Social Psychological Micro-foundations for International Relations

Part of the Pioneers in Arts, Humanities, Science, Engineering, Practice book series (PAHSEP, volume 2)


Richard Ned Lebow’s first publications already give away what he is really after. In 1968, he published “Woodrow Wilson and the Balfour Declaration” in the Journal of Modern History. The article deals with the question of how Wilson came to declare his sympathy for the Zionist movement in October 1917.


International Relation Zionist Movement Crisis Management Human Motive Cultural Theory 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bernstein, Steven, Richard Ned Lebow, Janice Gross Stein, and Steven Weber, 2000. “God Gave Physics the Easy Problems: Adapting Social Science to an Unpredictable World”, European Journal of International Relations 6:1, 43–76.Google Scholar
  2. Flyvbjerg, Bent, 2001. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and How it Can Succeed Again (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  3. George, Alexander, 1983. Managing U.S.-Soviet Rivalry: Problems of Crisis Prevention (Boulder: Westview Press).Google Scholar
  4. Huth, Paul and Bruce Russett, 1990. “Testing Deterrence Theory: Rigor Makes a Difference”, World Politics 42:4, 466–501 (466).Google Scholar
  5. Hymans, Jacques, 2010. “The Arrival of Psychological Constructivism”, International Theory 2:3, 461–467.Google Scholar
  6. Jervis, Robert, Richard Ned Lebow, and Janice Gross Stein, 1985. Psychology and Deterrence (Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
  7. Kratochwil, Friedrich, 2003. “The Monologue of Science”, International Studies Review 5:1, 124–138 (128).Google Scholar
  8. Lebow, Richard Ned, 1968. “Woodrow Wilson and the Balfour Declaration”, Journal of Modern History 40, pp. 501–24.Google Scholar
  9. Lebow, Richard Ned, 1976. White Britain and Black Ireland: Social Stereotypes and Colonial Policy (Philadelphia: Institute for the Study of Human Issues).Google Scholar
  10. Lebow, Richard Ned, 1981. Between Peace and War: The Nature of International Crisis (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
  11. Lebow, Richard Ned, 1984. “Windows of Opportunity: Do States Jump Through Them?” International Security 9, pp. 147–86.Google Scholar
  12. Lebow, Richard Ned, 1989. “Deterrence: A Political and Psychological Critique,” in Robert Axelrod, Robert Jervis, Roy Radner, and Paul Stern, eds., Perspectives in Deterrence (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  13. Lebow, Richard Ned, 1991. “Extended Deterrence: Military Fact or Political Fiction,” in Eric Arnett, ed., New Technologies for Security and Arms Control: Threats and Promise (Washington, D.C.: American Association for the Advancement of Science), 55–76;Google Scholar
  14. Lebow, Richard Ned, 2005. “Deterrence: Then and Now,” Journal of Strategic Studies 28 (October), pp. 765–73.Google Scholar
  15. Lebow, Richard Ned, 2008. A Cultural Theory of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 2.Google Scholar
  16. Lebow, Richard Ned, 2010. Why Nations Fight (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  17. Lebow, Richard Ned, 2012. The Politics and Ethics of Identity: In Search of Ourselves (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  18. Lebow, Richard Ned, 2013. Archduke Franz Ferdinand Lives! A World Without World War I (Basingstoke: Palgrave).Google Scholar
  19. Lebow, Richard Ned and Janice Gross Stein, 1989. “Rational Deterrence Theory: I Think Therefore I Deter,” World Politics 41 (January), 208–24.Google Scholar
  20. Lebow, Richard Ned and Janice Gross Stein, 1990. “Deterrence: The Elusive Dependent Variable”, World Politics 42 (April), 336–69.Google Scholar
  21. Lebow, Richard Ned and Janice Gross Stein, 1994. We All Lost the Cold War (Princeton: Princeton University Press).Google Scholar
  22. Morgenthau, Hans, 1948. Politics among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace. (New York: Knopf).Google Scholar
  23. Morrow, James, 2010. “Eight Questions for A Cultural Theory of International Relations”, International Theory 2:3, 475–480 (478).Google Scholar
  24. Nicholas Onuf, 2009. “Motivation”, International Relations 23:1, pp. 143–148 (147–8).Google Scholar
  25. Onuf, 2010. “Motivation”; Nicholas Rengger, “Remember the Aeneid? Why International Theory Should Beware Greek Gifts”, International Theory 2:3, 454–460.Google Scholar
  26. Osiander, Andreas, 2009. “Culture, Change and the Meaning of History: Reflections on Richard Lebow’s New Theory of International Relations”, Millennium 37:4, pp. 137–152 (147).Google Scholar
  27. Patomäki, Heikki, 2009. “Back to the Renaissance?” International Relations 23, 155–159.Google Scholar
  28. Shilliam, Robbie, 2009. “A Fanonian Critique of Lebow’s A Cultural Theory of International Relations”, Millennium 38:1: 117–136.Google Scholar
  29. Singer, J. David, 1961. “The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International Relations”, World Politics 14(1): 77–92.Google Scholar
  30. Suganami, Hidemi, 2009. “Man, Culture and the Theory of International Relations”, International Relations 23, 149–154.Google Scholar
  31. Waltz, Kenneth N., 1979. Theory of International Politics (New York: McGraw-Hill).Google Scholar
  32. Wendt, Alexander, 1999. Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  33. Wohlforth, William, 2010. “A Matter of Honor”, International Theory 2:3, 468–474 (473).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Vienna School of International StudiesViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations