Abstract
Available habitat for the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) varies widely across the species’ broad range and the species’ degree of habitat use specificity is not known; therefore, it is necessary to characterize the species’ habitat use patterns regionally to provide suitable guidelines for wildlife managers to conserve the species throughout its range. Understanding day roost characteristics is particularly important because habitat suitability for Indiana bats is thought to be based on the availability of suitable day roost structures. Despite having been extensively studied at the core of their range, few studies of Indiana bat day roost characteristics have been published from the northeast periphery of the species’ range, and no studies have been published from central New York State, where populations have been in steep decline due to White-Nose Syndrome since 2006. I studied day roosts of 20 female and 7 male Indiana bats in the Ontario Lake Plain northwest of Syracuse, New York, USA during the spring of 2006 and summers of 2007 and 2008 and identified 96 individual Indiana bat roost trees. Indiana bats roosted in 10 species of trees, of which Carya ovata, Acer spp., and Ulmus americana were most frequent. The mean diameter of roost trees was 41.55 ± 7.53 cm, which was similar to roost trees in other regions, but larger than the mean diameter of available trees in the same stands used by roosting Indiana bats. Male and female bats used similarly sized trees. I conclude that size of roost trees in central New York are similar to those throughout the Indiana bat’s range, that the most frequently selected tree species differ regionally, and that patterns of male versus female roost selection varies regionally. This study provides regionally specific quantitative and qualitative metrics by which managers can identify potential Indiana bat habitat for land use planning and conservation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barclay RMR, Kurta A (2007) Ecology and behavior of bats roosting in tree cavities and under bark, pp 17–61. In: Lacki MJ, Hayes JP, Kurta A (eds) Bats in forests: conservation and management. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 352 p
Bluman AG (2006) Elementary statistics: a brief version, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill, New York
Brigham RM (2006) Transmitter attachment for small insectivorous bats (<30 g). Instruction sheet provided by Hollohil Systems, Ltd., Carp, ONT, Canada, 1 p. http://www.holohil.com/bd2att.htm
Britzke ER, Hicks AC, Von Oettingen SL, Darling SR (2006) Description of spring roost trees used by female Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis) in the Lake Champlain Valley of Vermont and New York. Am Midl Nat 155:181–187
Bryce SA, Griffith GE, Omernik JM, Edinger G, Indrick S, Vargas O, Carlson D (2010) Ecoregions of New York (color poster with map, descriptions, summary tables and photographs). US Geological Survey, Reston, VA (map scale 1:1,250,000)
Callahan EV, Drobney RD, Clawson RL (1997) Selection of summer roosting sites by Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis) in Missouri. J Mamm 78(3):818–825
Ford WM, Menzel JM, Menzel MA, Edwards JW (2002) Summer roost tree selection by a male Indiana bat on the Fernow Experimental Forest. Parsons, WV. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station. Research Note NE-378
Foster RW, Kurta A (1999) Roosting ecology of the northern bat (Myotis septentrionalis) and comparisons with the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis). J Mammal 80(2):659–672
Frick WF, Pollock JF, Hicks AC, Langwig KE, Reynolds DS, Turner GG, Butchkoski CM, Kunz TH (2010) An emerging disease causes regional population collapse of a common North American bat species. Science 329:679–682
Humphrey SR (1975) Nursery roosts and community diversity of Nearctic bats. J Mammal 56(2):321–346
Johnson DH (1980) The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61:65–71
Jung TS, Thompson ID, Titman RD (1999) Habitat selection by forest bats in relation to mixed-wood stand types and structure in central Ontario. J Wild Mgt 63(4):1306–1319
King A (2012) 2011 rangewide population estimate for the Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) by USFWS region. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Ecological Services Office, Bloomington. http://www.fws.gov/midwest/endangered/mammals/inba/pdf/2011inbaPopEstimate04Jan12.pdf. Downloaded 04 Jan 2013
Kunz TH, Kurta A (1988) Capture methods and holding devices, pp 1–29. In: Kunz TH (ed) Ecological and behavioral methods for the study of bats. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, 533 pp
Kurta A (2004) Roosting ecology and behavior of Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis) in summer. In: Vories KC, Harrington A (eds) Proceedings of the Indiana bat and coal mining: a technical interactive forum. US Department of the Interior, Office of Surface Mining, Alton, pp 29–38
Kurta A (2002) Roost selection and movements of the endangered Indiana bat. Michigan Academician, Spring 34(1):110
Kurta A, Murray SW (2002) Philopatry and migration of banded Indiana bats (Myotis sodalis) and effects of radio transmitters. J Mammal 83(2):585–589
Kurta A, Murray SW, Miller DH (2002) Roost selection and movements across the summer landscape, pp 118–129. In: Kurta A, Kennedy J (eds) The Indiana Bat: biology and management of an endangered species. Bat Conservation International, Austin, Texas, 253 pp
Kurta A, Kath J, Smith EL, Foster RS, Orick MW, Ross R (1993) A maternity roost of the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) in an unshaded, hollow, sycamore tree (Platanus occidentalis). Am Midl Nat 130:405–407
Loeb SC, Winters EA (2012) Indiana bat summer maternity distribution: effects of current and future climates. Ecol Evol 2013 3(1):103–114
Luensman PS (2005) Myotis sodalis. In: Fire effects information system, (Online). US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory. http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis. Downloaded 12 April 2012
McComb WC, Muller RN (1983) Snag densities in old-growth and second-growth Appalachian forests. J Wildl Manage 47(2):376–382
McDonald JH (2009) Handbook of biological statistics, 2nd edn. Sparky House Publishing, Baltimore
Menzel MA, Menzel JM, Carter TC, Ford WM, Edwards JW (2001) Review of the forest habitat relationships of the Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis). General Technical Report NE-284, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeast Research Station, Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, 21 pp
Perkins JM (1996) Does competition for roosts influence bat distribution in a managed forest? In: Barclay RMR, Brigham RM (eds) Bats and forests. Ministry of Forests. Victoria, British Columbia, pp 164–174
Ritzi CM, Everson BL, Whitaker JO Jr (2005) Use of bat boxes by a maternity colony of Indiana Myotis (Myotis sodalis). Northeast Nat 12(2):217–220
Silvis A, Kniowski AB, Gehrt SD, Ford WM (2014) Roosting and foraging social structure of the endangered Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis). PLoS ONE 9(5):e96937. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0096937
US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2013) Draft revised rangewide Indiana bat summer survey guidelines. US Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Upper Midwest Ecological Services Field Office Website. http://www.fws.gov/midwest/Endangered/mammals/inba/inbasummersurveyguidance.html. Downloaded 9 Jan 2013
US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) (2007) Indiana bat (Myotis sodalis) draft recovery plan: first revision. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Fort Snelling, MN, 258 p
Watrous KS, Donovan TM, Mickey RM, Darling SR, Hicks AC, Von Oettingen SL (2006) Predicting minimum habitat characteristics for the Indiana bat in the Champlain Valley. J Wild Mgt 70(5):1228–1237
Acknowledgments
J.P. Gibbs, J. Frair, and B. Underwood provided invaluable guidance and editing during the preparation of this manuscript. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, New York Field Office (R. Niver), and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (A.C. Hicks and C.J. Herzog) generously provided data and guidance on this project. J.P. Sherlock Fishman assisted with coordination of volunteer field assistants and project logistics. Many individuals assisted with mist netting and radio telemetry, but special recognition is due to P. Browns, S.J. Fishman, T. Rogers, D. Wanke, R. Williams, C. Harkins, D. Joseph, M. Lamendola, D. Johnston, C. Foster, M. Mahaney, T. Reed, M. Dair, J. Martin, and all the Gibbs Lab grad students 2006–2008. This project was funded in part by an Edna Bailey Sussman Foundation Internship Grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fishman, M.S. (2016). Indiana Bat (Myotis sodalis) Day Roost Selection in the Southeastern Ontario Lake Plain of New York State. In: Ortega, J. (eds) Sociality in Bats. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38953-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38953-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38951-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38953-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)