Skip to main content

Marital Power and the Law

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Divorce in Transnational Families
  • 469 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the power relations between the spouses. Although transnational marriage can be connected to a range of intersecting power-related issues, such as the division of labour during the marriage, access to divorce and dependent residence status, little is known about the power relations in transnational marriages or their impact on divorce. In this chapter, I will provide a theoretical framework and focus on two power-related issues: the division of labour in marriage and domestic violence. As we will see, these two issues are of great importance for power relations in transnational marriages, due to shifts in gender roles related to migration, and state interventions through migration law.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The interviewee uses the Dutch word ‘man’, a word which means both adult male and husband.

  2. 2.

    Korvorst and Traag (2010). In 2009, 57 % of couples had two employed partners. However, only in 20 % of these couples, both partners worked full-time, and in over 80 % it was the husband who had a highest income. (CBS, see: http://www.cbs.nl/nl-NL/menu/themas/inkomen-bestedingen/publicaties/artikelen/archief/ 2011/2011-3291-wm.htm, accessed on 22 July 2013).

  3. 3.

    I suspect the interviewee refers to the social security procedures for illness he started after being expelled from the Netherlands.

  4. 4.

    With 4.9 % of employees in geriatric care being male and 3.4 % in child care in 2006 (van der Velde et al. 2009: p. 8-13).

  5. 5.

    This meant that, for example, when initially approaching NGOs or lawyers for potential respondents in the first phase of my fieldwork I also asked them not to include cases of domestic violence. However, after the first four interviews all contained at least some reference to domestic violence, I changed my approach and no longer mentioned domestic violence as an issue to exclude when looking for research participants.

  6. 6.

    Unfortunately I have not been able to access the full report, but a summary can be found on the Women Living Under Muslim Law website http://www.wluml.org/fr/node/6113, accessed 13 May 2013.

  7. 7.

    There were more reasons to suspect underreporting, for example, that no Dutch-Moroccans over 50 reported any domestic violence (van Dijk and Oppenhuis 2002: p. 9, p. 21-24).

  8. 8.

    For men in both cases 1 %.

  9. 9.

    A few lawyers I interviewed for this research also mentioned that if there had been violence in the marriage they generally advised mothers not to mention this fact in court unless they had proof, such as a criminal conviction of the father.

  10. 10.

    When quoting from his former wife’s notes, René uses English instead of Dutch.

  11. 11.

    As their marriage had not lasted long enough to grant him independent residence and because there was no contact arrangement, he could not claim residence on the ground of the presence of his child in the Netherlands.

  12. 12.

    Quotation marks gesticulated by interviewee.

References

  • 2011. Morocco: Challenges with addressing domestic violence in compliance with the Convention Against Torture. 47th Session of the Committee Against Torture (31 October–25 November, 2011). Global Rights/The advocates for Human Rights.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, K.L. 1997. Gender, status, and domestic violence: An integration of feminist and family violence approaches. Journal of Marriage and the Family: 655–669.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartowski, John P. 1999. One Step Forward, One Step Back: “Progressive Traditionalism” and the Negotiation of Domestic Labor in Evangelical Families. Gender Issues 17(4): 37–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blood, Robert Oscar Jr., and M. Wolfe. 1960. Husbands & wives: the dynamics of married living. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Thea, Margarita Frederico, Lesley Hewitt, and Rosemary Sheehan. 2001. The Child Abuse and Divorce Myth. Child Abuse Review 10(2): 113–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buitelaar, Marjo. 2000. Het liefst gewoon een Marokkaan? Over de partnerkeuze van hoogopgeleide vrouwen van Marokkaanse afkomst in Nederland. In Liefst een gewoon huwelijk? Creatie en conflict in levensverhalen van jonge migrantenvrouwen, ed. Kristel Luyckx, 139–180. Leuven: Acco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement, Christine, Corine van Egten, and Saskia de Hoog. 2008. Nieuwe Gezinnen. Scheidingen en de vorming van stiefgezinnen: E-Quality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diop-Sidibé, Nafissatou, Jacquelyn C. Campbell, and Stan Becker. 2006. Domestic Violence Against Women in Egypt—Wife Beating and Health Outcomes. Social Science & Medicine 62(5): 1260–1277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentry, James W., Suraj Commuri, and Sunkyu Jun. 2003. Review of Literature on Gender in the Family. Academy of Marketing Science Review 2003 (1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, Edith. 2009. Omgaan met signalen van ex-partners over kindermishandeling. Jeugd en Co Kennis 3(2): 8–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmers, Dini. 2002. Gescheurde bedden. In Oplossingen voor gestrande huwelijken, Amsterdam, 1753–1810. Hilversum: Verloren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, Peter G., Claire V. Crooks, and Samantha E. Poisson. 2003. Common misconceptions in addressing domestic violence in child custody disputes. Juvenile and Family Court Journal 54(4): 57–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jewkes, Rachel, Jonathan Levin, and Loveday Penn-Kekana. 2002. Risk Factors for Domestic Violence: Findings from a South African Cross-sectional Study. Social science & medicine 55(9): 1603–1617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Michael P., and K.J. Ferraro. 2000. Research on Domestic Violence in the 1990s: Making Distinctions. Journal of Marriage and Family 62(4): 948–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, Michael P., and Janel M. Leone. 2005. The Differential Effects of Intimate Terrorism and Situational Couple Violence. Journal of Family Issues 26(3): 322–349. doi:10.1177/0192513x04270345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komter, Aafke Elisabeth. 1985. De macht van de vanzelfsprekendheid in relaties tussen vrouwen en mannen. Leiden: University of Leiden. Proefschrift.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Hidden Power in Marriage. Gender & Society 3(2): 187–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korvorst, Marjolein, and Tanja Traag. 2010. De verdeling van arbeid en zorg tussen vaders en moeders. Bevolkingstrends (2e kwartaal 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukes, Steven. 1978. Power: A radical view. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luyckx, Kristel. 2000. Liefst een gewoon huwelijk? Creatie en conflict in levensverhalen van jonge migrantenvrouwen. Ed. A. De Munynck, M.C. Foblets, B. Hubeau, A. Martens and S. Parmentier, Minderheden in de samenleving. Leuven:Acco.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, Gerald W. 1980. Family Power: The Assessment of a Decade of Theory and Research, 1970–1979. Journal of Marriage and the Family 42(4): 841–854.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyke, Karen D. 1994. Women’s Employment as a Gift or Burden? Marital Power Across Marriage, Divorce, and Remarriage. Gender & Society 8(1): 73–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Römkens, Renée. 2010. Omstreden gelijkheid. Over de constructie van (on)gelijkheid van vrouwen en mannen in partnergeweld. Justitiële verkenningen 36(8): 11–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speelman, Gé. 2001. Keeping Faith. Muslim-Christian Couples and Interreligious Dialogue. Meinema: Zoetermeer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichenor, Veronica. 2005. Maintaining Men’s Dominance: Negotiating Identity and Power When She Earns More. Sex Roles 53(3/4): 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Velde, F., D.A. Albers, and K.D. Hekkert. 2009. Mannen in zorgberoepen en kinderopvang. Onderzoeksprogramma Arbeidsmarkt in Zorg en Welzijn.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Dijk, Tom, and Erik Oppenhuis. 2002. Huiselijk geweld onder Surinamers, Antillianen en Arubanen, Marokkanen en Turken in Nederland : aard, omvang en hulpverlening. Hilversum: Intomart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verwijs, Rianne, and Katinka Lünnemann. 2012. Partnergeweld. Achtergrond en risicofactoren. Utrecht: Verweij Jonker Instituut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogler, Carolyn. 1998. Money in the Household: Some Underlying Issues of Power. The Sociological Review 46(4): 687–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sportel, I. (2016). Marital Power and the Law. In: Divorce in Transnational Families. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34009-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34009-8_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34008-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34009-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics