Abstract
Why is mathematics education endorsed even by people who know little mathematics and almost never use it? We explore this question with reference to a theoretical framework inspired by anthropology and psychoanalysis. Our answer is that participation in mathematics education generates ambivalence towards mathematics, where it is at the same time loved and feared. The response to this ambivalence is to endorse mathematics per proxy, by sending children to school where they put up a “show” of mathematics-love. By means of a psychological mechanism involving what we will call the naïve observer this arrangement allows people to both seem to love mathematics and at the same time keep it at arm’s length.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. (1997). Dialectic of enlightenment. London: Verso.
Matematikdelegationen. (2004). Att lyfta matematiken: Intresse, lärande, kompetens: Betänkande. Statens offentliga utredningar 2004:97. Stockholm: Fritzes offentliga publikationer.
Berggren, H. (1995). Seklets ungdom: Retorik, politik och modernitet 1900-1939. Stockholm: Tiden.
Boltanski, L. (2011). On critique: A sociology of emancipation. Cambridge: Polity.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. London: Sage.
Butler, J., Laclau, E., & Žižek, S. (2000). Contingency, hegemony, universality: Contemporary dialogues on the left. London: Verso.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2004). Anti-oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. London: Continuum.
Dowling, P. (1998). The sociology of mathematics education: Mathematical myths/pedagogic texts. London: Falmer.
Dowling, P. (2010). Abandoning mathematics and hard labour in schools. A new sociology of knowledge and curriculum reform. In C. Bergsten, E. Jablonka, & T. Wedege (Eds.), Mathematics and mathematics education: Cultural and social dimensions: Proceedings of MADIF 7 (pp. 1–30). Linköping: Svensk förening för matematikdidaktisk forskning (SMDF).
Fontaine, J. S. L. (1986). Initiation. Manchester: University Press.
Fries, M. (2013). Mathematical anxiety. A literature review regarding research 2008-2013. Malmö högskola, Lärande och samhälle.
Gensing, P., & Reisin, A. (2013). Der Präventivstaat: Warum Gesundheits-, Kontroll- und Verbotswahn Freiheit und Demokratie gefährden. Köln, Germany: Lingen Verlag.
Graeber, D. (2015). The utopia of rules: On technology, stupidity, and the secret joys of bureaucracy. Brooklyn: Melville House.
Hall, S. G. (1905). Adolscence, its psychology and its relations to psychology, anthropology, sociology, sex, crime, religion and education. London: D. Appleton and Co.
von Hayek, F. A. (2007). The road to serfdom: Text and documents. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Huizinga, J. (1998). Homo ludens: A study of play-element in culture. London: Routledge.
Hultén, E. (2010). Mattebluffen. Aftonbladet. Retrieved January 31, 2010.
Illich, I., & Cayley, D. (2005). The rivers north of the future: The testament of Ivan Illich. Toronto, ON; New York: House of Anansi Press; Distributed in the U.S. by Publishers Group West.
Hög tid för matematik. (2001). Göteborg: Nationellt centrum för matematikutbildning, Göteborgs universitet.
Johnson, C. (2004). Inte så himla viktigt att kunna matematik. DN debatt. Retrieved October 31, 2004.
Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.
Lave, J. (1992). Word problems: A microcosm of theories of learning. In P. Light & G. Butterworth (Eds.), Context and cognition: Ways of learning and knowing (pp. 74–92). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
Lundin, S. (2008). Skolans matematik: En kritisk analys av den svenska skolmatematikens förhistoria, uppkomst och utveckling. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
Lundin, S. (2010). The missing piece. An interpretation of mathematics education using some ideas from Zizek. In C. Bergsten, E. Jablonka, & T. Wedege (Eds.), Mathematics and mathematics education: Cultural and social dimensions: Proceedings of MADIF 7 (pp. 168–178). Linköping: Svensk förening för matematikdidaktisk forskning (SMDF).
Lundin, S. (2011). Hating school, loving mathematics. The ideological function of critique and reform in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1), 73–85.
Meyer, J. (1977). Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363.
Pais, A. (2013). An ideology critique of the use-value of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(1), 15–34.
Palm, T. (2002). The realism of mathematical school tasks: Features and consequences. Umeå: Umeå University.
Paulsen, R. (2014). Empty labor: Idleness and workplace resistance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peukert, D. J. K. (1989). Max Webers Diagnose der Moderne. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.
Pfaller, R. (2014). On the pleasure principle in culture: Illusions without owners. London: Verso.
Pfaller, R. (2011). Wofür es sich zu leben lohnt. Elemente materialistischer Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag.
Piaget, J. (1957). The myth of the sensory origin of scientific knowledge. Psychology and Epistemology: Towards a Theory of Knowledge, 45–62.
Popper, K. (2013). The open society and its enemies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Rappaport, R. A. (1999). Ritual and religion in the making of humanity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rorty, R. (1979). Philosophy and the mirror of nature. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Sloterdijk, P. (1987). Critique of cynical reason. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London: Routledge.
Weber, M. (1992). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. London: Routledge.
Winnicott, D. W. (2005). Playing and reality. London: Routledge.
Žižek, S. (1999). The ticklish subject: The absent centre of political ontology. New York: Verso.
Žižek, S. (2008). The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lundin, S., Christensen, D.S. (2017). Mathematics Education as Praying Wheel: How Adults Avoid Mathematics by Pushing It onto Children. In: Straehler-Pohl, H., Bohlmann, N., Pais, A. (eds) The Disorder of Mathematics Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34006-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34006-7_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34005-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34006-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)