Skip to main content

Optimal Flood Mitigation over Flood Propagation Approximations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming (CPAIOR 2016)

Abstract

Globally, flooding is the most frequent among all natural disasters, commonly resulting in damage to infrastructure, economic catastrophe, and loss of life. Since the flow of water is influenced by the shape and height of topography, an effective mechanism for preventing and directing floods is to use structures that increase height, e.g., levees and sandbags. In this paper, we introduce the Optimal Flood Mitigation Problem (OFMP), which optimizes the positioning of barriers to protect critical assets with respect to a flood scenario. In its most accurate form, the OFMP is a challenging optimization problem that combines nonlinear partial differential equations with discrete barrier choices. The OFMP requires solutions that combine approaches from computational simulation and optimization. Herein, we derive linear approximations to the shallow water equations and embed them in the OFMP. Preliminary results demonstrate their effectiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This is different from evacuation settings, in which the flood arrival time at various locations is critical information.

References

  1. Brekelmans, R., den Hertog, D., Roos, K., Eijgenraam, C.: Safe dike heights at minimal costs: the nonhomogeneous case. Oper. Res. 60(6), 1342–1355 (2012). http://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/abs/10.1287/opre.1110.1028

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Che, D., Mays, L.W.: Development of an optimization/simulation model for real-time flood-control operation of river-reservoirs systems. Water Resour. Manage. 29(11), 3987–4005 (2015). http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11269-015-1041-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chertock, A., Cui, S., Kurganov, A., Wu, T.: Well-balanced positivity preserving central-upwind scheme for the shallow water system with friction terms. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 78(6), 355–383 (2015). http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fld.4023

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Colombo, R.M., Guerra, G., Herty, M., Schleper, V.: Optimal control in networks of pipes and canals. SIAM J. Control Optim. 48(3), 2032–2050 (2009). http://epubs.siam.org/doi/abs/10.1137/080716372

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Downton, M.W., Miller, J.Z.B., Pielke, R.A.: Reanalysis of U.S. National Weather Service flood loss database. Nat. Hazards Rev. 6(1), 13–22 (2005). http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2005)6%3A1(13)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Judi, D., Tasseff, B., Bent, R., Pan, F.: LA-UR 14–21247: topography-based flood planning and optimization capability development report. Technical report, Los Alamos National Laboratory (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kalyanapu, A.J., Shankar, S., Pardyjak, E.R., Judi, D.R., Burian, S.J.: Assessment of GPU computational enhancement to a 2D flood model. Environ. Model. Softw. 26(8), 1009–1016 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2011.02.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mei, X., Decaudin, P., Hu, B.G.: Fast hydraulic erosion simulation and visualization on GPU. In: 15th Pacific Conference on Computer Graphics and Applications, Maui, Hawaii, pp. 47–56 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pielke, R.A., Downton, M.W.: Precipitation and damaging floods: trends in the United States, 1932–97. J. Clim. 13(20), 3625–3637 (2000). http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013%3C3625%3APADFTI%3E2.0.CO%3B2

    Google Scholar 

  10. Proverbs, D., Mambretti, S., Brebbia, C., Wrachien, D.: Flood Recovery Innovation and Response III. WIT Press, Southampton (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rydlund, P.H.: Peak discharge, flood profile, flood inundation, and debris movement accompanying the failure of the upper reservoir at the Taum Sauk pump storage facility near Lesterville, Missouri. Technical report (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge our early discussions on flood modeling and mitigation with Feng Pan and David Judi at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory [6]. The work at LANL was carried out under the auspices of the National Nuclear Security Administration of the U.S. Department of Energy at Los Alamos National Laboratory under Contract No. DE-AC52-06NA25396.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Byron Tasseff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tasseff, B., Bent, R., Van Hentenryck, P. (2016). Optimal Flood Mitigation over Flood Propagation Approximations. In: Quimper, CG. (eds) Integration of AI and OR Techniques in Constraint Programming. CPAIOR 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9676. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33954-2_26

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33954-2_26

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33953-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33954-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics