Abstract
This chapter is the first substantive chapter to address the rising South thesis. It does so by first examining the question of the political economy of globalisation and why—for all its difficulties—it is a useful concept for understanding changes in the international order in recent years. It then shows, however, that this does not lead to a “flat earth” globalisation (as neoliberals but also some transnational capitalism theorists suggest) because of the differential power of states, but also the differential power of capitals, which still retain some significant degree of nationality, even as they have “globalised.” This is demonstrated through looking in depth at corporate ownership structures, and it shows how US capital continues to play a leading role in global capitalism, and that the significance of the BRICs, though growing, is still relatively small. This discussion is then used to revisit the questions of modernisation and dependency.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Arthur, C. 2016. Xiaomi: It’s China’s Apple Though You’ve Probably Never Heard of It. The Guardian, January 16. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/jan/16/xiaomi-chinas-equivalent-to-apple. Accessed 16 Jan 2016.
Beausang, F. 2012. Globalization and the BRICs. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Burbach, R., and B. Robinson. 1999. The Fin de Siecle Debate: Globalization as Epochal Shift. Science and Society 63(1): 10–39.
Dicken, P. 2015. Global Shift. 7th ed. London: Sage.
Doogan, K. 2009. New Capitalism? Cambridge: Polity.
Feenstra, R. 1998. Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production in the Global Economy. Journal of Economic Perspectives 12(4): 31–50.
Financial Times. 2013. League Tables: Investment Banking Review. http://markets.ft.com/investmentBanking/tablesAndTrends.asp?ftauth=1426510006710. Accessed 16 Mar 2014.
Financial Times. 2014. The FT Global 500. http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/988051be-fdee-11e3-bd0e-00144feab7de.html#axzz3RLgneD1a. Accessed 16 Feb 2015.
Friedman, T. 2005. The World Is Flat. New York: Allen Lane.
Froud, J., S. Johal, A. Leaver, and K. Williams. 2012. Apple Business Model. CRESC Working Paper no. 111, Manchester, pp. 1–29.
Giddens, A. 2000. The Third Way and Its Critics. Cambridge: Polity.
Glyn, A., A. Hughes, A. Lipietz, and A. Singh. 1992. The Rise and Fall of the Golden Age. In The Golden Age of Capitalism, eds. S. Marglin and J. Schor, 39–125. Oxford: Clarendon.
Gourinchas, P-O., and H. Rey. 2005. From World Banker to World Venture Capitalist: US External Adjustment and the Exorbitant Privilege. http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~pog/academic/exorbitant/exorb_privilege_0804.pdf. Accessed 1 June 2013.
Hardt, M., and T. Negri. 2004. Multitude. New York: Penguin.
Held, D., and T. McGrew. 2007. Globalization/Anti-Globalization. Cambridge: Polity.
Held, D., A. McGrew, D. Goldblatt, and J. Perraton. 1999. Global Transformations. Cambridge: Polity.
Hirst, P., S. Bromley and G. Thompson (2009) Globalization in Question (Cambridge: Polity).
Hoogvelt, A. 2001. Globalization and the Postcolonial World. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Hung, H.F. 2016. The China Boom: Why China Will Not Rule the World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Institutional Investor’s Alpha. 2013. Hedge Fund Ranking. http://www.institutionalinvestorsalpha.com/Research/4869/Hedge-Fund-100-Ranking.html. Accessed 16 Mar 2014.
Interbrand. 2014a. Interbrands 15th Annual Global Brands Report. http://interbrand.com/en/newsroom/15/interbrands-th-annual-best-global-brands-report. Accessed 10 Feb 2015.
Interbrand. 2014b. Rankings 2014. http://www.bestglobalbrands.com/2014/ranking/. Accessed 10 Feb 2015.
Joseph, J. 2008. On the Limits of Neo-Gramscian International Relations: A Scientific Realist Account of Hegemony. In Gramsci, Political Economy and International Relations Theory, ed. A. Ayers, 67–88. London: Palgrave.
Kiely, R. 2005. The Clash of Globalisations: Neo-Liberalism, the Third Way and ‘Anti-Globalisation’. Leiden: Brill.
Kiely, R. 2010. Rethinking Imperialism. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Linden, G., K. Kraemer, and J. Dedrick. 2007. Who Captures Value in a Global Innovation System? The Case of Apple’s Ipod. Personal Computing Industry Center, Irvine, pp. 1–10.
Nolan, P. 2012. Is China Buying the World? Cambridge: Polity.
Nolan, P. 2014. Globalisation and Industrial Policy: The Case of China. The World Economy 37(6): 747–763.
OECD. 2010a. Perspectives on Global Development, 2010, Shifting Wealth. Paris: OECD Development Centre.
OECD. 2010b. Perspectives of Global Development, 2010, Shifting Wealth: Summary. http://www.oecd.org/dev/pgd/45451514.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2013.
OECD. 2014. Gross Domestic Spending on R and D. http://data.oecd.org/rd/gross-domestic-spending-on-r-d.htm. Accessed 13 Feb 2015.
O’ Neill, J. 2013. The Growth Map. London: Portfolio Penguin.
Panitch, L., and S. Gindin. 2004. Finance and American Empire. In The Socialist Register 2005, eds. L. Panitch and S. Gindin, 46–81. London: Merlin.
Panitch, L., and S. Gindin. 2012. The Making of Global Capitalism. London: Verso.
PEI. 2014. The 2014 PEI 300. https://www.privateequityinternational.com/PEI/PEI_300_–_Top_50/. Accessed 16 Mar 2015.
Pilling, D. 2015. Corporate China Not Yet Ready to Rule the World. Financial Times, February 4.
Robinson, B. 2004. A Theory of Global Capitalism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Smith, J. 2012. The GDP Illusion. Monthly Review 64(3): 86–102.
Starrs, S. 2013. American Economic Power Hasn’t Declined—It Globalized! Summoning the Data and Taking Globalization Seriously. International Studies Quarterly 57(4): 817–830.
Starrs, S. 2014. The Chimera of Global Convergence. New Left Review 87(2): 81–96.
Steinfeld, E. 2010. Playing Our Game. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
The Register. 2015. Ericsson Drags Xiaomi Back to Court in India. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2015/02/09/ericsson_drags_xiaomi_back_to_court_in_india/. Accessed 10 Feb 2015.
UNCTAD. 2012. Trade and Development Report 2012. Geneva: UNCTAD.
UNCTAD. 2014. World Investment Report 2014. Geneva: UNCTAD.
World Bank. 2002. Globalization, Growth and Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
World Economic Forum. 2014. Global Competitiveness Report, 2014-2015. http://www.weforum.org/reports/global-competitiveness-report-2014-2015. Accessed 26 Mar 2015.
Xing, Y., and N. Detert. 2010. How the iPhone Widens the Trade Deficit with the PRC. ADBI Working Paper Series, no.257.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kiely, R. (2016). Questioning the Rise of the South I: Economic Globalisation and US Power. In: The Rise and Fall of Emerging Powers. Global Reordering. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34012-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34012-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34011-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34012-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)