Skip to main content

An Elementary Fact About Unlinked Braid Closures

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 804 Accesses

Part of the book series: Association for Women in Mathematics Series ((AWMS,volume 6))

Abstract

Let \(n \in \mathbb {Z}^+\). We provide two short proofs of the following classical fact, one using Khovanov homology and one using Heegaard–Floer homology: if the closure of an n-strand braid \(\sigma \) is the n-component unlink, then \(\sigma \) is the trivial braid.

J. Elisenda Grigsby—Partially supported by NSF grant DMS-0905848 and NSF CAREER award DMS-1151671.

Stephan M. Wehrli—Partially supported by NSF grant DMS-1111680.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. J.A. Baldwin, J.E. Grigsby, Categorified invariants and the braid group. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 143(7), 2801–2814 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. J.S. Birman, H.M. Hilden, On isotopies of homeomorphisms of Riemann surfaces. Annl. Math. 2(97), 424–439 (1973)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. J.S. Birman, W.W. Menasco, Studying links via closed braids. V. The unlink. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 329(2), 585–606 (1992)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. T.D. Cochran, Non-trivial links and plats with trivial Gassner matrices. Math. Proc. Cambr. Philos. Soc. 119(1), 43–53 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. P. Ghiggini, P. Lisca, Open book decompositions versus prime factorizations of closed, oriented 3–manifolds. math.GT/1407.2148, (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. E. Giroux. Géométrie de contact: de la dimension trois vers les dimensions supérieures. In Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians, vol. 2 (Higher Education Press, Beijing, 2002), pp. 405–414

    Google Scholar 

  7. M. Hedden, Y. Ni, Khovanov module and the detection of unlinks. math.GT/1204.0960, (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Hedden, L. Watson, On the geography and botany of knot Floer homology. math.GT/1404.6913, (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. K. Honda, W.H. Kazez, G. Matić, Right-veering diffeomorphisms of compact surfaces with boundary. Inven. Math. 169(2), 427–449 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. K. Honda, W.H. Kazez, G. Matić, On the contact class in Heegaard Floer homology. J. Differ. Geom. 83(2), 289–311 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Johnson, Heegaard splittings and open books. math.GT/1110.2142, (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Khovanov, A categorification of the Jones polynomial. Duke Math. J. 101(3), 359–426 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Khovanov, Patterns in knot cohomology. I. Exp. Math. 12(3), 365–374 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Ni, Homological actions on sutured Floer homology. math.GT/1010.2808, (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. P. Ozsváth, Z. Szabó, Holomorphic disks and topological invariants for closed three-manifolds. Annl. Math. 159(3), 1027–1158 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. P. Ozsváth, Z. Szabó, Heegaard Floer homology and contact structures. Duke Math. J. 129(1), 39–61 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. O. Plamenevskaya, Transverse knots and Khovanov homology. Math. Res. Lett. 13(4), 571–586 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Ken Baker, John Baldwin, Rob Kirby, Tony Licata, and Danny Ruberman for interesting conversations and Joan Birman and Bill Menasco for a useful e-mail correspondence. We are especially grateful to Ian Biringer for telling us about Hopfian groups, to Matt Hedden for pointing out that Proposition 2 appears in [14], and to Tim Cochran for making us aware that historical references to Proposition 1 in the literature appear under the slogan, “Milnor’s invariants detect the trivial braid.” We would also like to thank the referee for making a number of useful suggestions that greatly improved the exposition.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Elisenda Grigsby .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Grigsby, J.E., Wehrli, S.M. (2016). An Elementary Fact About Unlinked Braid Closures. In: Letzter, G., et al. Advances in the Mathematical Sciences. Association for Women in Mathematics Series, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34139-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics