Skip to main content
  • 874 Accesses

Abstract

Clinical laboratories in Canada are essentially all publically funded, either directly or indirectly. This has created a strong interest among laboratories in mitigating unsustainable increases in laboratory test volumes. However at the same time, the public nature of funding in Canada has opened the door to political interference in health care planning and delivery. A number of utilization management strategies have been attempted in Canada, and there is now renewed interest in laboratory utilization since the formation of Choosing Wisely Canada. Considerable work remains, however, in acquiring and analyzing laboratory utilization data, detecting patterns of suboptimal ordering, and matching these to the most appropriate utilization management strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Emson HE. The growth of a laboratory. Can Med Assoc J. 1965;93:211–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Korvin CC, Pearce RH. Laboratory screening. A critical survey. Can Med Assoc J. 1971;105:1053–5.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Rang M. The Ulysses syndrome. Can Med Assoc J. 1972;106:122–3.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ndegwa S. Funding of laboratory testing in Canada [environmental scan, issue 19]. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bayne L. BC laboratory services review [Internet]. In: Victoria (BC): British Columbia. Ministry of Health Services; 2003 July [cited 2011 Feb 17]. Available from http://www.health.gov.bc.ca/library/publications/year/2003/lab_review.pdf

  6. Katz SJ, McMahon LF, Manning WG. Comparing the use of diagnostic tests in Canadian and US hospitals. Med Care. 1996;34:117–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McNeely MD. The use of ordering protocols and other maneuvers: the Canadian experience. Clin Lab Med. 2002;22:505–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lyon AW, Greenway DC, Hindmarsh JT. A strategy to promote rational clinical chemistry test utilization. Am J Clin Pathol. 1995;103:718–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. van Walraven C, Goel V, Austin P. Why are investigations not recommended by practice guidelines ordered at the periodic health examination? J Eval Clin Pract. 2000;6:215–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. van Walraven C, Naylor CD. Do we know what inappropriate laboratory utilization is? A systematic review of laboratory clinical audits. JAMA. 1998;280(6):550–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hindmarsh JT, Lyon AW. Strategies to promote rational clinical chemistry test utilization. Clin Biochem. 1996;29:291–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. van Walraven C, Goel V, Chan B. Effect of population-based interventions on laboratory utilization: a time-series analysis. JAMA. 1998;280:2028–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Laupland KB, Church DL, Gregson DB. Blood cultures in ambulatory outpatients. BMC Infect Dis. 2005;5:35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang SJ, McMahon LF, Manning WG. Comparing the use of diagnostic tests in Canadian and US hospitals. Med Care. 1996;34:117–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Naugler C. A perspective on laboratory utilization management from Canada. Clin Chim Acta. 2014;427:142–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang Y, Don-Wauchope AC, Grey VL, Mansour M, Brill H, Armstrong D. Improving serological test ordering patterns for the diagnosis of celiac disease through clinical laboratory audit of practice. Clin Biochem. 2012;45:455–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bunting PS, Van Walraven C. Effect of a controlled feedback intervention on laboratory test ordering by community physicians. Clin Chem. 2004;50:321–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu Z, Abdullah A, Baskin L, Lewis G, Kelter G, Naugler C. An intervention to reduce laboratory utilization of referred out tests. Lab Med. 2012;43:9–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Rockey MJ, Naugler C, SIdhu D. Laboratory test utilization trends: past and future. Can J Pathol. 2013;5:65–71.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Naugler C, Thomas R, Turin TC, Guo M, Vaska M. Yearly clinical laboratory test expenditures for different medical specialties in a Canadian city. Am J Clin Pathol. 2015;144:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. van Walraven C, Raymond M. Population-based study of repeat laboratory testing. Clin Chem. 2003;49:1997–2005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Morgen E, Naugler C. Inappropriate repeats of six common laboratory tests in a Canadian City. Am J Clin Pathol 2015;144:704–712.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thommason A, Clement F, Kinniburgh DW, Lau CK, Guo M, Viczko J Kelly Guggisberg K, Thomas RE, Turin TC, Wesenberg JC, Abdullah A, Hnydyk WS, Crain J, Zimmerman G, Naugler C. How do we engage family physicians in laboratory utilization management? Report from a working group meeting, 20 Feb 2015. Report available from the author.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Verbrugghe S. Initiatives to optimize the utilization of laboratory tests. Ottawa: Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2014 (Environmental Scan; issue 44).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mohammed EA, Far BH, Naugler C. Applications of the MapReduce programming framework to clinical big data analysis: current landscape and future trends. BioData Min. 2014;7:22.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hauser RG, Shirts BH. Do we now know what inappropriate laboratory utilization is? An expanded systematic review of laboratory clinical audits. Am J Clin Pathol. 2014;141:774–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wennberg JE. Understanding geographic variations in health care delivery. N Engl J Med. 1999;40:52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wells RD, Dahl B, Nilson B. Comparison of the levels of quality of inpatient care delivered by pediatrics residents and by private, community pediatricians at one hospital. Acad Med. 1998;73:192–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Welch WP, Miller ME, Welch HG, et al. Geographic variation in expenditures for physicians’ services in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1993;328:621–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wahlström R, Hummers-Pradier E, et al. Variations in asthma treatment in five European countries—judgement analysis of case simulations. Fam Pract. 2002;19:452–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ashton CM, Petersen NJ, Souchek J, et al. Geographic variations in utilization rates in Veterans Affairs hospitals and clinics. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:32–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Meade MO, Jacka MJ, Cook DJ, et al. Survey of interventions for the prevention and treatment of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med. 2004;32:946–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Christakis DA, Cowan CA, Garrison MM, et al. Variation in inpatient diagnostic testing and management of bronchiolitis. Pediatrics. 2005;115:878–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Luft HS, Bunker JP, Enthoven AC. Should operations be regionalized? The empirical relation between surgical volume and mortality. N Engl J Med. 1979;301:1364–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Busby J, Schroeder K, Woltersdorf W, et al. Growth and geographic variation in the use of laboratory tests by NHS general practices: using routine data to identify research priorities. Br J Gen Pract. 2013;63:e256–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Mohammed AA, Naugler C, Far BH. Emerging business intelligence framework for a clinical laboratory through big data analytics. In: Tran QN, Arabnia H, editors. Emerging trends in computational biology, bioinformatics, and systems biology: algorithms and software tools. New York: Elsevier/MK; 2015. p. 577–602.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Naugler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Naugler, C. (2017). Laboratory Utilization Management in Canada. In: Lewandrowski, K., Sluss, P. (eds) Utilization Management in the Clinical Laboratory and Other Ancillary Services. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34199-6_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34199-6_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34197-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34199-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics