Launch and Then Solid Progress

  • Andrew Watson
Part of the Palgrave Advances in Criminology and Criminal Justice in Asia book series (PACCJA)


The Prime Minister at the time, Mr Taro Aso, harboured no doubts, at least in public, about the wisdom of change. On the day of its launch, 21 May 2009, he called the new system a “pillar of judicial reform” and said that it would “add a new page in the history of our judiciary”. His prepared statement continued: “It is expected that court procedures will become faster and comprehensible through public participation and through the introduction of their viewpoints and sentiments. I hope people in Japan will understand the significance of the lay judge system”.


  1. Foote, D. (2014). Citizen Participation: Appraising the Saiban-in System. 756 Michigan State International Law Review, 22(3), 755–775.Google Scholar
  2. Katsuta, T. (2010). Japan’s rejection of the American criminal jury. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 58, 497–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Oda, H. (2009). Japanese law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Reichel P. and Suzuki, Y. (2015). Japan’s Lay Judge System : A Summary of Its Development, Evaluation, and Current Status. International Criminal Justice Review, 25(3), 247–262.Google Scholar
  5. Shinomiya, S. (2010). Defying experts predictions, identifying themselves as sovereign: Citizens’ responses to their service as lay judges in Japan. 43 Social Sciences in Japan 8. (Sept, 2010).Google Scholar
  6. Wilson, J. (2013). Prime time for Japan to take another step forward in lay participation: Exploring expansion to civil trials. Akron Law Review, 46(3) 10–12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Watson
    • 1
  1. 1.Sheffield Hallam UniversitySheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations