic example. In V. Krivan & G. Zaccour (Eds.), Advances in dynamic games. Theory, applications, and numerical methods (pp. 29–51). Basel: Birkhäuser.
Feichtinger, G., & Hartl, R. (1986). Optimale Kontrolle ökonomischer Prozesse. Anwendungen des Maximumprinzips in den Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
Krause, M. U., & Moyen, S. (2013). Public debt and changing inflation targets. Discussion Paper 20/2013, Bundesbank.
Neck, R., & Blueschke, D. (2014). “Haircuts” for the EMU periphery: Virtue or vice? Empirica, 41(2), 153–175.
Petit, M. L. (1990). Control theory and dynamic games in economic policy analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Aarle, B., Di Bartolomeo, G., Engwerda, J., & Plasmans, J. (2002). Monetary and fiscal policy design in the EMU: An overview. Open Economies Review, 13(4), 321–340.
Acknowledgements
Thanks are due to an anonymous referee for helpful suggestions for improvement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blueschke, D., Neck, R. (2016). Fiscal and Monetary Policies in a Monetary Union: Conflict or Cooperation?. In: Dawid, H., Doerner, K., Feichtinger, G., Kort, P., Seidl, A. (eds) Dynamic Perspectives on Managerial Decision Making. Dynamic Modeling and Econometrics in Economics and Finance, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39120-5_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39120-5_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-39118-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-39120-5
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)