Skip to main content

A Definition of Community Crowdsourcing Engagement and Application

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Blurring the Boundaries Through Digital Innovation

Abstract

Crowdsourcing refers to the use of technologies to gather the collective effort and wisdom from an undefined group of online users for organizational innovation and/or problem solving. A critical challenge for crowdsourcing users and providers is to engage online participants to make sustained contributions. This research in progress paper proposes a behavioural perspective on the definition and measurement of participant engagement in community crowdsourcing, a crowdsourcing model where all participants can see and react to everyone else ideas. In our research, we propose to conceive participant engagement as a set of engaging behaviours and evaluate it through the magnitude, temporal intensity, diversity, and recency of these behaviours. We illustrate the construct operationalization by the Participant Engagement Index (PEI) that quantifies engaging behaviours in the context of MindMixer, a community crowdsourcing service provider. We further provide an initial illustration of the PEI’s utility through the analysis of field project data from MindMixer. We expect that our study will provide guidance for future research into existing and new practices to study and improve the active and sustained participation of crowds in open collaboration forums.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ames, C.: Classrooms: goals, structures, and student motivation. J. Educ. Psychol. 84, 261–271 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Appleton, J.J., Christenson, S.L., Furlong, M.J.: Student engagement with school: critical conceptual and methodological issues of the construct. Psychol. Schools 45(5), 369–386 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Appleton, J.J., Christenson, S.L., Kim, D., Reschly, A.L.: Measuring cognitive and psychological engagement: validation of the student engagement instrument. J. Sch. Psychol. 44(5), 427–445 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Attfield, S., Kazai, G., Lalmas, M., Piwowarski, B.: Towards a science of user engagement. In: Paper presented at UMWA 2011, Workshop on User Modelling for Web Applications, Hong Kong, China, 9–12 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baumeister, R.F., Leary, M.R.: The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117, 497–529 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Belleamme, P., Lambert, T., Schwienbacher, A.: Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of the French Finance Association (AFFI) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bommert, B.: Collaborative innovation in the public sector. Int. Public Manage. Rev. 11(1), 15–33 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bonabeau, E.: Decision 2.0: the power of collective intelligence. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 50(2), 44–52 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Borst: Understanding crowdsourcing: effects of motivation and rewards on participation and performance in voluntary online activities. Ph.D. thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Boudreau, K., Lakhani, K.: How to manage outside innovation. MIT Sloan Manage. Rev. 50(4), 69–76 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brabham, D.C.: Moving the crowd at threadless: motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application. Inform. Commun. Soc. 13(8), 1122–1145 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brabham, D.C.: Motivations for participation in a crowdsourcing application to improve public engagement in transit planning. J. Appl. Commun. Res. 40(3), 307–328 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Brabham, D.C.: Crowdsourcing as a model for problem solving: an introduction and cases, convergence. Int. J. Res. New Media Technol. 14(1), 75–90 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Brodie, R.J., Hollebeek, L.D., Jurić, B., Ilić, A.: Customer engagement conceptual domain, fundamental propositions, and implications for research. J. Serv. Res. 14(3), 252–271 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brophy, J.E.: Socializing students’ motivation to learn. In: Maehr, M.L., Kleiber, D. (eds.) Advances in Motivation and Achievement: Enhancing motivation, pp. 181–210. JAI Press, Greenwich, CT (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Butler, B., Sproull, L., Kiesler, S., Kraut, R.: Community effort in online groups: who does the work and why. In: Weisband, S., Atwater, L. (eds.) Leadership at a distance. Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, Mahwah, NJ, pp. 171–194 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Colbert, M., Boodoo, A.: Does’ Letting go of the words’ increase engagement: a traffic study. In: Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 655–667 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dweck, C., Leggett, E.L.: A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychol. Rev. 95, 256–273 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Eccles (Parsons), J.S., Adler, T.F., Futterman, R., Goff, S.B., Kaczala, C.M., Meece, J.L., et al.: Expectations, values and academic behaviours. In: Spence, J.T. (ed.) Achievement and achievement motivation. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, pp. 75–146 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Epstein, J.L., McPartland, J.M.: The concept and measurement of the quality of school life. Am. Educ. Res. J. 13, 15–30 (1976)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fang, Y., Neufeld, D.: Understanding sustained participation in open source software projects. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 25(4), 9–50 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Fitt, V.A.: Crowdsourcing the news: news organization liability for iReporters. William Mitchell Law Rev. 37(4), 1839–1867 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Fredericks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., Paris, A.H.: School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Rev. Educ. Res. 74, 59–109 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Fredricks, J.A., Eccles, J.S.: Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood to adolescence: growth trajectories in two “male-typed” domains. J. Dev. Psychol. 38, 519–533 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Goh, D., Razikin, K., Lee, C. S., Chua, A.: Investigating user perceptions of engagement and information quality in mobile human computation games. In: Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, pp. 391–392 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Griffin, M.A., Parker, S.K., Neal, A.: Is behavioural engagement a distinct and useful construct. Indus. Organ. Psychol. 1(1), 48–51 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Harter, J.K., Schmidt, F.L., Hayes, T.L.: Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 87, 268–279 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience-a research agenda. Behav. Inform. Technol. 25(2), 91–97 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Howe, J.: The Rise of Crowdsourcing. Wired, (2006) Retrieved April 30 2012 from: http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/14.06/crowds.html

  30. Hristova, D., Mashhadi, A., Quattrone, G., Capra, L.: Mapping community engagement with urban crowd-sourcing. In: Proceedings of When the City Meets the Citizen Workshop, Dublin, Ireland, vol. 4 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Hu, S., Kuh, G.D.: Being (dis) engaged in educationally purposeful activities: the influences of student and institutional characteristics. Res. High. Educ. 43(5), 555–575 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaufmann, N., Schulze, T., Veit, D.: More than fun and money. Worker Motivation in Crowdsourcing-A Study on Mechanical Turk. In: AMCIS, vol. 11, pp. 1–11 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Koda, T., Maes, P.: Agents with faces: the effect of personification. In: 5th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication, 1996, pp. 189–194 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kuh, G.D.: The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual framework and Overview of Psychometric Properties. Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research, Bloomington, IN, pp. 1–26 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Lakhani, K.R., Wolf, R.G.: Why hackers do what they do: understanding motivation and effort in free/open source software projects. Perspect. Free Open Source Softw. 1, 3–22 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lehmann, J., Lalmas, M., Yom-Tov, E., Dupret, G.: Models of user engagement. In: User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization, pp. 164–175. Springer Berlin Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Leimeister, J.M., Huber, M., Bretschneider, U., Krcmar, H.: Leveraging crowdsourcing: activation-supporting components for IT-based ideas competition. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 26(1), 197–224 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lührs, R., Albrecht, S., Lübcke, M., Hohberg, B.: How to grow? online consultation about growth in the city of hamburg: methods, techniques, success factors. In: Traunmüller, R. (ed.) Electronic Government (EGOV 2003), pp. 79–84, LNCS 2739. Springer, Berlin, Germany (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Macey, W.H., Schneider, B.: Engaged in engagement: i am delighted i did it. Indus. Organ. Psychol. 1(1), 76–83 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Macey, W.H., Schneider, B.: The meaning of employee engagement. Indus. Organ. Psychol. 1(1), 3–30 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Massolution: Crowdsourcing Industry Report-Enterprise Crowdsourcing: Market, Provider and Worker Trends, (2012) Retrieved 10/28/2013 from: http://www.crowdsourcing.org/editorial/enterprise-crowdsourcing-research-report-by-massolution/11736 (Last accessed 4/17/2014)

  42. Morgan, J., Wang, R.: Tournaments for ideas. Calif. Manage. Rev. 52(2) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Norman T.C, Bountra C., Edwards A.M., Yamamoto K.R., Friend S.H.: Leveraging crowdsourcing to facilitate the discovery of new medicines. Sci. Trans. Med. 3(88) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  44. O’Brien, H.L., Toms, E.G.: What is user engagement? A conceptual framework for defining user engagement with technology. J. Am. Soc. Inform. Sci. Technol. 59(6), 938–955 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Pope, D.: Doing School: How We are Creating a Generation of Stressed-Out, Materialistic, and Miseducated Students. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Reichheld, F.F., Schefter, P.: E-loyalty. Harvard Bus. Rev. 78(4), 105–113 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., Bakker, A.B.: The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. J. Happiness Stud. 3(1), 71–92 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sundar, S.S., Xu, Q., Bellur, S., Oh, J., Jia, H.: Beyond pointing and clicking: how do newer interaction modalities affect user engagement? In: Proceedings of the 2011 Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1477–1482 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K.N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., Verhoef, P.C.: Customer engagement behaviour: theoretical foundations and research directions. J. Serv. Res. 13(3), 253–266 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Wagner, C., Prasarnphanich, P.: Innovating collaborative content creation: the role of altruism and wiki technology. In: The 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wei, J.T., Lin, S.Y., Wu, H.H.: A review of the application of RFM model. Afr. J. Bus. Manage. 4(19), 4199–4206 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding for this research was provided by the National Science Foundation Grant #1322285.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cuong Nguyen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Nguyen, C., Tahmasbi, N., de Vreede, T., de Vreede, GJ., Oh, O., Reiter-Palmon, R. (2016). A Definition of Community Crowdsourcing Engagement and Application. In: D'Ascenzo, F., Magni, M., Lazazzara, A., Za, S. (eds) Blurring the Boundaries Through Digital Innovation. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38974-5_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics