Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Formative Assessment of Creativity in Undergraduate Mathematics: Using a Creativity-in-Progress Rubric (CPR) on Proving

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creativity and Giftedness

Part of the book series: Advances in Mathematics Education ((AME))

Abstract

Creativity is one of the most important aspects of mathematicians’ work (Sriraman 2004), whether it is an enlightenment that is somewhat unexpected or a product that is aesthetically pleasing (Borwein, Liljedahl & Zhai 2014). There are studies in the primary and secondary levels on mathematical creativity of students (e.g., Leikin 2009; Silver 1997), and recent efforts have included mathematical creativity in K-12 education standards (e.g., Askew 2013). However, there is little research in undergraduate mathematics education on creativity. The project described in this chapter introduces an assessment framework for mathematical creativity in undergraduate mathematics teaching and learning. One outcome of this project is a formative assessment tool, the Creativity-in-Progress Rubric (CPR) on proving, that can be implemented in an introductory proof course. Using multiple methodological tools on a case study, we demonstrate how implementing the CPR on proving can help researchers and educators to observe and assess a student’s development of mathematical creativity in proving. We claim if mathematicians who regularly engage in proving value creativity, then there should be some explicit discussion of mathematical creativity in proving early in a young mathematician’s career. In this chapter, we also outline suggestions on how to introduce mathematical creativity in the undergraduate classroom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Alcock, L., & Weber, K. (2008). Referential and syntactic approaches to proving: Case studies from a transition-to-proof course. CBMS Issues in Mathematics Education, 16, 101–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askew, M. (2013). Issues in teaching for and assessment of creativity in mathematics and science. In D. Corrigan, R. Gunstone, & A. Jones (Eds.), Valuing assessment in science education: Pedagogy, curriculum, policy. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 173–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balka, D. S. (1974). Creative ability in mathematics. Arithmetic Teacher, 21(7), 633–638.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birky, G., Campbell, C. M., Raman, M., Sandefur, J., & Somers, K. (2011). One problem, nine student-produced proofs. The College Mathematics Journal, 42(5), 355–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borwein, P., Liljedahl, P., & Zhai, H. (2014). Mathematicians on creativity. Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (2005). The art of problem posing. Mahwah: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, E. B., & Starbird, M. (2012). The 5 elements of effective thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M., Oehrtman, M., & Engelke, N. (2010). The precalculus concept assessment: A tool for assessing students’ reasoning abilities and understandings. Cognition and Instruction, 28(2), 113–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, R., & Housman, D. (1997). Facilitating learning events through example generation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33(3), 283–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furinghetti, F., & Morselli, F. (2009). Every unsuccessful problem solver is unsuccessful in his or her own way: Affective and cognitive factors in proving. Educational Studies of Mathematics, 70, 71–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K., & Doorman, M. (1999). Content problems in realistic mathematics education: A calculus course as an example. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39, 111–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1975). Varieties of creative giftedness, their measurement and development. Gifted Child Quarterly, 19, 107–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadamard, J. (1945). The mathematician’s mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (1998). Students’ proof schemes: Results from exploratory studies. In A. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), CBMS issues in mathematics education (Research in collegiate mathematics education III, Vol. 7, pp. 234–283). Providence: American Mathematical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, E., & Milgram, R. (2010). Creative thinking ability: Domain generality and specificity. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 272–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iannone, P., Inglis, M., Mejía-Ramos, J. P., Simpson, A., & Weber, K. (2011). Does generating examples aid proof production? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 77(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, L. R. (1973). The relationships among mathematical creativity, numerical aptitude and mathematical achievement. Unpublished Dissertation. Austin: University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakok, G., Savic, M., Tang, G., & El Turkey, H. (2015). Mathematicians’ views on undergraduate student creativity. In K. Krainer & N. Vondrova (Eds.), Congress of European research in mathematics education – 9 proceedings (pp. 1003–1009). Prague. Available online at, http://www.mathematik.uni-dortmund.de/ieem/erme_temp/CERME9.pdf.

  • Karakok, G., Savic, M., Tang, G., El Turkey, H., Plaxco, D., & Naccarato, E. (2016). A rubric for creativity in writing proofs. MAA Focus, 36(1), 42–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozbelt, A., Beghetto, R. A., & Runco, M. A. (2010). Theories of creativity. In The Cambridge handbook of creativity (pp. 20–47). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 129–145). Haifa: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leikin, R. (2014). Challenging mathematics with multiple solution tasks and mathematical investigations in geometry. In Y. Li, E. A. Silver, & S. Li (Eds.), Transforming mathematics instruction: Multiple approaches and practices (pp. 59–80). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lev-Zamir, H., & Leikin, R. (2011). Creative mathematics teaching in the eye of the beholder: Focusing on teachers’ conceptions. Research in Mathematics Education, 13, 17–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liljedahl, P. (2013). Illumination: An affective experience? ZDM, 45, 253–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liljedahl, P., & Sriraman, B. (2006). Musings on mathematical creativity. For the Learning of Mathematics, 26, 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, E. (2006). Creativity: The essence of mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 236–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelczer, I., & Rodriguez, F. G. (2011). Creativity assessment in school settings through problem posing tasks. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 8, 383–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plucker, J., & Zabelina, D. (2009). Creativity and interdisciplinarity: One creativity or many creativities? ZDM, 41, 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pólya, G. (1954). Mathematics and plausible reasoning. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman, M. (2003). Key Ideas: What are they and how can they help us understand how people view proof? Educational Studies in Mathematics, 52, 319–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, T. (2010). Assessing outcomes and improving achievement: Tips and tools for using rubrics. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. G. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 92–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savic, M. (2015). The incubation effect: How mathematicians recover from proving impasses. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 39, 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savic, M., Karakok, G., Tang, G., & El Turkey, H. (2015). Developing a creativity-in-progress rubric on proving. In T. Fukawa-Connelly (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th annual conference on research in undergraduate mathematics education (pp. 939–945). Pittsburgh: Mathematical Association of America. Available online at. http://sigmaa.maa.org/rume/RUME18-final.pdf

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1982). Measures of problem-solving performance and of problem-solving instruction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 13, 31–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selden, A., & Selden, J. (2003). Validations of proofs considered as texts: Can undergraduates tell whether an argument proves a theorem? Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 4–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selden, J., & Selden, A. (1995). Unpacking the logic of mathematical statements. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 29, 123–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, E. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and posing. ZDM Mathematical Education, 3, 75–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. C. (2006). A sense-making approach to proof: Strategies of students in traditional and problem-based number theory courses. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 25, 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sriraman, B. (2004). The characteristics of mathematical creativity. The Mathematics Educator, 14, 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, G., El Turkey, H., Savic, M., & Karakok, G. (2015). Exploration of undergraduate students’ and mathematicians’ perspectives on creativity. In T. Fukawa-Connelly (Ed.), Proceedings of the 18th annual conference on research in undergraduate mathematics education (pp. 993–1000). Pittsburgh: Mathematical Association of America. Available online at. http://sigmaa.maa.org/rume/RUME18-final.pdf

  • Thom, J., & Pirie, S. (2002). Problems, perseverance, and mathematical residue. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance tests of creative thinking: Technical-norms manual. Princeton: Personnel Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1982). Imagination and its development in childhood. In V. V. Davydov (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (General problems of psychology, Vol. 2, pp. 438–454). Moscow: Pedagogika (In Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1984). Imagination and creativity in adolescent. In D. B. Elkonin (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky (Child psychology, Vol. 4, pp. 199–219). Moscow: Pedagogika.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, K. (2001). Student difficulty in constructing proofs: The need for strategic knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 48(1), 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiles, A. (1995). Modular elliptic curves and Fermat’s Last Theorem. Annals of Mathematics, 142(3), 443–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zazkis, R., & Holton, D. (2009). Snapshots of creativity in undergraduate mathematics education. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in mathematics and the education of gifted students (pp. 345–365). Rotterdam: Sense.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA

    Milos Savic

  2. University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, CO, USA

    Gulden Karakok & Emilie Naccarato

  3. University of La Verne, La Verne, CA, USA

    Gail Tang

  4. University of New Haven, West Haven, CT, USA

    Houssein El Turkey

Authors
  1. Milos Savic
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gulden Karakok
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gail Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Houssein El Turkey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Emilie Naccarato
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Milos Savic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education RANGE Center, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel

    Roza Leikin

  2. Department of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, USA

    Bharath Sriraman

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Savic, M., Karakok, G., Tang, G., El Turkey, H., Naccarato, E. (2017). Formative Assessment of Creativity in Undergraduate Mathematics: Using a Creativity-in-Progress Rubric (CPR) on Proving. In: Leikin, R., Sriraman, B. (eds) Creativity and Giftedness. Advances in Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38840-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38840-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38838-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38840-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation