Skip to main content

Multidimensional Assessment of Sustainability: Harmony vs. the Turning Point

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Green Economy Reader

Part of the book series: Studies in Ecological Economics ((SEEC,volume 6))

  • 2202 Accesses

Abstract

Multidimensional assessment of sustainability is a way to reconcile the need for simultaneous consideration of various indicators of progress beyond GDP growth with a policy focused visualization of multi-dimensional trends in a clear and transparent manner. The various composite measures used for sustainability assessment often hide the trade-offs between economic, social and environmental dimensions of sustainability. This chapter discusses indicators used for sustainability analysis at the macro scale and offers a multi-criteria sustainability assessment framework. It discusses results that were obtained in sustainability assessments for the USA, Brazil, China, France, Germany, Britain and Russia. The Multicriteria Decision Aid tool, Aggregated Preference Index System (APIS) is used for the assessment with the following three headline indicators: GDP per capita; CO2 emissions and Life Expectancy at birth. The indicators represent economic, environmental and social dimensions respectively. The multidimensional assessment is designed with two different policy priorities: priority of economic over environmental and social dimension versus priority of environmental and social dimensions over economic. Results help to identify countries, where economic development happened at the expense of environmental and social dimension and lead to policy conclusions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anselin A, Meire PM, Anselin L (1989) Multi-criteria techniques in ecological evaluation: an example using the analytical hierarchy process. Biol Conserv 49(3):215–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castaneda B. (1999) An index of sustainable economic welfare (ISEW) for Chile. Ecol Econ 28:231–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • COM (2001) 264. 15.5.2001. Communication from the commission. ‘A Sustainable Europe for a Better World: A European Union Strategy for Sustainable Development’ (Commission’s proposal to the Gothenburg European Council). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/en/com/2001/com2001_0264en01.pdf

  • EEA (1999) Environment in the European Union at the turn of the century

    Google Scholar 

  • EEA (2003) Environmental indicators: typology and use in reporting

    Google Scholar 

  • Encyclopaedia of the Earth (2006) Kyoto protocol and the United States. http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/154065/

  • Hovanov NV, Yudaeva M, Hovanov K (2009) Multicriteria estimation of probabilities on basis of expert non-numeric, non-exact and non-complete knowledge. Eur J Oper Res 195(3):857–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez-Alier J, Munda G, O’Neill J (1998) Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics. Ecol Econ 26:277–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Max-Neef M (1995) Economic growth and quality of life: a threshold hypothesis. Ecol Econ 15:115–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munda G (1995) Multicriteria evaluation in a fuzzy environment. Theory and applications in ecological economics, Contributions to economics Series. Physica-Verlag, Heidelberg, 255 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1993) OECD core set of indicators for environmental performance reviews. A synthesis report by the group on the state of the environment. OECD, Paris, 35 pp.Polenske, K.R. & Lin, X., 1993. Conserving energy to reduce carbon dioxide emissions in China. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 4(2), pp.249–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisano U, Lepuschitz K, Berger G (2013) National sustainable development strategies in Europe 2013. Taking stock and exploring new developments. ESDN Q Rep 29:32

    Google Scholar 

  • Rath-Nagel S, Stocks K (1982) Energy modelling for technology assessment: the MARKAL approach. Omega 10(5):493–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy B (1985) Méthodologie multicritère d’aide à la décision. Economica, Paris, 699 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy B (1991) The outranking approach and the foundation of electre methods. Theor Decis 31:49–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy B (1996) Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 293 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy B, Vincke P (1981) Multicriteria analysis: survey and new directions. Eur J Oper Res 8:207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shmelev S (2010) Environmentally extended input–output analysis of the UK economy: key sector analysis

    Google Scholar 

  • Shmelev S (2011) Dynamic sustainability assessment: the case of Russia in the period of transition (1985–2008). Ecol Econ 70(11):2039–2049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shmelev S (2012) Ecological economics: sustainability in practice. Springer, Dordrecht, 248 pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shmelev SE, Rodríguez-Labajos B (2009) Dynamic multidimensional assessment of sustainability at the macro level: the case of Austria. Ecol Econ 68(10):2560–2573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shmelev SE, Shmeleva IA (2009) Sustainable cities: problems of integrated interdisciplinary research. Int J Sustain Dev 12(1):4–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN (1992) Agenda 21, Programme of action for sustainable development, adopted at the United Nations conference on environment and development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (1996) United Nations, indicators of sustainable development framework and methodologies. United Nations Sales Publication No.E.96.II.A.16, New York, August 1996

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2007) Indicators of sustainable development, guidelines and methodologies, 3rd edn. United Nations Department for Economic and Social Affairs, Division for Sustainable Development, http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/csd/review.htm

  • UN (2012) Sustainable development goals. http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/

  • UNEP (2007) GEO 4. Global environmental outlook report. http://www.unep.org/geo/GEO4/report/GEO-4_Report_Full_en.pdf

  • WCED (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 416 pp

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stanislav Shmelev .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Shmelev, S. (2017). Multidimensional Assessment of Sustainability: Harmony vs. the Turning Point. In: Shmelev, S. (eds) Green Economy Reader. Studies in Ecological Economics, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38919-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics