Abstract
Effective instructional design models facilitate active, multi-functional, inspirational, situated approaches to intentional learning. Instructional design is an iterative process of planning performance goals, selecting strategies, choosing media, and conducting evaluation. Proper instructional design is fundamentally student centered, responsive, generative, complex, innovative, authentic, a collaborative process, practical, and inspirational. Good instructional design promotes activities that are creative, systematic, systemic, and cybernetic. Models help us conceptualize representations of reality. A model is a simple representation of more complex forms, processes, and functions of physical phenomena or ideas. Models of necessity simplify reality because often it is too complex to portray and because much of that complexity is unique to specific situations. Although instructional design is a social construction, complexity as a fundamental principle tends to be underestimated, over-simplified, and otherwise insufficiently addressed in many instructional design models. Information is part of the data-information-knowledge continuum with the aim of creating, replacing, improving, or understanding information systems. Information science professionals study and apply the effective use of knowledge within organizations as well as the interaction between people, organizations, and information systems. Information science provides ways to analyze, collect, organize, store, and retrieve data. Therefore, an appropriate instructional design model can facilitate the transition of data to information, and, subsequently, the construction of knowledge. A basic instructional design model for information science is introduced in this paper.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Goel, V., & Pirolli, P. (1992). The structure of design problem spaces. Cognitive Science, 16(3), 395–429.
Merrill, M. D., Drake, L., Lacy, M. J., Pratt, J. & The IID2 Research Group. (1996). Reclaiming instructional design. Educational Technology, 36(5), 5–7.
Ni, X., & Branch, R. (2008). Complexity: Concept, theory and practice within educational communications and technology. In M. J. Spector & M. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Tracey, M. W. (2011). The instructional design knowledge base: Theory, research, and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
Rowe, P. (1987). Design thinking. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Seel, N. (1997). Models of instructional design: Introduction and overview. In R. Tennyson, F. Schott, N. Seel, & S. Dijkstra (Eds.), Instructional design: International perspectives (Vol. 1). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Stock, W. G., & Stock, M. (2013). Handbook of information science. Berlin, Boston, MA: De Gruyter Saur.
Taylor, A. G. (2004). The organization of information (2nd ed.) (Library and information science text series). Westport, Connecticut: Libraries Unlimited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Branch, R.M. (2017). An Instructional Design Model for Information Science. In: Lai, FQ., Lehman, J. (eds) Learning and Knowledge Analytics in Open Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38956-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38956-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38955-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38956-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)