Skip to main content

The “Rise of the South” and International Relations and Development Theory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Rise and Fall of Emerging Powers

Part of the book series: Global Reordering ((GRP))

  • 1760 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter introduces the argument that the South has risen in recent years. It outlines two initial arguments: (1) that there has been a rise and this is a threat to the USA and the West; (2) that there has been a rise and this is because of market friendly policies as advocated by the West. It then relates these views to international relations (IR) theory—showing how realists and liberal internationalists respond to these questions—and shows that while these approaches are different, they are not objective, but in many respects “recommendations” for how the USA should respond to these changes. It then introduces approaches more critical of US hegemony (world systems theory [WST], global history and dependency theory), and in doing so shows how these are also perspectives on development. The chapter then moves on to explicitly consider the development question, showing how older modernisation theory overlaps, despite their considerable differences, with contemporary neoliberalism, in that both see contact with “the West” as desirable and progressive. And in particular I show how liberal internationalism and neoliberal political economy can be seen as new versions of modernisation theory. The chapter then focuses in more depth on dependency theory, arguing that, for all its problems, this approach does address important questions about inequality, marginalisation and subordination in the international order. The chapter then suggests that we might think of the rise (and fall) of the South in terms of modernisation and dependency approaches (rather than the specific details of these problematic theories), albeit updated to take account of new realities (including the uneven and unequal effects of China’s rise and premature industrialisation in much of the rest of the South). The final section provides an initial introduction to the rise and fall of the South through the lens of these two broad approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alden, C., S. Morphet, and M. Vieira. 2012. The South in World Politics. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. 1989. Asia’s Next Giant. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrighi, G. 2007. Adam Smith in Beijing. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, A. 2013. Beyond Myths, Lies and Stereotypes: The Political Economy of a “New Scramble for Africa”. New Political Economy 18(2): 227–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ban, C. (2013) ‘Brazil’s liberal neo-developmentalism’, Review of International Political Economy 20(2): 241–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, H. 1979. Sociology of Development versus Sociology of Underdevelopment. In Development Theory: Four Critical Essays, ed. D. Lehmann, 77–106. London: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bin Wong, R. 1997. China Transformed. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond, P., and A. Garcia (eds.). 2015. BRICS: An Anti-Capitalist Critique. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, D. 1985. Marxism and Development Sociology: Interpreting the Impasse. World Development 13(8): 761–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremmer, I. 2010. The End of the Free Market. New York: Portfolio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breslin, S. 2011. The “China Model” and the Global Crisis: From Friedrich List to a Chinese Mode of Governance? International Affairs 87(6): 1323–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. 2012. Full Planet, Empty Plates. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRICS (2013) ‘Fifth BRICS Summit’, available at http://www.brics5.co.za (Accessed June 6, 2015).

  • Campos, P.H. 2015. The Transnationalization of Brazilian Construction Companies. In BRICS: An Anti-Capitalist Critique, eds. P. Bond and A. Garcia, 148–161. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. 2005. From Kosovo to Kabul. 2nd ed. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. 2002. Kicking Away the Ladder. London: Anthem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. 2007. Bad Samaritans. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn, C. 2013. BRICS and the Potentially Progressive Semi-Periphery. Pambazuka News, March 19. http://www.pambazuka.org/en/category/features/86647/print. Accessed 5 Mar 2015.

  • Chin, G. 2012. China as a “Net Donor”: Trading Dollars and Sense. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 25(4): 579–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. 2002. The Umbrella of US Power. New York: Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. 2003. The Breaking of Nations. New York: Atlantic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council on Foreign Relations. 2006. More than Humanitarianism: A Strategic US Approach to Africa. Independent Task Force Report No. 56. www.cfr.org/africa/more-thanhumanitarianism/p9302. Accessed 13 Apr 2014.

  • Cox, R. 1981. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory. Millennium 10(2): 126–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, W. 2014. The Limits of Neoliberalism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, R. 2012. The West Must Wake Up to the Growing Power of the BRICS. The Guardian, April 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desai, R. 2013. The BRICS Are Building a Challenge to Western Economic Supremacy. The Guardian, April 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deudney, D., and G.J. Ikenberry. 1999. The Nature and Sources of a Liberal International Order. Review of International Studies 25(2): 179–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirlik, A. 2006. Beijing Consensus, Beijing ‘Gongshi.’: Who Recognizes Whom and to What End? http://www.ids-uva.nl/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/9_Dirlik1.pdf. Accessed 6 Feb 2013.

  • Dollar, D., and A. Kraay. 2002. Growth Is Good for the Poor. Journal of Economic Growth 7: 195–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos, T. 1970. The Structure of Dependence. American Economic Review 60(May): 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, P. 2013. Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa: BRICS Go over the Wall. Asia Times, March 27, 2013. http://www.atimes.com/atimes/World/WOR-01-260313.html. Accessed 26 Mar 2015.

  • Evans, P. 1995. Embedded Autonomy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Times. 2011. The End of Hegemony. September 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fine, B., and J. Saraswati (eds.). 2013. Beyond the Developmental State. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foot, R. 2006. Chinese Strategies in a US-Hegemonic Global Order: Accommodating and Hedging. International Affairs 82(1): 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A.G. 1969. Capitalism and Underdevelopment in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A.G. 1998. Re-Orient. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, K., and R. Porzecanski. 2010. The Dragon in the Room. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 2000. The Third Way and Its Critics. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman Sachs. 2010. Is This the “BRICs Decade”. BRICs Monthly 10(3): 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guan, E. 2010. Understanding Brazil’s Oil Industry: Policy Dynamics and Self-Sufficiency. Journal of Emerging Knowledge on Emerging Markets 2: 26–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halper, S. 2010. The Beijing Consensus. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hameiri, S., and L. Jones. 2016. Rising Powers and State Transformation. European Journal of International Relations 18(1): 53–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, H.F. 2016. The China Boom: Why China Will Not Rule the World. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, G.J. 2008. The Rise of China and the Future of the West: Can the Liberal System Survive? Foreign Affairs 87(1): 23–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, R. 2012. Latin America and China—A New Dependency? Third World Quarterly 33(9): 1337–1358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan, R. 2012. The World America Made. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplinsky, R. and M. Morris (2008) ‘do the Asian drivers undermine export oriented development in Latin America?’, World Development 36(2): 254–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, S. 2010. The Myth of the Beijing Consensus. Journal of Contemporary China 19(65): 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, R.O., and J.S. Nye. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. 4th ed. Boston: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, P. 2009. The Second World. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiely, R. 2007. The New Political Economy of Development. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiely, R. 2010. Rethinking Imperialism. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiely, R. 2015. The BRICs, US ‘Decline’ and Global Transformations. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirshner, J. 2010. The Tragedy of Offensive Realism: Classical Realism and the Rise of China. European Journal of International Relations 18(1): 53–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitching, G. 1982. Development and Underdevelopment in Historical Perspective. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, J. 2014. China as a Developmental State. The World Economy 37(10): 1335–1347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A. 2004. State Directed Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lal, D. 1984. The Poverty of ‘Development Economics’. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.K. 2014. The Chimera of Global Convergence. New Left Review 87(2): 81–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundestad, G. 1998. ‘Empire’ by Integration: The United States and European Integration, 1945-1997. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahbubani, K. 2008. The New Asian Hemisphere. New York: Public Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. 2001. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. 2006. China’s Unpeaceful Rise. Current History 105(April): 160–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. 1997. Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics. International Organization 51(4): 513–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. 2008. The New Liberalism. In The Oxford Handbook of International Relations, eds. C. Reus-Smit and D. Snidal, 234–254. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H. 2005. Politics among Nations. 7th ed. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvad, A. 2015. Competing Hegemonic Projects within China’s Variegated Capitalism: ‘Liberal’ Guangdong vs. ‘Statist’ Chongqing. New Political Economy 20(2): 199–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Navarro, P. 2007. The Coming China Wars: Where They Will Be Fought, How They Can Be Won. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Financial Times Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolan, P. 2012. Is China Buying the World? Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2010a. Perspectives on Global Development, 2010, Shifting Wealth. Paris: OECD Development Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2010b. Perspectives of Global Development, 2010, Shifting Wealth: Summary. http://www.oecd.org/dev/pgd/45451514.pdf. Accessed 26 Jan 2013.

  • O’ Neill, J. 2001. Building Better Global Economic BRICs. Goldman Sachs Global Economics Paper no. 66, pp. 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’ Neill, J. 2013. The Growth Map. London: Portfolio Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, J. 2014. The MINT Countries: The Next Economic Giants. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-25548060. Accessed 28 Feb 2014.

  • O’Neill, J., D. Wilson, R. Purushothaman, and A. Stupnytska. 2005. How Solid Are the BRICs? Goldman Sachs Global Economics Paper no. 134, pp.1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeranz, K. 2001. The Great Divergence: China, Europe and the Making of the Modern World Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prebisch, R. 1959. Commercial Policy in the Underdeveloped Countries. American Economic Review 44: 251–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radelet, S. 2010. Emerging Africa. Washington: Center for Global Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramo, J. 2004. The Beijing Consenus: Notes on the New Physics of Chinese Power. London: Foreign Policy Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachman, G. (2010) Zero Sum World (New York: Atlantic).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. 2015. Premature Deindustrialization. Cambridge: Harvard University, unpublished paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosnick, D., and M. Weisbrot. 2014. Latin American Growth in the Twenty First Century. http://www.cepr.net/documents/terms-of-trade-2014-05.pdf. Accessed 5 Mar 2015.

  • Rostow, W. 1960. The Stages of Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotberg, R. (ed.). 2008. China into Africa: Trade, Aid and Influence. Washington: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotberg, R. 2013. Africa Emerges. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rucki, S. 2011. Global Economic Crisis and China’s Challenge to Global Hegemony: A Neo-Gramscian Approach. New Political Science 33(3): 335–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saull, R. 2012. Rethinking Hegemony: Uneven Development, Historical Blocs and the World Economic Crisis. International Studies Quarterly 56(2): 323–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, H. 1950. The Distribution of Gains from Trade between Investing and Borrowing Countries. American Economic Review 40: 473–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skidmore, T. (2010) Brazil (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Subin, V. 2014. BRICS Viewed from Russia. Pambazuka News, March 20. http://www.pambazuka.org/en/category/features/86658/print. Accessed 26 Mar 2015.

  • Taylor, I. 2014. Africa Rising? London: James Currey.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. 2012. The Rise of State Capitalism. January 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2013. World Investment Report 2013. Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2014a. Trade and Development Report 2014. Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2014b. World Investment Report 2014. Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2015a. Trade and Development Report 2015. Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2015b. World Investment Report 2015. Geneva: UNCTAD.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD. 2015c. UNCTAD Handbook of Statistics. http://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationWebflyer.aspx?publicationid=1414. Accessed 19 Feb 2016.

  • UNDP. 2013. Human Development Report 2013. New York: UNDP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau. 2015. Trade in Goods and Services with China. www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html. Accessed 16 Feb 2015.

  • US Treasury Department. 2013. Major Foreign Holders of Treasury Securities. http://www.treasury.gov/ticdata/Publish/mfh.txt. Accessed 7 Mar 2014.

  • Wade, R. 1990. Governing the Market. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. 1974. The Modern World System, vol. 1. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. 2003. The Decline of American Power. New York: New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. 1979. Theory of International Politics. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J. 2010. Growth and Employment in Africa. London: SOAS, CDPR, 1–51. http://jweeks.org/2010%20Growth%20and%20Employment%20in%20Africa.pdf. Accessed 22 Nov 2014.

  • World Bank. 2002. Globalization, Growth and Poverty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yeyati, E., and T. Williams. 2012. Emerging Economies in the 2000s: Real Decoupling and Financial Recoupling. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper no. 5961, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, S. (2010) ‘The China Model: Can it Replace the Western Model of Modernization’, Journal of Contemporary China 19(65): 419–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, L. 2010. China’s Foreign Policy Debates, Chaillot Paper No. 121, Paris, Institute for Security Studies, European Union, September [Online]. www.iss.europa.eu/uploads/media/cp121-China_s_Foreign_Policy_Debates.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kiely, R. (2016). The “Rise of the South” and International Relations and Development Theory. In: The Rise and Fall of Emerging Powers. Global Reordering. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34012-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics