Abstract
This chapter introduces a Scandinavian and European tradition of institutional economics as an alternative non-orthodox branch of economics that claims relevance in addressing sustainable development issues. The challenge of sustainable development is complex. Existing development trends are unsustainable in more ways than one, for example concerning climate change, loss of biological diversity, depletion of fish stocks, risks of nuclear accidents. When attempting to deal with these issues, it is often assumed that we can rely on science and on economics in particular. Economics claims to supply a conceptual framework and theory for efficient resource allocation at various levels; at the level of individuals, of business corporations and of society.
University departments of economics educate students in one way, nationally and globally, so called neoclassical economics. This theory can offer some ideas about how to deal with sustainability issues. But neoclassical theory has been dominant in a period when serious problems related to sustainability have emerged. It is therefore probably wise to also consider alternatives to neoclassical theory, such as institutional economics. In the present essay I will – while pointing in the direction of institutional theory – suggest a way of opening up economics to make the field more compatible with democracy. Economics has to move from the present monism to pluralism and become more sensitive to value or ideological issues in present society.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Bryan Norton is not alone in using ‘ideology’ in a negative sense. For a history of the word ideology, see MacKenzie (1994).
- 2.
Any tendency to connect ’political economics’ exclusively with Marxist economics is here rejected. Marxist economics is just one kind of political economics among other schools.
References
Boulding KE (1966) The economics of the coming spaceship earth. In: Jarret H (ed) Environmental quality in a growing economy. John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, pp 3–14
Connolly WE (1993) The terms of political discourse, 3rd edn. Blackwell, Oxford
Costanza R (ed) (1991) The science and management of sustainability. Columbia University Press, New York
Funtowicz S, Ravetz J (1991) A new scientific methodology for global environmental issues. In: Costanza R (ed) Ecological economics: the science and management of sustainability. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 137–151
Funtowicz S, Ravetz J (1994) The worth of a songbird: ecological economics as a post-normal science. Ecol Econ 10:197–207
Hajer MA (1995) The politics of environmental discourse. Ecological modernization and the policy process. Clarendon Press, London
International Student Initiative for Pluralism in Economics (2014) Available at: www.isipe.net/open-letter/
Kapp KW (1976) The nature and significance of institutional economics. Kyklos 29(2):209–232, April
Kapp KW (1970) Environmental disruption: general issues and methodological problems. Soc Sci Inf (International Social Science Council) 9(4): 15–32
MacKenzie I (1994) Introduction. The arena of ideology. In: Eccleshall R, Vincent G, Jay R, Kenny M, MacKenzie I, Welford R (eds) Political ideologies. An introduction, 2nd edn. Routledge, London, pp 1–27
Mankiw NG (2009) Principles of economics. Cengage Learning, Andover
Mankiw NG, Taylor MP (2011) Economics. Cengage Learning, Andover
March JG (1994) A primer on decision making: how decisions happen. The Free Press, New York
Mishan EJ (1971) Cost-benefit analysis. Allen & Unwin, London
Mishan EJ (1980) How valid are economic evaluations of allocative changes? J Econ Iss 14(1):143–161
Myrdal G (1978) Institutional economics. J Econ Iss 12(4):771–783
Norton BG (2005) Sustainability: a philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Sagoff M (1988) The economy of the earth: philosophy, law and the environment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Samuelson P (1948) Economics. McGraw-Hill, New York
Schumacher EF (1973) Small is beautiful: a study of economics as if people mattered. Arcus, London
Söderbaum P (1982) Ecological imperatives for public policy. Ceres: FAO Rev Agric Dev 15(2):28–30
Söderbaum P (2006) Democracy and sustainable development. What is the alternative to cost-benefit analysis? Integr Environ Assess Manag 2(2):182–190, April
Söderbaum P (2008) Understanding sustainability economics: towards pluralism in economics. Earthscan/Routledge, London
Söderbaum P, Brown J (2010) Democratizing economics: pluralism as a path toward sustainability. Ann N Y Acad Sci, Ecological Economics Reviews 1185(1): 179–195
Söderbaum P, Brown J (2011) Pluralism and democracy in economics. Int J Pluralism Econ Educ 2(3):240–243
World commission on Environment and Development (1987) (The Brundtland Report) Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Söderbaum, P. (2017). How Economics Can Become Compatible with Democracy. In: Shmelev, S. (eds) Green Economy Reader. Studies in Ecological Economics, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38919-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38919-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38917-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38919-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)