Skip to main content

The Rationale of Strategy Development for Future Viability: Creating Resources

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Future Viability, Business Models, and Values

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

  • 1132 Accesses

Abstract

Let us recapitulate what we have learned: If we want to convince companies to be sustainable, we need something other than simple appeals to their good will clothed in the ideals of CSR or the triple bottom line. Economic arguments for ethically sustainable enterprise also fall short of our goal. We have explained why: They are caught in a double category mistake. First, they mix up the systemic impulses that govern how people and enterprises act. Second, the appeals miss the relevant level where entrepreneurial action would be triggered. What we now need for our arguments is a closer look at these category mistakes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Commercial arguments in favor of ethical management come from the belief that sustainably responsible practices will reduce the transaction costs and produce greater profits, eg by avoiding the later costs of breaking with social or environmental standards or by improving the product brand or employer brand (cf. Gray and Balmer 1998; Hutton et al. 2001).

  2. 2.

    One dramatic example is the abduction of Jakob von Metzler. To find out where the kidnapped boy was kept, the deputy police commissioner of Frankfurt, Wolfgang Daschner, threatened the kidnapper Magnus Gäfgen with torture in the hope of rescuing the child alive. With the life of Jakob von Metzler at stake, Wolfgang Daschner decided against his oath to uphold the law. As an expression of the dilemma of conscience and his own responsibility for his decision, he noted in the official files that his decision was questionable. By this, he laid the grounds for his own prosecution over the matter.

  3. 3.

    We can name the normative principles proposed by Otto et al. (2007) for ethically constrained competition: “Competition should not intend or pursue the destruction of the competitor… should not be violent, but peaceful… should not be aggressive, but – if possible – based on inner calm … should not be degrading… should not be hidden, but transparent “(l.c. 43; italics by the author). This intensive emphasize on what should be done shows that companies actually tend to do the opposite, a frequent cause for scandal for the followers of ethical management.

  4. 4.

    This is where the arguments of value (Hemel 2007, 2013; Leisinger 2014), responsibility (Ulrich 1986, 1997), and governance-oriented company ethics (Wieland 2001, 2002) and the virtue ethical concepts of humane management (Dierksmeier 2011, 2012, 2013; von Kimakowitz et al. 2010; Dierksmeier et al. 2011) coincide. Even economic ethics that remain committed to the idea of the homo oeconomicus believe in trust and the people perspective as the basis for commercial practice (cf. Suchanek 2001, 186ff, 2012).

  5. 5.

    In Germany, one can name Claus Hipp, Karl-Ludwig Schweisfurth, or Götz Werner; on the international stage, we would include Ray Anderson, the founder of Interface, Douglas Tompkins, founder of The North Face and Esprit, or Jeremy Moon, the founder of Icebreaker.

  6. 6.

    “Millennials overwhelmingly believe that business needs a reset in terms of paying as much attention to people and purpose as it does products and profit. Seventy-five percent of Millennials believe businesses are too fixated on their own agendas and not focused enough on helping to improve society “(Deloitte Millenium Survey 2015, Executive Review, 1). On its German web pages on the study, Deloitte explains: “Social involvement is becoming important: A majority of people (Germany 62 % /Worldwide 75 %) is criticizing the profit thinking of companies. Their social relevance is given considerable attention—43 % of German respondents think that companies have more impact on social issues than the government. The behavior of companies is considered an ethical statement by a majority of respondents (Germany 39 %/Worldwide 53 %); they demand that executives help improve the state of society.” (http://www2.deloitte.com/de/de/pages/innovation/contents/millennial-survey-2015.html; translation from the German).

  7. 7.

    As Shoshana Zuboff argues in her article “The Secrets of Surveillance Capitalism” (Zuboff 2016) the internet and content driven business models of Google, Facebook and Co are based on the gathering of information about how individuals move and behave. “In its thirst for knowledge of and influence over the most detailed nuances of our behavior” they venture on “the significance of behavioral surplus”. Veiled with the argument that the knowledge about individual attitudes and behaviors would serve as basis for delivering individually customized and optimized products and services these data are not used in favor of the customer but rather in favor of those who want to use these data to influence the customer. As Facebook did show with an experiment in 2013 every user individual and all users as a dynamic group can be influenced and manipulated easily by changing the algorithm of the newsfeeds. By doing this on large scale not only markets could be manipulated but even the outcome of political elections as the recent discussion of Facebook on how to deal with Donald Trump in the presidential election campaign does unveil (Lobe 2016).

  8. 8.

    Friedrich Glasl calls this last step of escalation “Together into the abyss” (Glasl 1980, 302).

  9. 9.

    Considering Glasl’s model with the global ethos values in mind and comparing them to international conflict research, we see that all conflict resolution models put forward, such as the Harvard Negotiation Model of Fischer and Ury (1981), Ury (1991), and Fisher and Shapiro (2005) or the Human Dignity Modell of Donna Hicks (2011), also rely on that canon of global ethos values.

  10. 10.

    To help us distinguish between the terms leading, leadership, leadership styles, and leadership systems, the following definitions can be useful (Glauner 2016c):

    Leading means taking decisions in instances of incomplete knowledge. It is the process of structuring complex incidents by selecting the means, ways, and goals (factual focus) and organizing and motivating people (people focus) with the aim of getting the involved actors to solve the tasks and reach the goals on their own accord.

    Leadership means the ability to inspire people for a cause so that they are themselves motivated to pursue it. Good leadership pursues voluntary and active work on the assigned duties, not blind obedience. Leading means activating values that are shared on an interpersonal level. They follow the idea of people as sense-oriented beings.

    Leadership styles are concrete approaches used to activate the people being led. From the point of view of the leader, these are systemic practices that help employees find, coordinate, and introduce solutions for complex circumstances. Leadership styles form leadership systems.

    Leadership systems are systems of values that organize the actual interaction between leading and being led. Leadership systems are expressions of historical and socio-cultural concepts that define the view of man and the roles of the leader and the follower.

    Leadership responsibility means the comprehensive responsibility for the people who are being led (mistakes made by employees are mistakes of the leader).

  11. 11.

    Otto et al. (2007) can find in swarm intelligence, that is, in the unreflected decisions of the many, a potential that companies can use for their competitive purposes, eg in understanding their environments (l.c. 158), but also in forming their organizations or innovating. What makes sense for fish or birds – namely, the responsive reactions of a massive group of cognitively not overly developed individuals in a not overly complex environment (eg when a seal hunts a school of herrings)—does not make as much sense for cognitively highly developed individuals in highly complex environments. History suggests that the swarm behavior of humans does not normally lead to better solutions. Instead, the outcome is often sub-par, eg the typical boom-and-bust effect in swarmed markets. Organizational research and the study of democratically inclusive decision-making processes (Grande 2012) show us that self-constituent groups only manage to reach optimum decisions quickly or effectively in complex environments, when they only include a limited number of individuals and when these share the key values and worldviews. Specifically, this would include those ethos values that govern a smooth handling of differences and that have the potential to produce and accommodate different perspectives. As soon as the number of participants and/or the complexity of the problem to be managed and/or the differences in the values and worldviews of the group increase, swarm intelligence soon devolves into swarm stupidity. Every member of the swarm then just goes with the flow and follows only one idea, without even considering other options, and the system becomes incapable of managing itself quickly, efficiently, or effectively.

  12. 12.

    Jared Diamond (2005) and Colin Woodard (2004) have given impressive proof that such a collapse is indeed not unusual for humankind. Nico Paech argues, the only way to avoid such a collapse is to rise above the lures of excess (Paech 2012), which seems a noble ambition. A sober mind, however, knows that this goes against our nature as humans.

  13. 13.

    The spiral of price erosion can be seen in the hours that an average employee needs to work in order to be able to afford something. In 1960, everyday essentials cost 20 min of work (two pounds of bread), 39 min (half a pound of butter), 51 min (10 eggs), or 15 min (a bottle of beer), compared to the following work required in 1991 and 2007: for a 2-pound loaf of bread eleven/ten minutes, six/five minutes for the butter, eight/seven minutes for the eggs, and 3 min for the beer.

    The rate of erosion is even more impressive when looking at higher-price commodities, such as fridges, washing machines, or television sets. For a fridge, the average employee in 1960, 1991, and 2007 had to work 156.5 h, or 30 h and 27 min, or 24 h and 12 min. In the case of washing machines, this went down from 224.5 h (1960), to 53 h and 27 min (1991) and 35 h and 34 min (2007). For TVs, it was 351 h, 38 min (1960), 79 h and 4 min (1991) or 23 h and 2 min in 2007. (cf. http://www.handelsblatt.com/politik/konjunktur/nachrichten/butter-zucker-tageszeitung-tabelle-kaufkraft-der-lohnminute/2937670.html)

  14. 14.

    Even though no reliable figures have been published by the Federal Reserve Bank since the financial crisis of 2008, we can safely assume that the global markets are currently flooded with several times more liquid capital than would be required to finance the real global economy.

References

  • Anders, G. (1956). Die Antiquiertheit des Menschen. Vol. 1. Über die Seele im Zeitalter der zweiten industriellen Revolution. Munich: Beck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1951). Elemente und Ursprünge totalitärer Herrschaft. Munich: Piper (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1964). Eichmann in Jerusalem. Ein Bericht von der banalität des Bösen. Munich: Piper (9th ed., 2011).

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. E. (1955, November). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193, 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and submission to group pressures. Psychological Monographs, 70, 416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badura, B., Greiner, W., Rixgens, P., Ueberle, M., & Behr, M. (2013). Sozialkapital. Grundlagen von Gesundheit und Unternehmenserfolg (2nd revised ed.). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • BCG Boston Consulting Group. (2015). Global Wealth 2015: Winning the growth game. https://www.bcgperspectives.com/content/articles/financial-institutions-growth-global-wealth-2015-winning-the-growth-game/

  • Benyus, J. M. (1997). Biomimicry. Innovation inspired by nature. New York: William Morrow/Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostrom, N. (2005). A history of transhumanist thought. Journal of Evolution and Technology, 14, 1–25. http://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/224444.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1982). Die feinen Unterschiede. Kritik der gesellschaftlichen Urteilskraft. Frankfurt/M: Suhrkamp (4th ed., 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Braungart, M., & McDonough, W. (2002). Cradle to cradle: Remaking the way we make things. New York: North PointPress [Deutsch: Einfach intelligent produzieren. Cradle to cradle: Die Natur zeigt, wie wir die Dinge besser Machen können. Berlin: Berliner Taschenbuch Verlag (2003)].

    Google Scholar 

  • Braungart, M., & McDonough, W. (2013). The upcycle. Beyond sustainability—Designing for abundance. New York: Melcher/North Point Press [Deutsch: Intelligente Verschwendung. The Ubcycle: Auf dem Weg in eine neue Überflussgesellschaft. Munich: Oekom].

    Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. New York/London: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckingham, M., & Clifton, D. O. (2001). Now. Discover your strengths. New York: Free Press [Deutsche Fassung: Entdecken Sie Ihre Stärken jetzt. Das Gallup-Prinzip für individuelle Entwicklung und erfolgreiche Führung. Frankfurt am Main: Campus (3rd ed., 2007)].

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. New York: Anchor/Random House [Deutsch: Lebensnetz. Ein neues Verständnis der lebendigen Welt. Munich, Vienna: Schwerz, Bern].

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F., & Luisi, P. L. (2014). The systems view of life: A unifying vision (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dahrendorf, R. (1995). Economic opportunity, civil society, and political liberty. Geneva: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P., & Serageldin, I. (Eds.). (2000). Social capital. A multifaceted perspective. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte Millenial Survey. (2015). http://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/global/Documents/About-Deloitte/gx-wef-2015-millennial-survey-executivesummary.pdf

  • Diamond, J. (2005). Collapse. How societies choose to fail or succeed. New York: Viking, Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierksmeier, C. (2011). The freedom—Responsibility Nexus in management philosophy and business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 101(2), 263–283. doi:10.1007/s10551-010-0721-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierksmeier, C. (2012). Thomas Aquinas on justice as a global virtue in business. Business Ethics Quarterly, 22(2), 247–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierksmeier, C. (2013). Kant on virtue. Journal of Business Ethics (Springer-Online). doi: 10.1007/s10551-013-1683-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierksmeier, C., Amann, W., Kimakowitz, E. V., Spitzeck, H., & Pirson, M. (Eds.). (2011). Humanistic ethics in the age of globality. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs, R., Ramaswamy, S., Stephenson, E., & Viguerie, S. P. (2014, September). Management Intuition for the next 50 years. McKinsey Quarterly, 1. http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/strategy/management_intuition_for_the_next_50_years

  • Durkheim, E. (1912). Die elementaren Formen des religiösen Lebens. Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp (1981, 3rd ed., 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E., & Mauss, M. (1901/1902). Über einige primitive Formen von Klassifikation. Ein Beitrag zur Erforschung der kollektiven Vortstellungen. In: E. Durkheim (Ed.), Schriften zur Soziologie der Erkenntnis. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp (1987, pp. 167–256).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrando, F. (2013): Posthumanism, transhumanism, antihumanism, metahumanism, and new materialisms. Existenz, 8(2), 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., & Shapiro, D. (2005). Beyond reason. Using emotions as you negotiate. London: Penguin (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to Yes. Negotiating an agreement without giving in. London: Random House (15th ed., 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • FM‐2030. (1989). Are you a transhuman?: Monitoring and stimulating your personal rate of growth in a rapidly changing world. New York, NY: Warner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, V. K., & Fung, W. K., Wind, Y. (J.). (2008). Competing in a flat World. Building enterprises for a borderless world. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, S. F., Sapp, J., & Tauber, A. I. (2012). A symbiotic view of life: We have never been individuals. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 87, 325–341. doi:10.1086/668166).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glasl, F. (1980). Konfliktmanagement. Ein Handbuch für Führungskräfte, Beraterinnen und Berater (11th ed.). Bern: Haupt, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glauner, F. (1997). Sprache und Weltbezug (2nd ed.). Freiburg: Alber (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glauner, F. (2013). CSR und Wertecockpits. Mess- und Steuerungssysteme der Unternehmenskultur. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glauner, F. (2014). Ethics, values and corporate cultures. A Wittgensteinian approach in understanding corporate action. Paper delivered at the international CSR, sustainability, ethics and governance conference, London, UK (University of Surrey, Guildford) August 14–16 2014 to be published in the Proceedings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glauner, F. (2015b, 13). Zukunftsfähige Unternehmensplanung. In Brauwelt, 155. Jg. (S. 360–172 362). Nürnberg: Hans Carl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glauner, F. (2015c). Werteorientierte Unternehmensführung. In: Brauwelt, 21-22/2015, 155 (pp, 616–618). Nuremberg: Hans Carl.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glauner, F. (2016a). Werteorientierte Organisationsentwicklung. Sieben Thesen zu den ethischen und ökonomischen Grundlagen einer nachhaltigen Unternehmensorganisation. In B. Schram & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), CSR und Organisationsentwicklung. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glauner, F. (2016b). Strategien der Exzellenz. Wertestrategien zu den Wettbewerbsvorteilen von morgen. In T. Wunder (Ed.), CSR und Strategisches Management. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glauner, F. (2016c). Values cockpits. On measuring and steering corporate cultures. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer (translation of 2nd edition of Glauner 2013 to appear in 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Glauner, F. (2016b). CSR and values cockpits. Measuring and steering corporate cultures. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer (translation of 2nd edition of Glauner 2013 to appear in 2016).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gohl, C. (2011). Prozedurale Politik am Beispiel organisierter Dialoge. Münster, Hamburg, London: Lit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grande, E. (2012). Governance-Forschung in der Governance-Falle?—Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 53(4), 565–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, E. R., & Balmer, J. M. T. (1998). Managing corporate image and corporate reputation. Long Range Planning, 31(5), 695–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hachtel, W. (1998). Mykorrhiza vermittelt Stofftransfer zwischen Waldbäumen. Spektrum der Wissenschaft, 4, 25. http://www.spektrum.de/magazin/mykorrhiza-vermittelt-stofftransfer-zwischen-waldbaeumen/824505

  • Hemel, U. (2007). Wert und Werte. Ethik für Manager—Ein Leitfaden für die Praxis. Munich: Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemel, U. (2013). Die Wirtschaft ist für den Menschen da. Vom Sinn und der Seele des Kapitals. Ostfildern: Patmos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. (2011). Dignity. The essential role it plays in resolving conflict (2nd ed.). New Haven, London: Yale University Press (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. (2004). Citizen Cyborg: Why democratic societies must respond to the redesigned human of the future. Cambridge, MA: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hummel, K. (2015, May 20). Persönlichkeitsanalyse. Deine Sprache verrät dich. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. http://www.faz.net/aktuell/gesellschaft/menschen/software-erkennt-persoenlichkeit-mit-sprachanalyse-13596216.html

  • Hutton, J. G., Goodman, M. B., Alexander, J. B., & Genest, C. M. (2001). Reputation management: The new face of corporate public relations? Public Relations Review, 27(3), 247–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, J. (1957). Transhumanism. In ders (Ed.), New bottles for new wine (pp. 13–17). London: Chatto & Windus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1785). Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten? In W. Weischedel (Ed.), Werke in sechs Bänden (Vol. IV, pp. 7–102). Darmstadt, 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1799). Kritik der Urteilskraft. Hamburg: Meiner (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, T. (1994, Oktober). Salvo in Germany. Salvo Monthly, 23, 11–14. http://www.salvoweb.com/files/salvonews/sn99v3.pdf#page=11

  • Kegel, B. (2015). Die Herrscher der Welt. Wie Mikroben unser Leben bestimmen. Cologne: Dumont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon A. (2015) Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality (Working Paper 15-073). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kocic, A. (2015, June). Work crisis—A divided tale of labour markets. Deutsche Bank Konzept. Reflections on unusual issues, 46–53. https://www.dbresearch.de/PROD/DBR_INTERNET_DE-PROD/PROD0000000000357626/Konzept+Issue+05.pdf

  • Kohr, L. (1983). The Eve of 1984. In: S. Vötter-Dankl, & C. Vötter (Eds.), Right livelihood award (alternative Nobel Prize) acceptance speech on 9 December 1983 in Stockholm. Neukirchen am Großvenediger: Leopold Kohr-Akademie (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1995). Die Psychologie der Moralentwicklung. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Küng, H. (2012). Handbuch Weltethos. Eine Vision und ihre Umsetzung. Munich: Pieper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisinger, K. M. (2014). Global values for global development. Working Paper prepared to the conferences of the Sustainable Development Solutions Network (SDSN) and of th UN GlobL Compact LEAD Initiative in September 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobe, A. (2016, April 29). Wird Facebook Donald Trump verhindern? Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, S.17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (1970). Biologie der Kognition. In H. Maturana (Ed.), Erkennen: Die Organisation und Verkörperung von Wirklichkeit (pp. 32–80). Braunschweig: Viehweg (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (1976). Biologie der Sprache: die Epistemologie der Realität. In H. Maturana (Ed.), Erkennen: Die Organisation und Verkörperung von Wirklichkeit (pp. 236–271). Braunschweig: Viehweg (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H. R. (1978). Kognition. In S. J. Schmidt (Ed.), Der Diskurs des radikalen Konstruktivismus (pp. 89–118). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp (1987, 2nd ed., 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority. An experiment view. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mischel, W. (2015). The marshmallow test. Mastering self-control. New York: Little Brown (Deutsch: Der Marshmallow-Test. Willensstärke, Belohnungsaufschub und die Entwicklung der Persönlichkeit. Munich: Siedler).

    Google Scholar 

  • More, M. (2013). The philosophy of Transhumanism. In: M. More, & N. Vita-More (Eds.), The Transhumanist reader: Classical and contemporary essays on the more science, technology, and philosophy of the human future (pp. 3–17). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell. http://media.johnwiley.com.au/product_data/excerpt/10/11183343/1118334310-109.pdf

  • Neitzel, S., & Welzer, H. (2011). Protokolle vom Kämpfen, Töten und Sterben, Soldaten (4th ed.). Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2000). Social capital: A fad or a fundamental concept. In D. Partha & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital. A multifaceted perspective (pp. 172–214). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otto, K.-S., Nolting, U., & Bässler, C. (2007). Evolutionsmangagement. Von der Natur lernen: Unternehmen entwicklen und langfristig steuern. Munich: Hanser.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paech, N. (2012). Befreiung vom Überfluss: Auf dem Weg in die Postwachstumsökonomie. Munich: Oekon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauli, G. (1998). Upsizing: The road to zero emissions. Sheffield: Greenleaf (Deutsch: UpCycling. Wirtschaften nach dem Vorbild der Natur für mehr Arbeitsplätze und eine sauberer Umwelt. Berlin: Riemann, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauli, G. (2010). The blue economy: 10 Years, 100 Innovations, 100 Million Jobs. Taos: Paradigm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savulescu, J., & Bostrom, N. (Eds.). (2009). Human enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E. F. (1973). Small is beautiful. A study of economics as if people mattered. London: Blond & Briggs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (2007). Die Kultur des neuen Kapitalismus. Berlin: Berliner Taschenbuch Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoda, Y., Mischel, W., & Peake, P. K. (1990). Predicting adolescent cognitive and self-regulatory competencies from preschool delay of gratification: Identifying diagnostic conditions. Developmental Psychology, 26, 978–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon-Kucher. (2014). Global Pricing Study 2014. Bonn: Simon-Kucher & Partners, Strategy & Marketing Consultants.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchanek, A. (2001). Ökonomische Ethik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck UTB (2nd revised ed., 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchanek, A. (2012). Vertrauen als Grundlage nachhaltiger unternehmerischer Wertschöpfung. In: A. Schneider, & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility. Verantwortungsvolle Unternehmensführung in Theorie und Praxis (pp. 55–66). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, P. (1986). Transformation der ökonomischen Vernunft. Fortschrittsperspektiven der modernen Industriegesellschaft. Bern, Stuttgart: Haupt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, P. (1997). Integrative Wirtschaftsethik. Grundlagen einer lebensdienlichen Ökonomie. Bern, Stuttgart, Vienna: Haupt (4th ed., 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ury, W. (1991). Getting past No. Negotiating in difficult situations. New York, Toronto, London, Sidney, Auckland: Bantam Books/Random House (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Villhauer, B. (2015). Finanzmarktkriminalität und Ethik. Erscheint in: P. Zoche, S. Kaufmann, & H. Arnold (Ed.), Grenzenlose Sicherheit?—Gesellschaftliche Dimensionen der Sicherheitsforschung. Reihe: Zivile Sicherheit. Schriftenzum Fachdialog Sicherheitsforschung. Berlin: LIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinge, V. (1993). The coming technological singularity: How to survive in the post-human era. http://www-rohan.sdsu.edu/faculty/vinge/misc/singularity.html. Originally in Vision-21: Interdisciplinary Science and Engineering in the Era of Cyberspace, G. A. Landis, ed., NASA Publication CP-10129, pp. 11–22.

  • von Kimakowitz, E., Pirson, M., Spitzeck, H., Dierksmeier, C., & Amann, W. (Eds.). (2010). Humanistic management in practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Weizsäcker, E. U., Lovins, A. B., & Lovins, L. H. (1995). Faktor Vier. Doppelter Wohlstand—halbierter Verbrauch. Munich: Droemer Knaur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P. (1976). Wie wirklich ist die Wirklichkeit. Wahn—Täuschung—Verstehen. Munich: Piper (21st ed., 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, J. (2001). Eine Theorie der Governanceethik. Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Unternehmensethik, 2(1). www.zfwu.de/index.php?id=491

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieland, J. (2002). WerteManagement und Corporate Governance (KIeM—Working Paper Nr. 03/2002). Konstanz Institut für WerteManagement. http://opus.htwg-konstanz.de/files/12/Working_Paper_03_2002_Wertemanagement_und_Corporate_Governance.pdf

  • Williams, J. N. (2012). Humans and biodiversity: population and demographic trends in the hotspots. Population and Environment (2013), 34:510–523. doi: 10.1007/s11111-012-0175-3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1989). Werkausgabe Bd. 1. Tractatus logico-philosophicus. Philosophische Untersuchungen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp [English version: Philosophical Investigations (3rd ed., 19th printing) (G.E.M. Anscombe, Trans.). New York: Macmillan].

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodard, C. (2004). The Lobster coast. Rebels, rusticators, and the struggle for a forgotten Frontier. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff, S. (2016, March 5). The secrets of surveillance capitalism. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung. Download March 7, 2016, from http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/the-digital-debate/shoshana-zuboff-secrets-of-surveillance-capitalism-14103616.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Glauner, F. (2016). The Rationale of Strategy Development for Future Viability: Creating Resources. In: Future Viability, Business Models, and Values. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34030-2_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics