Skip to main content

What Is Wild Food Plant

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Changes in the Use of Wild Food Plants in Estonia

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Plant Science ((BRIEFSPLANT))

  • 280 Accesses

Abstract

Usually ethnobotanical studies define the domain of wild edible plants through the etic perspective, in order to be understandable to other researchers within the discipline. Most often such definition underlines the principles of inclusion of plants into some specific study. Ethnobotanists look at wild through the level of the domestication of the plants, situating them just on one side of the continuum of plant–human relationship. For example, Logan and Dixon (1994) define wild plant through the habitat without secondary disturbance. Dufour and Wilson (1994) and Molina et al. (2014) indicate that wild plant is neither managed nor cultivated. Turner et al. (2011) consider wild edibles in their review on the literature of internationally used wild food plants only plants gathered without “particular manipulation”. However, they admit some extent of manipulation for all wild resources.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Cruz-Garcia GS, Price L (2011) Ethnobotanical investigation of ‘wild’ food plants used by rice farmers in Kalasin, Northeast Thailand. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed 7:33

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Garcia GS, Price L (2014) Human-induced movement of wild food plant biodiversity across farming systems is essential to ensure their availability. J Ethnobiol 34:68–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufour DL, Wilson WM (1994) Characteristics of ‘wild’ plant foods used by indigenous populations in Amazonia. In: Etkin NL (ed) Eating on the wild side: the pharmacologic, ecologic, and social implications of using noncultigens. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 114–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalle R, Sõukand R (2013a) Wild plants eaten in childhood: retrospective of 1970s–1990s Estonia. Bot J Linn Soc 172:239–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalle R, Sõukand R (2013b) Eesti looduslikud toidutaimed. Kasutamine18. sajandist tänapäevani [Wild edible plants of Estonia. Use from 18th century until modern days]. Varrak, Tallinn

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan M, Dixon AR (1994) Agriculture and the acquisition of medicinal plant knowledge. In: Etkin N (ed) Eating on the wild side: the pharmacologic, ecologic and social implications of using noncultigens. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 25–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Łuczaj Ł, Pieroni A, Tardío J, Pardo-de-Santayana M, Sõukand R, Svanberg I, Kalle R (2012) Wild food plant use in 21st century Europe: the disappearance of old traditions and the search for new cuisines involving wild edibles. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae 81(4):359–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menendez-Baceta G, Aceituno-Mata L, Tardío J, Reyes-García V, Pardo-de-Santayana M (2012) Wild edible plants traditionally gathered in Gorbeialdea (Biscay, Basque Country). Genet Resour Crop Evol 59:1329–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molina M, Tardío J, Aceituno-Mata L, Morales R, Reyes-García V, Pardo-de-Santayana M (2014) Weeds and food diversity: natural yield assessment and future alternatives for traditionally consumed wild vegetables. J Ethnobiol 34:44–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nebel S, Pieroni A, Heinrich M (2006) Ta chòrta: wild edible greens used in the Graecanic area in Calabria, Southern Italy. Appetite 47:333–342

    Google Scholar 

  • Pieroni A, Nebel S, Quave C, Münz H, Heinrich M (2002) Ethnopharmacology of liakra: traditional weedy vegetables of the Arbëreshë of the Vulture area in southern Italy. J Ethnopharmacol 81:165–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rosch E (1978) Principles of categorization. In: Rosch E, Loyd BB (eds) Cognition and categorization. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, pp 27–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosch E (1999) Reclaiming concepts. In: Núñez R, Freeman WJ (eds) Reclaiming cognition: the primacy of action, intention and emotion. Thorverton, Eng.: Imprint Academic. Published simultaneously as a special issue of The Journal of Consciousness Studies 6:11–12, 61–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Sõukand R (2014) What are the main criteria of science? Unconventional methods in ethnopharmacology. J Ethnopharmacol 154:475–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sõukand R, Kalle R (2015) Emic conceptualization of a ‘wild edible plant’ in Estonia in the second half of the 20th century. Trames 19:15–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner NJ, Łuczaj ŁJ, Migliorini P, Pieroni A, Dreon AL, Sacchetti LE, Paoletti MG (2011) Edible and tended wild plants, traditional ecological knowledge and agroecology. Crit Rev Plant Sci 30(1–2):198–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sõukand, R., Kalle, R. (2016). What Is Wild Food Plant. In: Changes in the Use of Wild Food Plants in Estonia. SpringerBriefs in Plant Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33949-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics