Skip to main content

Analytics and Findings for Overall Competency

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 716 Accesses

Abstract

As Chap. 4 describes, QCA uses Boolean algebra and set relationships, rather than correlations between dependent and independent variables. This research investigates the presence or absence of four treatment conditions associated with high decision competence and or decision confidence. The treatment antecedents include (1) group interaction, (2) GBS simulations, (3) DA dissent and (4) competency/incompetency training. The calibration of all antecedent conditions and the outcomes (occurrence of the two phenomena of decision competence OR decision confidence) are defined and calibrated as fuzzy sets, with the resulting membership scores reflecting the level of membership to the set, using theoretical and substantive knowledge of the cases (Ragin, 2008c) as set out in Chaps. 3 and 4. Both presence and absence of antecedent conditions are considered in the configurations of causal conditions. For this study there are two types of antecedent conditions: (2) treatment antecedents and (2) measured antecedents, and these are set out in Table 5.1 below.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bennis, W. G., & O’Toole, J. (2005). How business schools lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 96–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheit, E. F. (1985). Business schools and their critics. California Management Review, 27(3), 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinebell, S. K., & Clinebell, J. M. (2008). The tension in business education between academic rigor and real-world relevance: The role of executive professors. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 7(1), 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiss, P. C. (2009). Practical issues in QCA. Professional development workshop on Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) conducted at the meeting of the Academy of Management. http://www-bcf.usc.edu/~fiss/QCA_PDW_2009_Fiss_Practical_Issues.pdf

  • Kedrovsky, P. (2005). The problem with b-schools. Canadian Business, 78(14/15), 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, J. (2000). Strategies of causal inference in small-N analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 28(4), 387–424. doi:10.1177/0049124100028004001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H., & Lampel, J. (2001). Matter of degrees: Do MBAs make better CEOs? Fortune, 19(February), 244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neelankavil, J. P. (1994). Corporate America’s quest for the ideal MBA. Journal of Management Development, 13(5), 38–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management & Education, 1(1), 78–95. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2002.7373679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L., & McKibbin, I. (1988). Management education and development: Drift into the 21st century. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (1987). The comparative method: Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative Strategies. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2004). Redesigning social inquiry [Slide-show PPT]. http://eprints.ncm.ac.uk/379/1/RSDI-RMF.pdf

  • Ragin, C. C. (2006c). Set relations in social research: Evaluating their consistency and coverage. Political Analysis, 14(3), 291–310. doi:10.1093/pan/mpj019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2007a). Fuzzy sets: Calibration versus measurement. In J. M. Box-Steffensmeier, H. E. Brady, & D. Collier (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political methodology. http://toktok.persiangig.com/other/Calibration%20fuzzy%20measurement.pdf

  • Ragin, C. C. (2007b). Qualitative comparative analysis using fuzzy-sets (fsQCA). In B. Rihoux & C. C. Ragin (Eds.), Configurational comparative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2008a). Online tutorial: Qualitative comparative analysis and fuzzy sets. http://www.fsqca.com

  • Ragin, C. C. (2008c). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2008d). What is qualitative comparative analysis (QCA)? Symposium conducted at the meeting of the 3rd ESRC Research Methods Festival. Retrieved May 5, 2010, from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/250/1/What_is_QCA.pdf

  • Ragin, C. C., & Drass, K. (2008). User’s guide to fuzzy set/qualitative comparative analysis. http://www.u.arizona.edu/~cragin/fsQCA/software.shtml

  • Ragin, C. C., & Rihoux, B. (2004). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA): State of the art and prospects. Qualitative methods. Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Organized Section on Qualitative Methods, 2(2), 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rihoux, B. (2006). Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) and related systematic comparative methods: Recent advances and remaining challenges for social science research. International Sociology, 21(5), 679–706. doi:10.1177/0268580906067836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. C. (2009). Configurational comparative methods. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodside, A. G., & Zhang, M. (2012). Identifying X-consumers using causal recipes: “Whales” and “Jumbo Shrimps” Casino Gamblers. Journal of Gambling Studies, 28(1), 13–26. doi:10.1007/s10899-011-9241-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Woodside, A., de Villiers, R., Marshall, R. (2016). Analytics and Findings for Overall Competency. In: Incompetency and Competency Training. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39108-3_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics