Skip to main content

Research Made Useful for Busy Rehabilitation Providers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Practical Psychology in Medical Rehabilitation

Abstract

“Evidence-based practice” (EBP) has become the standard in rehabilitation medicine and psychology in recent decades. EBP is an approach to health care in which clinical decisions are based on (1) the best available research evidence, (2) clinical judgment and expertise, and (3) the values and preferences of the patient. A large literature base supports the idea that the best quality patient care happens when scientific evidence is part of the decision-making process, leading psychology and other health-care professions to support the EBP framework as the standard of care and professional competency. However, despite the wide acceptance of EBP, health-care practitioners and programs often do not follow best available practices. In part, the use of EBP in routine practice is hampered by a perception among some clinicians that the research literature is inaccessible to clinicians, too time consuming to approach, and difficult to understand. In this chapter, we provide readers resources and encouragement for how to effectively find and employ research evidence to inform their use of EBP in the context of rehabilitation medicine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Evidence and practice. [cited 2014 April 26, 2014]. www.acrm.org/resources/evidence-and-practice.

  2. APA Presidential Task Force. Evidence-based practice in psychology. Am Psychol. 2006;61(4):271–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sackett DL et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t—It’s about integrating individual clinical expertise and the best external evidence. Br Med J. 1996;312(7023):71–2.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dijkers MP, Murphy SL, Krellman J. Evidence-based practice for rehabilitation professionals: concepts and controversies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(8):S164–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Groah SL et al. Beyond the evidence-based practice paradigm to achieve best practice in rehabilitation medicine: a clinical review. PM&R. 2009;1(10):941–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rose S, Bisson J, Wessely S. A systematic review of single-session psychological interventions (‘debriefing’) following trauma. Psychother Psychosom. 2003;72(4):176–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tuckey MR. Issues in the debriefing debate for the emergency services: moving research outcomes forward. Clin Psychol-Sci Pract. 2007;14(2):106–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Konigsberg RD. New ways to think about grief. 2011 [cited 2014 April 20, 2014]. http://content.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,2042372-1,00.html.

  10. Spring B. Evidence-based practice in clinical psychology: what it is, why it matters; what you need to know. J Clin Psychol. 2007;63(7):611–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. LaFerney MC. Using evidence to thwart burnout. ADVANCE for Nurses. 2006;8(2):31.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Aarons GA et al. Evidence-based practice implementation and staff emotional exhaustion in children’s services. Behav Res Ther. 2009;47(11):954–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Craig CD, Sprang G. Compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue, and burnout in a national sample of trauma treatment therapists. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2010;23(3):319–39.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Falzon L, Davidson KW, Bruns D. Evidence searching for evidence-based psychology practice. Prof Psychol-Res Pract. 2010;41(6):550–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bohannon J. Who’s afraid of peer review? Science. 2013;342(6154):60–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Shekelle PG et al. Validity of the agency for healthcare research and quality clinical practice guidelines—how quickly do guidelines become outdated? J Am Med Assoc. 2001;286(12):1461–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Butler D. The dark side of publishing. Nature. 2013;495(7442):433–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott D. McDonald Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McDonald, S.D., Perrin, P.B., Chopin, S.M., Pickett, T.C. (2017). Research Made Useful for Busy Rehabilitation Providers. In: Budd, M., Hough, S., Wegener, S., Stiers, W. (eds) Practical Psychology in Medical Rehabilitation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34034-0_59

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34034-0_59

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34032-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34034-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics