Abstract
This chapter introduces the argument that the South has risen in recent years. It outlines two initial arguments: (1) that there has been a rise and this is a threat to the USA and the West; (2) that there has been a rise and this is because of market friendly policies as advocated by the West. It then relates these views to international relations (IR) theory—showing how realists and liberal internationalists respond to these questions—and shows that while these approaches are different, they are not objective, but in many respects “recommendations” for how the USA should respond to these changes. It then introduces approaches more critical of US hegemony (world systems theory [WST], global history and dependency theory), and in doing so shows how these are also perspectives on development. The chapter then moves on to explicitly consider the development question, showing how older modernisation theory overlaps, despite their considerable differences, with contemporary neoliberalism, in that both see contact with “the West” as desirable and progressive. And in particular I show how liberal internationalism and neoliberal political economy can be seen as new versions of modernisation theory. The chapter then focuses in more depth on dependency theory, arguing that, for all its problems, this approach does address important questions about inequality, marginalisation and subordination in the international order. The chapter then suggests that we might think of the rise (and fall) of the South in terms of modernisation and dependency approaches (rather than the specific details of these problematic theories), albeit updated to take account of new realities (including the uneven and unequal effects of China’s rise and premature industrialisation in much of the rest of the South). The final section provides an initial introduction to the rise and fall of the South through the lens of these two broad approaches.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alden, C., S. Morphet, and M. Vieira. 2012. The South in World Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Amsden, A. 1989. Asia’s Next Giant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Arrighi, G. 2007. Adam Smith in Beijing. London: Verso.
Ayers, A. 2013. Beyond Myths, Lies and Stereotypes: The Political Economy of a “New Scramble for Africa”. New Political Economy 18(2): 227–257.
Ban, C. (2013) ‘Brazil’s liberal neo-developmentalism’, Review of International Political Economy 20(2): 241–55.
Bernstein, H. 1979. Sociology of Development versus Sociology of Underdevelopment. In Development Theory: Four Critical Essays, ed. D. Lehmann, 77–106. London: Frank Cass.
Bin Wong, R. 1997. China Transformed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Bond, P., and A. Garcia (eds.). 2015. BRICS: An Anti-Capitalist Critique. London: Pluto.
Booth, D. 1985. Marxism and Development Sociology: Interpreting the Impasse. World Development 13(8): 761–787.
Bremmer, I. 2010. The End of the Free Market. New York: Portfolio.
Breslin, S. 2011. The “China Model” and the Global Crisis: From Friedrich List to a Chinese Mode of Governance? International Affairs 87(6): 1323–1343.
Brown, L. 2012. Full Planet, Empty Plates. New York: Norton.
BRICS (2013) ‘Fifth BRICS Summit’, available at http://www.brics5.co.za (Accessed June 6, 2015).
Campos, P.H. 2015. The Transnationalization of Brazilian Construction Companies. In BRICS: An Anti-Capitalist Critique, eds. P. Bond and A. Garcia, 148–161. London: Pluto.
Chandler, D. 2005. From Kosovo to Kabul. 2nd ed. London: Pluto.
Chang, H.-J. 2002. Kicking Away the Ladder. London: Anthem.
Chang, H.-J. 2007. Bad Samaritans. London: Random House.
Chase-Dunn, C. 2013. BRICS and the Potentially Progressive Semi-Periphery. Pambazuka News, March 19. http://www.pambazuka.org/en/category/features/86647/print. Accessed 5 Mar 2015.
Chin, G. 2012. China as a “Net Donor”: Trading Dollars and Sense. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 25(4): 579–603.
Chomsky, N. 2002. The Umbrella of US Power. New York: Seven Stories Press.
Cooper, R. 2003. The Breaking of Nations. New York: Atlantic.
Council on Foreign Relations. 2006. More than Humanitarianism: A Strategic US Approach to Africa. Independent Task Force Report No. 56. www.cfr.org/africa/more-thanhumanitarianism/p9302. Accessed 13 Apr 2014.
Cox, R. 1981. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium 10(2): 126–155.
Davies, W. 2014. The Limits of Neoliberalism. London: Sage.
Desai, R. 2012. The West Must Wake Up to the Growing Power of the BRICS. The Guardian, April 1.
Desai, R. 2013. The BRICS Are Building a Challenge to Western Economic Supremacy. The Guardian, April 2.
Deudney, D., and G.J. Ikenberry. 1999. The Nature and Sources of a Liberal International Order. Review of International Studies 25(2): 179–196.
Dirlik, A. 2006. Beijing Consensus, Beijing ‘Gongshi.’: Who Recognizes Whom and to What End? http://www.ids-uva.nl/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/9_Dirlik1.pdf. Accessed 6 Feb 2013.
Dollar, D., and A. Kraay. 2002. Growth Is Good for the Poor. Journal of Economic Growth 7: 195–225.
Dos Santos, T. 1970. The Structure of Dependence. American Economic Review 60(May): 231–236.
Escobar, P. 2013. Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa: BRICS Go over the Wall. Asia Times, March 27, 2013. http://www.atimes.com/atimes/World/WOR-01-260313.html. Accessed 26 Mar 2015.
Evans, P. 1995. Embedded Autonomy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Financial Times. 2011. The End of Hegemony. September 6.
Fine, B., and J. Saraswati (eds.). 2013. Beyond the Developmental State. London: Pluto.
Foot, R. 2006. Chinese Strategies in a US-Hegemonic Global Order: Accommodating and Hedging. International Affairs 82(1): 77–94.
Frank, A.G. 1969. Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Frank, A.G. 1998. Re-Orient. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gallagher, K., and R. Porzecanski. 2010. The Dragon in the Room. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Giddens, A. 2000. The Third Way and Its Critics. Cambridge: Polity.
Goldman Sachs. 2010. Is This the “BRICs Decade”. BRICs Monthly 10(3): 1–4.
Guan, E. 2010. Understanding Brazil’s Oil Industry: Policy Dynamics and Self-Sufficiency. Journal of Emerging Knowledge on Emerging Markets 2: 26–40.
Halper, S. 2010. The Beijing Consensus. New York: Basic.
Hameiri, S., and L. Jones. 2016. Rising Powers and State Transformation. European Journal of International Relations 18(1): 53–75.
Hung, H.F. 2016. The China Boom: Why China Will Not Rule the World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Huntington, S. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Ikenberry, G.J. 2008. The Rise of China and the Future of the West: Can the Liberal System Survive? Foreign Affairs 87(1): 23–37.
Jenkins, R. 2012. Latin America and China—A New Dependency? Third World Quarterly 33(9): 1337–1358.
Kagan, R. 2012. The World America Made. New York: Knopf.
Kaplinsky, R. and M. Morris (2008) ‘do the Asian drivers undermine export oriented development in Latin America?’, World Development 36(2): 254–73.
Kennedy, S. 2010. The Myth of the Beijing Consensus. Journal of Contemporary China 19(65): 461–477.
Keohane, R.O., and J.S. Nye. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. 4th ed. Boston: Longman.
Khanna, P. 2009. The Second World. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Kiely, R. 2007. The New Political Economy of Development. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Kiely, R. 2010. Rethinking Imperialism. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Kiely, R. 2015. The BRICs, US ‘Decline’ and Global Transformations. London: Palgrave.
Kirshner, J. 2010. The Tragedy of Offensive Realism: Classical Realism and the Rise of China. European Journal of International Relations 18(1): 53–75.
Kitching, G. 1982. Development and Underdevelopment in Historical Perspective. London: Methuen.
Knight, J. 2014. China as a Developmental State. The World Economy 37(10): 1335–1347.
Kohli, A. 2004. State Directed Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lal, D. 1984. The Poverty of ‘Development Economics’. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.
Lee, C.K. 2014. The Chimera of Global Convergence. New Left Review 87(2): 81–96.
Lundestad, G. 1998. ‘Empire’ by Integration: The United States and European Integration, 1945-1997. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mahbubani, K. 2008. The New Asian Hemisphere. New York: Public Affairs.
Mearsheimer, J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
Mearsheimer, J. 2006. China’s Unpeaceful Rise. Current History 105(April): 160–162.
Moravcsik, A. 1997. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization 51(4): 513–553.
Moravcsik, A. 2008. The New Liberalism. In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, eds. C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal, 234–254. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Morgenthau, H. 2005. Politics among Nations. 7th ed. New York: McGraw Hill.
Mulvad, A. 2015. Competing Hegemonic Projects within China’s Variegated Capitalism: ‘Liberal’ Guangdong vs. ‘Statist’ Chongqing. New Political Economy 20(2): 199–227.
Navarro, P. 2007. The Coming China Wars: Where They Will Be Fought, How They Can Be Won. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Financial Times Press.
Nolan, P. 2012. Is China Buying the World? Cambridge: Polity.
OECD. 2010a. Perspectives on Global Development, 2010, Shifting Wealth. Paris: OECD Development Centre.
OECD. 2010b. Perspectives of Global Development, 2010, Shifting Wealth: Summary. http://www.oecd.org/dev/pgd/45451514.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2013.
O’ Neill, J. 2001. Building Better Global Economic BRICs. Goldman Sachs Global Economics Paper no. 66, pp. 1–16.
O’ Neill, J. 2013. The Growth Map. London: Portfolio Penguin.
O’Neill, J. 2014. The MINT Countries: The Next Economic Giants. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-25548060. Accessed 28 Feb 2014.
O’Neill, J., D. Wilson, R. Purushothaman, and A. Stupnytska. 2005. How Solid Are the BRICs? Goldman Sachs Global Economics Paper no. 134, pp.1–24.
Pomeranz, K. 2001. The Great Divergence: China, Europe and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Prebisch, R. 1959. Commercial Policy in the Underdeveloped Countries. American Economic Review 44: 251–273.
Radelet, S. 2010. Emerging Africa. Washington: Center for Global Development.
Ramo, J. 2004. The Beijing Consenus: Notes on the New Physics of Chinese Power. London: Foreign Policy Centre.
Rachman, G. (2010) Zero Sum World (New York: Atlantic).
Rodrik, D. 2015. Premature Deindustrialization. Cambridge: Harvard University, unpublished paper.
Rosnick, D., and M. Weisbrot. 2014. Latin American Growth in the Twenty First Century. http://www.cepr.net/documents/terms-of-trade-2014-05.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2015.
Rostow, W. 1960. The Stages of Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rotberg, R. (ed.). 2008. China into Africa: Trade, Aid and Influence. Washington: Brookings Institution.
Rotberg, R. 2013. Africa Emerges. Cambridge: Polity.
Rucki, S. 2011. Global Economic Crisis and China’s Challenge to Global Hegemony: A Neo-Gramscian Approach. New Political Science 33(3): 335–355.
Saull, R. 2012. Rethinking Hegemony: Uneven Development, Historical Blocs and the World Economic Crisis. International Studies Quarterly 56(2): 323–338.
Singer, H. 1950. The Distribution of Gains from Trade between Investing and Borrowing Countries. American Economic Review 40: 473–485.
Skidmore, T. (2010) Brazil (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Subin, V. 2014. BRICS Viewed from Russia. Pambazuka News, March 20. http://www.pambazuka.org/en/category/features/86658/print. Accessed 26 Mar 2015.
Taylor, I. 2014. Africa Rising? London: James Currey.
The Economist. 2012. The Rise of State Capitalism. January 21.
UNCTAD. 2013. World Investment Report 2013. Geneva: UNCTAD.
UNCTAD. 2014a. Trade and Development Report 2014. Geneva: UNCTAD.
UNCTAD. 2014b. World Investment Report 2014. Geneva: UNCTAD.
UNCTAD. 2015a. Trade and Development Report 2015. Geneva: UNCTAD.
UNCTAD. 2015b. World Investment Report 2015. Geneva: UNCTAD.
UNCTAD. 2015c. UNCTAD Handbook of Statistics. http://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationWebflyer.aspx?publicationid=1414. Accessed 19 Feb 2016.
UNDP. 2013. Human Development Report 2013. New York: UNDP.
US Census Bureau. 2015. Trade in Goods and Services with China. www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html. Accessed 16 Feb 2015.
US Treasury Department. 2013. Major Foreign Holders of Treasury Securities. http://www.treasury.gov/ticdata/Publish/mfh.txt. Accessed 7 Mar 2014.
Wade, R. 1990. Governing the Market. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wallerstein, I. 1974. The Modern World System, vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.
Wallerstein, I. 2003. The Decline of American Power. New York: New Press.
Waltz, K. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: Random House.
Weeks, J. 2010. Growth and Employment in Africa. London: SOAS, CDPR, 1–51. http://jweeks.org/2010%20Growth%20and%20Employment%20in%20Africa.pdf. Accessed 22 Nov 2014.
World Bank. 2002. Globalization, Growth and Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yeyati, E., and T. Williams. 2012. Emerging Economies in the 2000s: Real Decoupling and Financial Recoupling. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no. 5961, Washington.
Zhao, S. (2010) ‘The China Model: Can it Replace the Western Model of Modernization’, Journal of Contemporary China 19(65): 419–36.
Zhu, L. 2010. China’s Foreign Policy Debates, Chaillot Paper No. 121, Paris, Institute for Security Studies, European Union, September [Online]. www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/cp121-China_s_Foreign_Policy_Debates.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2016.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kiely, R. (2016). The “Rise of the South” and International Relations and Development Theory. In: The Rise and Fall of Emerging Powers. Global Reordering. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34012-8_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34012-8_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34011-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34012-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)