Skip to main content

The Unconscious as a Principally Affective Matter

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Habermas and Ricoeur’s Depth Hermeneutics

Part of the book series: Contributions to Hermeneutics ((CONT HERMEN,volume 3))

  • 335 Accesses

Abstract

Ricoeur’s The Voluntary and the Involuntary must be linked to Merleau-Ponty’s Phenomenology of Perception, first of all because of their common phenomenological “vocation”. Phenomenology of Perception concretely shows the possibility of phenomenology of a broader perspective, of the field of investigation and of application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, for example, Freud 1962b, 253–254: “Many people, as is well known, contest the assumption of complete psychical determinism by appealing to a special feeling of conviction that there is a free will. […] According to our analyses it is not necessary to dispute the right to the feeling of conviction of having a free will. If the distinction between conscious and unconscious motivation is taken into account, our feeling of conviction informs us that conscious motivation does not extend to all our motor decisions. De minimis non curat lex. But what is thus left free by the one side receives its motivation from the other side, from the unconscious; and in this way determination in the psychical sphere is still carried out without any gap”.

  2. 2.

    “What perception does not in any sense include is an explicit judgment of reflection, such as ‘It is I who perceives, I am perceiving’. But apart from such explicit reflection, perception by its nature includes a diffuse presence to the self which is not yet a conscious grasp” (Ricœur 1966, 387).

References

  • Ellenberger, H.F. 1970. The discovery of the unconscious: The history and evolution of dynamic psychiatry. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. 1957c. The unconscious. In: SE, vol. 14: 166–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. 1961d. A note on the unconscious in psychoanalysis. In: SE, vol. 12: 255–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. 1962b. The psychopathology of everyday life. In: SE, vol. 6: 1–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud S. 1964. New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. In: SE, vol. 22: 5–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jervolino, D. 1993. Il cogito e l’ermeneutica. La questione del soggetto in Ricœur. Genova: Marietti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. 1966. In Freedom and nature: The voluntary and the involuntary, ed. E.V. Kohák. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Busacchi, V. (2016). The Unconscious as a Principally Affective Matter. In: Habermas and Ricoeur’s Depth Hermeneutics. Contributions to Hermeneutics, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39010-9_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics