Abstract
This chapter explores why it is that women’s organizations seek to engage rights-based approaches in contexts where activists are conscious of the limitations of human rights activism for delivering meaningful outcomes for women. I explores this puzzle through the example of the Malaysian women’s advocacy group EMPOWER who produced the 2011 Malaysian Women’s Rights Report Equality Under Construction (EMPOWER 2012). EMPOWER (or Persatuan Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor) is a feminist activist non-governmental organization (NGO) engaged in a range of programmes and advocacy activities focusing on issues broadly related to women’s empowerment—including activities such as working to build women’s political participation and supporting poor women working in the informal sector. The economic and political focus of EMPOWER’s grassroots work is reproduced in its advocacy strategy (often undertaken in collaboration with other women’s NGOs) that have focused on issues such as developing a women’s political agenda and, as is discussed in this chapter, developing campaigns and initiatives around women’s human rights and democratic governance in Malaysia more generally (http://empowermalaysia.org/ n.d.).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abdullah, M. C. b. (2012). Women’s rights to employment: The forgotten and invisible women workers, in Persatuan Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor (EMPOWER). Equality under construction: Malaysian women’s human rights report 2010/11 (pp. 45–110). Selangor: Persatuan Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor (EMPOWER).
Aw, N. (2011, October 31). Gender talks wont encroach on Islamic Law. Malaysiakini. Available at http://www.suhakam.org.my/c/document_library/get_file?p_l_id=24205&folderId=726638&name=DLFE-13704.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct 2012.
Basok, T., Ilcan, S., & Noonan, J. (2006). Citizenship, human rights and social justice. Citizenship Studies, 10(3), 267–273.
Blackwood, E., & Johnson, M. (2012). Queer Asian subjects: Transgressive sexuality and heteronormative meaning. Asian Studies Review, 36(4), 441–451.
CEDAW. (2006). Concluding comments of the committee on the elimination of discrimination against women: Malaysia. Combined initial and second periodic report. Committee on the elimination of discrimination against women thirty-fifth session 15 May–2 June 2006. Available at http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/cedaw/cedaw25years/content/english/CONCLUDING_COMMENTS/Malaysia/Malaysia-CO-1-2.pdf. Accessed 17 Oct 12.
Cornwall, A., & Molyneux, M. (2006). The politics of rights—dilemmas for feminist praxis: Introduction. Third World Quarterly, 27(7), 1175–1191.
Duggan, L. (2002). The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In R. Castronovo & D. D. Nelson (Eds.), Materializing democracy: Toward a revitalized cultural politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
Elias, J. (2008). Struggles over the rights of foreign domestic workers in Malaysia: The possibilities and limitations of ‘rights talk’. Economy and Society, 37(2), 282–303.
Elias, J. (2009). Gendering liberalisation and labour reform in Malaysia: Fostering “competitiveness” in the productive and reproductive economies. Third World Quarterly, 30(3), 469–483.
Epp, C. A. (1998). The rights revolution: Lawyers, activists and supreme courts in comparative perspective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Franck, A. C., & Olsson, J. (2014). Missing women? The under-recording and under-reporting of women’s work in Malaysia. International Labour Review, 153(2), 209–222.
Foley, R. (2004). Muslim women’s challenges to Islamic law: The case of Malaysia. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 6(1), 53–84.
Goh, J. N. (2012). Mak Nyah bodies as sacred sites: Uncovering the queer body-sacramentality of Malaysian male-to-female transexuals. CrossCurrents, 62(4), 512–521.
Grugel, J., & Uhlin, A. (2012). Renewing global governance: Demanding rights and justice in the global South. Third World Quarterly, 33(9), 1703–1718.
Kanagasabai, C. (2011). Malaysia: Limited and intermittent judicialization of politics. In B. Dressel (Ed.), The judicialization of politics in Asia (pp. 202–218). London: Routledge.
Kuga Thas, A. M. (2012). CEDAW in defending the human rights of lesbians, bisexual women and transgenders in Malaysia. In Persatuan Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor (EMPOWER), Equality under construction: Malaysian women’s human rights report 2010/11 (pp. 252–314). Selangor: Persatuan Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor (EMPOWER).
Liebowitz, D. J., & Zwingel, S. (2014). Gender equality oversimplified: Using CEDAW to counter the measurement obsession. International Studies Review, 16(3), 362–389.
Malaysian NGO CEDAW Alternative Report Group. (2012). CEDAW and Malaysia: Malaysian non-governmental organisations’ alternative report – Assessing the government’s progress in implementing the United Nations convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. Selangor: Women’s Aid Organisation.
Menon, L. (2012). A CEDAW approach to family law in advancing equality and non-discrimination. In Persatuan Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor (EMPOWER), Equality under construction: Malaysian women’s human rights report 2010/11 (pp. 112–173). Selangor: Persatuan Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor (EMPOWER).
Merry, S. E. (2006). Human rights and gender violence: Translating international law into local justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Merry, S. E. (2011). Measuring the world: Indicators, human rights, and global governance. Current Anthropology, 52(s3), 83–95.
Merry, S. E., Levitt, P., Rosen, M. Ş., & Yoon, D. H. (2010). Law from below: Women’s human rights and social movements in New York City. Law and Society Review, 44(1), 101–128.
Moustafa, T. (2013). Islamic law, women’s rights, and popular legal consciousness in Malaysia. Law and Social Inquiry, 38(1), 168–188.
Nathan, S. S. (2012). “Because I am a refugee”: The denial of human rights to refugee women and girls in Malaysia. In Persatuan Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor (EMPOWER). Equality Under Construction: Malaysian Women’s Human Rights Report 2010/11 (pp. 175–250). Selangor: Persatuan Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor (EMPOWER).
New Straits Times. (2012). PM: Women have a special place here. Available at http://www.nst.com.my/nation/general/pm-women-have-special-place-here-1.151758. Accessed 17 Oct 12.
NGO Shadow Report Group. (2005). NGO shadow report on the initial and second periodic report of the government of Malaysia: Reviewing the government’s implementation of the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women (CEDAW). Available at http://www.iwraw-ap.org/resources/pdf/Malaysia_SR.pdf. Accessed 01 Nov 06.
Offord, B. (2013). Queer activist intersections in Southeast Asia: Human rights and cultural studies. Asian Studies Review, 37(3), 335–349.
Orford, A. (2001). Feminism imperialism and the mission of international law. Nordic Journal of International Law, 71(2), 275–296.
Patel, I. (2012). The role of testimony and testimonial analysis in human rights advocacy and research. State Crime Journal, 1(2), 235–265.
Peletz, M. (2006). Transgendering and gender pluralism in Southeast Asia since early Modern Times. Current Anthropology, 47(2), 309–340.
Persatuan Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor (EMPOWER). (2012). Equality under construction: Malaysian women’s human rights report 2010/11. Selangor: Persatuan Kesedaran Komuniti Selangor (EMPOWER).
Press Statement by the Mak Nyah Community of Malaysia. (2010). Stop the violence and persecution. Available at http://www.loyarburok.com/2010/12/03/stop-the-violence-and-persecution-press-statement-by-the-mak-nyah-community-of-malaysia/. Accessed 16 Oct 12.
Rajagopal, B. (2007). Pro-human rights but anti-poor? A critical evaluation of the Indian Supreme Court from a social movement perspective. Human Rights Review, 8(3), 157–186.
Redhead, R. (2007). Imag(in)ing women’s agency. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 9(2), 218–223.
Richardson, D. (2000). Claiming citizenship: Sexuality, citizenship and lesbian feminist theory. Sexualities, 3(2), 255–272.
Risse, T., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices. In T. Risse, S. C. Rupp, & K. Sikkink (Eds.), The power of human rights: International norms and domestic change (pp. 1–38). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schaffer, K., & Smith, S. (2004). Human rights and narrated lives: The ethics of recognition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schiengold, S. A. (2004). The politics of rights: Lawyers, public policy and political change (2nd ed.). Ann Arbour: The University of Michigan Press.
Stewart, A. (2011). Gender law and justice in a global market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tajuddin, A. (2012). Malaysia and the world economy (1924–2011): Capitalism, ethnic divisions, and ‘managed’ democracy. Plymouth: Lexington.
Wilson, B. M. (2009). Institutional reform and rights revolutions in Latin America: The cases of Costa Rica and Columbia. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 1(2), 59–85.
Zwingel, S. (2012). How do norms travel? Theorizing international women’s rights in transnational perspective. International Studies Quarterly, 56(1), 115–129.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Elias, J. (2017). Situating Women’s Rights in Everyday Life: The EMPOWER Women’s Human Rights Report. In: Grugel, J., Nem Singh, J., Fontana, L., Uhlin, A. (eds) Demanding Justice in The Global South. Development, Justice and Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38821-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38821-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38820-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38821-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)