Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measuring Natural Resource Use from the Micro to the Macro Level

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Green Economy Reader

Part of the book series: Studies in Ecological Economics ((SEEC,volume 6))

  • 2208 Accesses

Abstract

Many of today’s most urgent environmental problems are related to the increasing volumes of worldwide production and consumption and the associated use of natural resources. Solid indicators to measure different dimensions of anthropogenic resource use are essential for designing appropriate policy measures for a sustainable management of these resources. Based on a brief review of the current state of the art of resource use indicators, this chapter describes a set of complementary environmental indicators, combining existing measures for the use of materials, water and land as well as emissions of greenhouse gases. This set can be applied consistently from the micro level of products and companies up to the macro level of countries and world regions, where all suggested indicators take a life cycle perspective on production and consumption activities. The set of indicators deals with the issue of the overall scale of the human production and consumption system and can be regarded as a framework of pressure indicators, based on which indicators on different environmental impacts can be derived. Moreover, these pressure indicators are considered as appropriate proxies for the human impact on the environment. The described set of indicators thus covers natural resource use in a comprehensive and complementary manner and can serve as a basis for setting resource-specific targets and evaluating specific resource policies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Indirect flows of imported products have also been termed upstream or embodied flows.

  2. 2.

    This would follow a production-oriented accounting principle, as it is, for example, implemented in the Kyoto protocol.

  3. 3.

    Regional studies are sometimes also termed applications on the meso level.

References

  • Adriaanse A, Bringezu S, Hamond A, Moriguchi Y, Rodenburg E, Rogich D, Schütz H (1997) Resource flows: the material base of industrial economies. World Resource Institute, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Best A, Giljum S, Simmons C, Blobel D, Lewis K, Hammer M, Cavalieri S, Lutter S, Maguire C (2008) Potential of the ecological footprint for monitoring environmental impacts from natural resource use: analysis of the potential of the ecological footprint and related assessment tools for use in the EU’s thematic strategy on the sustainable use of natural resources. Report to the European Commission, DG Environment, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Borucke M, Moore D, Cranston G, Gracey K, Iha K, Larson J, Lazarus E, Morales JC, Wackernagel M, Galli A (2013) Accounting for demand and supply of the biosphere’s regenerative capacity: the national footprint accounts’ underlying methodology and framework. Ecol Indic 24:518–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boulay A-M, Motoshita M, Pfister S, Bulle C, Muñoz I, Franceschini H, Margni M (2015) Analysis of water use impact assessment methods (part A): evaluation of modeling choices based on a quantitative comparison of scarcity and human health indicators. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:139–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bringezu S (2015) Possible target corridor for sustainable use of global material resources. Resources 4:25–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bringezu S, Schütz H, Moll S (2003) Rationale for and interpretation of economy-wide materials flow analysis and derived indicators. J Ind Ecol 7:43–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bringezu S, Sand IVD, Schütz H, Bleischwitz R, Moll S (2009) Analysing global resource use of national and regional economies across various levels. In: Bleischwitz R, Bringezu S (eds) Sustainable resource use. Greenleaf Publishing, Sheffield, pp 10–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruckner M, Fischer G, Tramberend S, Giljum S (2015) Measuring telecouplings in the global land system: a review and comparative evaluation of land footprint accounting methods. Ecol Econ 114:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DESTATIS (2013) Umweltnutzung und Wirtschaft. Bericht zu den Umweltökonomischen Gesamtrechnungen. Statistisches Bundesamt, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2006) Land accounts for Europe 1990–2000. Towards integrated land and ecosystem accounting. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2010) The european environment. State and outlook 2010. Land use. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2015) The european environment. State and outlook 2015. Synthesis report. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen

    Google Scholar 

  • ESSC (2014) European strategy for environmental accounts. ESEA 2014. European Statistical System Committee, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2011) Roadmap to a resource efficient Europe. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2014) Analysis of an EU target for resource productivity. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2015) The Paris protocol – a blueprint for tackling global climate change beyond 2020. European Commission, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROSTAT (2001) Economy-wide material flow accounts and derived indicators. A methodological guide. Statistical Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROSTAT (2008) Revised European strategy for environmental accounting. Statistical Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROSTAT (2010) LUCAS – a multi-purpose land use survey. Statistical Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROSTAT (2013) Economy-wide Material Flow Accounts (EW-MFA). Compilation guide 2013. Statistical Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • EUROSTAT (2014) Material flow accounts. Statistical Office of the European Communities, Luxembourg. Available at http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/nui/show.do?dataset=env_ac_mfa&lang=en

  • Fischer-Kowalski M, Krausmann F, Giljum S, Lutter S, Mayer A, Bringezu S, Moriguchi Y, Schütz H, Schandl H, Weisz H (2011) Methodology and indicators of economy‐wide material flow accounting. J Ind Ecol 15:855–876

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flörke M, Kynast E, Bärlund I, Eisner S, Wimmer F, Alcamo J (2013) Domestic and industrial water uses of the past 60 years as a mirror of socio-economic development: a global simulation study. Glob Environ Chang 23:144–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giljum S, Hak T, Hinterberger F, Kovanda J (2005) Environmental governance in the European Union: strategies and instruments for absolute decoupling. Int J Sustain Dev 8:31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giljum S, Hinterberger F, Lutter S, Polzin C (2009) How to measure Europe’s resource use. An analysis for friends of the Earth Europe. Sustainable Europe Research Institute, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Giljum S, Burger E, Hinterberger F, Lutter S, Bruckner M (2011) A comprehensive set of resource use indicators from the micro to the macro level. Resour Conserv Recycl 55:300–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giljum S, Lutter S, Bruckner M, Aparcana S (2013) State of play of national consumption-based indicators. A review and evaluation of available methods and data to calculate footprint-type (consumption-based) indicators for materials, water, land and carbon. Report for DG Environment of the European Commission. Sustainable Europe Research Institute (SERI), Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Giljum S, Dittrich M, Lieber M, Lutter S (2014) Global patterns of material flows and their socio-economic and environmental implications: a MFA study on all countries world-wide from 1980 to 2009. Resources 3:319–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giljum S, Martinez A, Bruckner M (2015) Material footprint assessment in a global input–output framework. J Ind Ecol 19(5):792–804

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberl H, Fischer-Kowalski M, Krausmann F, Weisz H, Winiwarter V (2004) Progress towards sustainability? What the conceptual framework of material and energy flow accounting (MEFA) can offer. Land Use Policy 21:199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinberg R (2007) Peak everything: waking up to the century of declines. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertwich EG, Peters GP (2009) Carbon footprint of nations: a global, trade-linked analysis. Environ Sci Technol 43:6414–6420

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra AY, Mekonnen MM (2012) The water footprint of humanity. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:3232–3237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK, Aldaya M, Mekonnen M (2009) Water footprint manual. State of the art 2009. Water Footprint Network, Enschede

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK, Aldaya MM, Mekonnen MM (2011) The water footprint assessment manual. Setting the global standard. Earthscan, London/Washington D.C

    Google Scholar 

  • Huijbregts MAJ, Rombouts LJA, Hellweg S, Frischknecht R, Hendriks AJ, van de Meent D, Ragas AMJ, Reijnders L, Struijs J (2005) Is cumulative fossil energy demand a useful indicator for the environmental performance of products? Environ Sci Technol 40:641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISO (2012) Carbon footprint of products – requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication. ISO/DIS 14067.2. International Organization for Standardization

    Google Scholar 

  • JRC (2010) Decoupling indicators, basket-of-products indicators, waste management indicators: framework, methodology, data basis and updating procedures. European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra

    Google Scholar 

  • JRC (2012) Life cycle indicators for resources, products and waste. European Commission Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra

    Google Scholar 

  • Kastner T, Rivas MJI, Koch W, Nonhebel S (2012) Global changes in diets and the consequences for land requirements for food. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109:6868–6872

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kneese AV, Ayres RU, d’Arge RC (1970) Economics and the environment: a material balance approach. John Hopkins Press, Baltimore/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Krausmann F, Weisz H, Eisenmenger N, Schütz H, Haas W, Schaffartzik A (2015) Economy-wide material flow accounting. Introduction and guide. Social Ecology Working Paper. Institute for Social Ecology, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutter S, Giljum S (2014) Demand-based measures of material flows. A review and comparative assessment of existing calculation methods and data options. OECD / Working Party on Environmental Information, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews E, Bringezu S, Fischer-Kowalski M, Huetller W, Kleijn R, Moriguchi Y, Ottke C, Rodenburg E, Rogich D, Schandl H, Schuetz H, van der Voet E, Weisz H (2000) The weight of nations. Material outflows from industrial economies. World Resources Institute, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Mekonnen M, Hoekstra A (2013) Water footprint benchmark for crop production. A first global assessment. Ecol Indic 46:214–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2007) Measuring material flows and resource productivity. The OECD guide environment directorate. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters GP (2010) Carbon footprints and embodied carbon at multiple scales. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2:245–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfister S, Koehler A, Hellweg S (2009) Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA. Environ Sci Technol 43:4098–4104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radermacher W, (1992) Konzept fuer eine umweltoekonomische Gesamtrechnung des Statistischen Bundesamtes. National German Statitical Agency

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritthof M, Rohn H, Liedtke C (2002) Calculating MIPS. Resource productivity of products and services. Wuppertal Institut, Wuppertal

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruini L, Marino M, Pignatelli S, Laio F, Ridolfi L (2013) Water footprint of a large-sized food company: the case of Barilla pasta production. Water Resour Ind 1:7–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Saurat M, Ritthoff M (2013) Calculating MIPS 2.0. Resources 2:581–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schandl H, West J (2010) Resource use and resource efficiency in the Asia–Pacific region. Glob Environ Chang 20:636–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schandl H, Grünbühel C, Haberl H, Weisz H (2002) Handbook of physical accounting – measuring bio-physical dimensions of socio-economic activities MFA – EFA – HANPP. Institute for Social Ecology, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Bleek F (1992) MIPS – a universal ecological measure. Fresenius Environ Bull 2:407–412

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Bleek F, Bringezu S, Hinterberger F, Liedtke C, Spangenberg J, Stiller H, Welfens M (1998) MAIA. Einführung in die Materialintensitätsanalyse nach dem MIPS-Konzept. Birkhauser, Berlin, Basel

    Google Scholar 

  • Seppelt R, Manceur AM, Liu J, Fenichel EP, Klotz S (2014) Synchronized peak-rate years of global resources use. Ecol Soc 19:50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt K, Tignor M, Miller H (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth IPCC assessment report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

    Google Scholar 

  • Spangenberg J (1995) Sustainable Europe. The study. Friends of the Earth, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Steen-Olsen K, Weinzettel J, Cranston G, Ercin AE, Hertwich EG (2012) Carbon, land, and water footprint accounts for the European Union: consumption, production, and displacements through international trade. Environ Sci Technol 46:10883–10891

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tukker A, Bulavskaya T, Giljum S, de Koning A, Lutter S, Simas M, Stadler K, Wood R (2014) The global resource footprint of nations. Carbon, water, land and materials embodied in trade and final consumption, Leiden/Delft/Vienna/Trondheim

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2003) Evaluation of environmental impacts in life cycle assessment. United Nations Environment Programme

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2009) Towards sustainable production and use of resources: assessing biofuels. International Panel for Sustainable Resource Management

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2012) Global environmental outlook 5. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2012a) SEEA-W. System of Environmental-Economic Accounting for Water. United Nations Statistics Division

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2012b). System of environmental-economic accounting. Central Framework. United Nations Statistical Division, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Voet E, van Oers L, Moll S, Schütz H, Bringezu S, de Bruyn S, Sevenster M, Warringa G (2005) Policy review on decoupling: development of indicators to assess decoupling of economic development and environmental pressure in the EU-25 and AC-3 countries. EU Commission, DG Environment, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Voet E, van Oers L, de Bruyn S, de Jong F, Tukker A (2009) Environmental impact of the use of natural resources and products. CML, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinzettel J, Hertwich EG, Peters GP, Steen-Olsen K, Galli A (2013) Affluence drives the global displacement of land use. Glob Environ Chang 23:433–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West J, Schandl H (2013) Material use and material efficiency in Latin America and the Caribbean. Ecol Econ 94:19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiedmann T, Minx J (2007) A definition of ‘Carbon Footprint’. ISA/UK Research & Consulting, Durham

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedmann T, Schandl H, Lenzen M, Moran D, Suh S, West J, Kanemoto K (2015) The material footprint of nations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:6271–6276

    Google Scholar 

  • WU (2015) Global material flow database. Material extraction data. Technical report, Version 2015.1. Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU), Vienna. www.materialflows.net

  • WWF, Global Footprint Network, Water Footprint Network, Zoological Society of London (2014) Living planet report 2014. Species and spaces, people and places. WWF, Gland, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu Y, Feng K, Hubacek K (2013) Tele-connecting local consumption to global land use. Glob Environ Chang 23:1178–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Ecological Economics, Vienna University of Economics and Business (WU), Vienna, Austria

    Stefan Giljum, Stephan Lutter & Martin Bruckner

Authors
  1. Stefan Giljum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephan Lutter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Martin Bruckner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Giljum .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Environment Europe Ltd, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom

    Stanislav Shmelev

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Giljum, S., Lutter, S., Bruckner, M. (2017). Measuring Natural Resource Use from the Micro to the Macro Level. In: Shmelev, S. (eds) Green Economy Reader. Studies in Ecological Economics, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38919-6_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation