Skip to main content
  • 386 Accesses

Abstract

As postgraduate education expands internationally, the demand and pressures for successful outcomes have also increased. A key aspect under scrutiny in this is the timeous completion of a quality dissertation or thesis. This chapter explores the postgraduate research supervision perspectives and practices of one exceptional mathematics education researcher, Jill Adler, as a contribution to the conversation and understanding of mathematics education research supervision. The question is what can be learnt about supervision from her reflections and experiences, which have taken place in a post-Apartheid South Africa? The chapter draws on data from a larger South African Project on Postgraduate Education Research (1995-2004) and an interview with Jill Adler. The analysis yielded three paired themes, which explain her successful supervision of research students: creating community and being in community; becoming expert and being connected; and building projects and problems of practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    www. nrf.ac.za/rating

  2. 2.

    Goba, B. (PhD in progress). A critical analysis of knowledge produced through postgraduate mathematics education research in South Africa (1995–2004). University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

References

  • Academy of Science of South Africa (ASSAf). (2010). The PhD study: An evidence-based study on how to meet the demands for higher-level skills in an emerging economy. Consensus Report. Pretoria: ASSAf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adkins, B. (2009). PhD pedagogy and the changing knowledge landscapes of universities. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(2), 165–177. doi:10.1080/07294360902725041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler, J. (2001). Teaching mathematics in multilingual classrooms. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balfour, R. J., Moletsane, R., & Karlson, J. (2011). Speaking truth to power: Understanding educational research and the educational turn in South Africa’s new century. South African Journal of Higher Education, 25(2), 195–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, P. C. (1999). The supervision of doctoral dissertation using a collaborative cohort model. Counsellor Education and Supervision, 39(1), 46–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council on Higher Education (CHE). (2009). The CHE Higher Education Monitor: Postgraduate studies in South Africa: A statistical profile. Pretoria: CHE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fataar, A. (Ed.). (2012). Debating thesis supervision: Perspectives from a university education department. Stellenbosch: Sun Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Govender, K., & Dhunpath, R. (2011). Student experiences of the PhD cohort model: Working within or outside communities of practice. Perspectives in Education, 29(3), 88–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grevholm, B., Persson, L., & Wall, P. (2005). A dynamic model for education of doctoral students and guidance of supervisors in research groups. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 173–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemer, S. R. (2012). Informality, power and relationships in postgraduate supervision: Supervising PhD candidates over coffee. Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6), 827–839. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.674011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herzig, A. (2002). Where have all the students gone? Participation of doctoral students in authentic mathematical activity as a necessary condition for persistence toward the PhD. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 50, 177–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, L., Lee, A., & Green, B. (2000). The PhD and the Autonomous Self: Gender, rationality and postgraduate pedagogy. Studies in Higher Education, 25(2), 135–147. doi:10.1080/713696141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kehm, B. M. (2006). Doctoral education in Europe and North America. A comparative analysis. In U. Teichler (Ed.), The formative years of scholars (Wenner-Gren international series, Vol. 83). London: Portland Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krauss, S. E., & Ismail, I. A. (2010). PhD students’ experiences of thesis supervision in Malaysia: Managing relationships in the midst of institutional change. The Qualitative Report, 15(4), 802–822. Retrieved October 20, 2010, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR15-4/krauss.pdf

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leder, G. C., Forgasz, H. J., & Landvogt, J. (1998). Higher degree supervision: Why it worked. In J. A. Mallone, B. Atweh, & J. R. Northfield (Eds.), Research and supervision in mathematics and science education (pp. 129–149). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A. (2010). New approaches to doctoral supervision: Implications for educational development. Educational Developments, 11(2), 18–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberman, J. M., & Dorsch, N. G. (2005). The “Big Paper Network”—Supporting doctoral students to degree completion. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 2(8), 69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madikizela-Madiya, N., Goba, B., & Nkambule, T. (2013). Developing a researcher identity: A reflective narration of postgraduate students’ supervision experiences in a research project. South African Journal of Higher Education, 27(4), 941–952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallone, J. A., Atweh, B., & Northfield, J. R. (Eds.). (1998). Research and supervision in mathematics and science education. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manathunga, C. (2007). Supervision as mentoring: The role of power and boundary crossing. Studies in Continuing Education, 29(2), 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCallin, A., & Nayar, S. (2012). Postgraduate research supervision: A critical review of current practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 63–74. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2011.590979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, M., & Thornley, G. (2001). Experiences of doctoral students in mathematics in New Zealand. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(2), 113–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerad, M., & Heggelund, M. (Eds.). (2008). Towards a global PhD? Forces and forms in doctoral education worldwide. Washington: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nulty, D., Kiley, M., & Meyers, N. (2009). Promoting and recognising excellence in the supervision of research students: An evidence-based framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(6), 693–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, K., & Clark, C. M. (2009). A signature pedagogy in doctoral education: The leader-scholar community. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 216–221. doi:10.3102/0013189X09334207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, R. (2009). A learning community approach to doctoral education in the social sciences. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(1), 43–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. C., & Money, A. H. (2002). Alternative models for doctoral mentor organisations and research supervision. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 10(2), 127–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuel, M., & Vithal, R. (2011). Emergent frameworks of research teaching and learning in a cohort-based doctoral programme. Perspectives in Education, 29(3), 76–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stracke, E. (2010). Undertaking the journey together: Peer learning for a successful and enjoyable PhD experience. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 7(1), Article 8. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol7/iss1/8

  • Taylor, P. C., & Dawson, V. (1998). Critical reflections on a problematic student-supervisor relationship. In J. A. Mallone, B. Atweh, & J. R. Northfield (Eds.), Research and supervision in mathematics and science education (pp. 105–127). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vithal, R. (2010). Democratising mathematics educational doctoral research teaching and learning: Undoing the North-South divide. In H. Alrø, O. Ravn, & P. Valero (Eds.), Critical mathematics education: Past, present and future. Festschrift for Ole Skovsmose (pp. 197–207). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeegers, M., & Barron, D. (2012). Pedagogical concerns in doctoral supervision: A challenge for pedagogy. Quality Assurance in Education, 20(1), 20–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Renuka Vithal .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vithal, R., Goba, B. (2016). Successful Postgraduate Mathematics Education Supervision. In: Phakeng, M., Lerman, S. (eds) Mathematics Education in a Context of Inequity, Poverty and Language Diversity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38824-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38824-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38823-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38824-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics