Skip to main content

Academic Writing, Publishing, and Presentations in Educational Technology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Learning and Knowledge Analytics in Open Education

Abstract

There are many misconceptions about academic writing and publishing that sometimes inhibit or intimidate educational researchers. One misconception is that academic writing should reflect the complexity of challenging scholarly research. As it happens, a complex writing style can detract from the comprehensibility of a manuscript. It is possible to tell a very complex story using simple, descriptive language. Short sentences are often more easily understood than long sentences containing multiple dependent clauses. Academic writing should not result in discovery reading; the reader needs to know the purpose, scope, and major point prior to embarking on the adventure of reading the rest of the manuscript. This document includes some tips on writing clearly for an academic audience along with an editor’s perspective on publishing research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    UUPS = Spector’s Universal Underlying Principle of All Stuff, which is: Something has already gone wrong. Corollary #1: Mistakes rarely happen in isolation; one typically leads to another; best to minimize errors early. Corollary #2: Resources are generally inadequate to accomplish what one believes should be done; this requires prioritization and compromises to be made. Corollary #3: Others usually have better ideas; this requires collaboration and an openness to alternative approaches.

References

  • Spector, J. M., Merrill, M. D., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Driscoll, M. P. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum and AECT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, J. M., Merrill, M. D., Elen, J., & Bishop, M. J. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (4th ed.). New York: Springer and AECT.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tristan E. Johnson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Johnson, T.E., Spector, J.M., Wang, M.(. (2017). Academic Writing, Publishing, and Presentations in Educational Technology. In: Lai, FQ., Lehman, J. (eds) Learning and Knowledge Analytics in Open Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38956-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38956-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38955-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38956-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics