Abstract
Through their approaches, interest groups have the ability to influence scalar politics and temporality at the transboundary river basin level. Researchers usually conceive of scale and time in a particular manner. Scale is usually represented as a hierarchical level or size of a geographic area. The case of interest groups in the proposed Epupa debate indicated that hydropolitics and water governance can take place at a multitude of sites. This means that scalar politics can occur at the traditional state-centric hierarchical level and the horizontal scale where non-state actors exert influence over state actors. The transnational role and involvement of interest groups have not only had an impact on scalar politics, but also temporality. Interest groups have influenced events in the Kunene River basin to such an extent that researchers can no longer ignore their transnational role and involvement. Should researchers do so, it could create a situation where certain state-centric events will play a role in hydropolitics and water governance, like the negotiation and signing of treaties, the researching and writing of feasibility studies and the construction of dams. This means that history will no longer be viewed as teacher, but also as narrative and representation, as in the case of the OvaHimba’s campaign against the planned dam. How we view scale and time can have implications for how we understand reality and the policies developed to react to opportunities and problems in that reality.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bulkeley, H. (2005). Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks. Political Geography, 24(8), 875–902.
Conley, A. H. (1995, November). A synoptic view of water resources in Southern Africa’, paper delivered at the conference of Southern Africa foundation for economic research on integrated development of regional water resources. Paper presented in Nyanga, Zimbabwe.
Conley, A. H. (1996, July). The need to develop the water resources of Southern Africa. Paper delivered at the Vic Falls conference on aquatic systems, Zimbabwe.
Conley, A. H., & van Niekerk, P. H. (1997). Sustainable management of international waters: The Orange River case. Pretoria: Department of Water Affairs and Forestry.
Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Glencross, A. (2015). From ‘doing history’ to thinking historically: Historical consciousness across history and international relations. International Relations, doi:10.1177/0047117815608233.
Goldacre, B. (2009). Bad science. London: Fourth Estate.
Gupta, J., & Bavinck, M. (2014). Towards an elaborated theory of legal pluralism and aquatic resources. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 11, 86–93.
Helgason, K. Sv., & Mahn, T. (2014). Governance of United Nations development: Recharging multilateral cooperation for the post-2015 era. New York: United Nations.
Heyns, P. (1995). Existing and planned water development projects on international rivers within the SADC region’, Paper delivered at the Conference of SADC Ministers responsible for water resources management, 23-24 November 1995. South Africa: Pretoria.
Heyns, P. (2003). Water-resources management in Southern Africa. In M. Nakayama (Ed.), International waters in Southern Africa. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
Hobson, J. M., & Seabrooke, L. (2007). Everyday IPE: Revealing everyday forms of change in the world economy. In J. M. Hobson & L. Seabrooke (Eds.), Everyday politics of the world economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Isaacman, A. F., & Isaacman, B. S. (2014). Dams, displacement, and the delusion of development: Cahora Bassa and its legacies in Mozambique, 1965–2007. Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press.
Jacobs, I. M. (2006). The water war debate: Swimming upstream or downstream in the Okavango and the Nile? Master’s Dissertation, University of Stellenbosch, Stellenbosch.
Kgomongoe, M., & Meissner, R. (2004). The revised protocol on Shared Watercourses and the management of water resources in SADC. In the South African Yearbook of International Affairs 2003/04. Johannesburg: South African Institute of International Affairs.
Kooiman, J., & Bavinck, M. (2013). Theorizing governability—the interactive governance perspective. In M. Bavinck, R. Chuenpagdee, S. Jentoft, & J. Kooiman (Eds.), Governability of fisheries and aquaculture: Theory and applications. Dordrecht: Springer.
Kunene River Awareness Kit (Kunene RAK). (2016). The river awareness kit approach. Victoria: Hatfield Consultants. Accessed January 19, 2016, from www.riverawarenesskit.com/KuneneRAK-DVD.
Kurki, M., & Wight, C. (2013). International relations and social science. In T. Dunne, M. Kurki, & S. Smith (Eds.), International relations theories: Discipline and diversity (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lackenbauer, H. (2013). Trafficking and smuggling in human beings. In M. Eriksson, E. Lindberg, & M. Utas (Eds.), Illicit flows and African security. The Nordic Africa Institute: Stockholm.
Lake, D. A. (2013). Theory is dead, long live theory: The end of the great debates and the rise of eclecticism in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 567–587.
Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
McIntosh, C. (2015). Theory across time: The privileging of time-less theory in international relations. International Theory, 7, 464–500. doi:10.1017/S1752971915000147.
Meissner, R. (1998a). Water as a Source of Political Conflict and Co-operation: A Comparative Analysis of the Situation in the Middle East and Southern Africa (Afrikaans). M.A. Dissertation, Department of Political Studies. Johannesburg, South Africa: Rand Afrikaans University (RAU).
Meissner, R. (1998b). Piping water from the Okavango River to Namibia—the role of communities and pressure groups in water politics. Global Dialogue, 3(2).
Meissner, R. (2003). Interaction and existing constraints in international river basins. In M. Nakayama (Ed.), International waters in Southern Africa. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
Meissner, R. (2004). The Transnational Role and Involvement of Interest Groups in Water Politics: A Comparative Analysis of Selected Southern African Case Studies. Pretoria: D.Phil. Dissertation in the Faculty of Humanities, University of Pretoria.
Meissner, R. (2005). Interest groups and the proposed Epupa Dam: Towards a theory of water politics. Politeia, 24(3): 354–370.
Meissner, R., Funke, N., Nienaber, S., & Ntombela, C. (2013). The status quo of research on South Africa’s water resource management institutions. Water SA, 39(5), 721–732.
Meissner, R. (2014a). Paradigms and theories in water governance: The case of South Africa’s National Water Resource strategy (2nd ed.). Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria. Publication Number: CSIR/NRE/WR/IR/2014/0076/A.
Meissner, R. (2014b). Paradigms and theories influencing a selected section of global water governance: The case of the UNDP’s Water and Ocean Governance focus area. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Pretoria. Publication Number: CSIR/NRE/WR/IR/2014/0077/A.
Meissner, R. (2014c). Who wants to be an agent? A framework to analyse water politics and governance. Water SA, 40(1), 1–10.
Meissner, R. (2015a, September). The relevance of social theory in the practice of environmental management. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-015-9700-y.
Meissner, R. (2015b). The governance of urban wastewater treatment infrastructure in the Greater Sekhukhune District Municipality and the application of analytic eclecticism. International Journal of Water Governance, 3(2), 79–110. doi:10.7564/14-IJWG55.
Meissner, R. (2015c). Interest groups, water politics and governance: The case of the Lesotho highlands water project. Heidelberg: Springer.
Meissner, R., & Ramasar, V. (2015). Governance and politics in the upper Limpopo River basin, South Africa. GeoJournal, 80(5), 689–709.
Meissner, R. (2016). Water security in Southern Africa: Discourses securitising water and the implications for water governance and politics. In C. Pahl-Wostl, A. Bhaburi, & J. Gupta (Eds.), Handbook on water security. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Meissner, R., & Jacobs, I. (2016). Theorising complex water governance in Africa: the case of the Proposed Epupa Dam on the Kunene River. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 14(2), 21–48.
Neme, L. A. (1997). The power of a few: Bureaucratic decision-making in the Okavango Delta. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 35(1), 37–51.
Neumann, R. P. (2009). Political ecology: theorizing scale. Progress in Human Geography, 33(3), 398–406.
Norma, E. S., Bakker, K., & Cook, C. (2012). Introduction to the themed section: Water governance and the politics of scale. Water Alternatives, 5(1), 52–61.
Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary (OALD). (2013). 8 th Edition. Oxford: Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary.
Reisner, M. (1993). Cadillac desert: The American West and its disappearing water (Revised ed.). New York: Penguin.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies XLIV, 652–667.
Turton, A. R. (1999). Water scarcity and social adaptive capacity: Towards an understanding of the social dynamics of water demand management in developing countries, MEWREW Occasional Paper No. 9, London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
Turton, A. R., Meissner, R., Mampane, P. M., & Seremo, O. P. (2004). A hydropolitical history of South Africa’s international River Basins. Pretoria: Water Research Commission. WRC Report No. 1220/1/04.
Warner, J. F., Wester, P., & Hoogesteger, J. (2014). Struggling with scales: Revisiting the boundaries of river basin management. WIREs Water, 1, 469–481.
Weber, R. (2004). The rhetoric of positivism versus interpretivism: A personal view. MIS Quarterly, 28(1): iii–xii.
Yasuda, Y. (2014). Formal rules, informal norms and advocacy strategies of NGOs: Lessons from the Mekong River. Dundee: Centre for Water Law, Policy and Science.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meissner, R. (2016). Interest Groups, Scalar Politics and Temporality. In: Hydropolitics, Interest Groups and Governance. SpringerBriefs in Environmental Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38887-8_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38887-8_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38886-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38887-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)