Abstract
Despite scientific and technological advances, current early warning systems (EWSs) cannot be seen as a promising answer for disaster prevention, given that they cannot be seen as an articulated system, but as a component of the capacity-building process needed to achieve disaster risk reduction (DRR) and management (DRM). According to the United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction, disaster risk reduction (DRR) describes the policy objective of anticipating future disaster risk, reducing existing exposure, vulnerability or hazard and strengthening resilience. Disaster risk management (DRM) describes the actions that aim to achieve this objective including prospective risk management, such as better planning, designed to avoid the construction of new risks; corrective risk management, designed to address pre-existing risks; and compensatory risk management, such as insurance that shares and spreads risks. This chapter proposes that EWS must be articulated. Early warning articulated systems (EWASs) can be defined as a coordinated structure integrated by the sound processes and sustained practices of ongoing partnerships between communities, scientists, authorities, decision makers, stake holders and every actor involved in the construction of risk. This is characterised by a responsible commitment to achieving and guaranteeing DRR and DRM in space and time. It should be based on disaster risk-integrated science within a legal and ethical framework on which multi-directional and permanent risk communication plays a central role in the construction of a culture of a risk conscious society. It is not exclusively intended to serve as a coordinated system of response, but most importantly is directed towards the comprehension of disaster risk by incorporating the understanding of root causes of disasters, risk perception and the different dimensions of vulnerability, resilience and adaptation. It also must be structured as a capacity-building progression that allows people to recognise the social construction of disaster risk and its potential consequences in order to consider likely disaster scenarios, risk management procedures, realistic measures and response strategies and actions, targeting preparedness, both individually and collectively, especially before critical times. Failure to integrate legally enforced frameworks and ethical codes into EWASs will increase the incoherence in government policies and practices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adam B, Van Loon J (2000) Introduction: repositioning risk; the challenge for social theory. In: Adam B, Beck U, Van Loon J (eds) The risk society and beyond: critical issues for social theory. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
Alcántara-Ayala I (2002) Geomorphology, natural hazards, vulnerability and prevention of natural disasters in developing countries. Geomorphology 47:107–124
Aven T, Renn O (2010) Risk management and governance concepts, guidelines and applications. Springer, Heidelberg
Benz A, Eberlein B (1999) The Europeanization of regional policies: patterns of multi-level governance. J Eur Public Policy 6(2):329–348
Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I, Wisner B (1994) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability, and disasters. Routledge, London, p 284
Bull-Kamanga L, Diagne K, Lavell A, Leon E, Lerise F, MacGregor H, Maskrey A, Meshack M, Pelling M, Reid H, Satterthwaite D, Songsore J, Westgate K, Yitambe A (2003) From everyday hazards to disasters: the accumulation of risk in urban areas. Environ Urban 15(1):193–204
Burton I (1997) Vulnerability and adaptive responses in the context of climate and climate change. Clim Change 36:185–196
Burton I, Kates RW, White GF (1978) The environment as hazard. Oxford University Press, New York
Campbell KK (1996) The rhetorical act, 2nd edn. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA
Cannon T (1993) A hazard need not a disaster make: vulnerability and the causes of ‘natural’ disasters. In: Merriman PA, Browitt CWA (eds) Natural disasters: protecting vulnerable communities. Thomas Telford, London, pp 92–105
Cannon T (1994) Vulnerability analysis and the explanation of natural disasters. In: Varley A (ed) Disasters development and environment. John Wiley, Chichester, pp 13–30
Congleton RD (2006) The story of Katrina: New Orleans and the political economy of catastrophe, Public Choice, 127:5–30
Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards, progress in human geography. London 20(4):529–539
Cutter SL, Ismail-Zadeh A, Alcántara-Ayala I, Altan O, Baker DN, Briceño S, Gupta H, Holloway A, Johnston D, McBean GA, Ogawa Y, Paton D, Porio E, Silbereisen RK, Takeuchi K, Valsecchi GB, Vogel C, Wu G (2015) Global risks: pool knowledge to stem losses from disasters. Nature 522:277–279
EM-DAT 2015. http://emdat.be/human_cost_natdis
Fischhoff B (1995) Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process. Risk Anal 15(2):137–145
Geist EL, Titov VV, Arcas D, Pollitz FF, Bilek SL (2007) Implications of the 26 December Sumatra-Andaman earthquake on tsunami forecast and assessment models for great subduction-zone earthquakes. Bull Seismol Soc Am 97:S249–S270, http://walrus.wr.usgs.gov/reports/reprints/Geist_BSSA_97.pdf
Geographical Survey Institute (2011) About crustal movement in March, 2011. http://www.gsi.go.jp/WNEW/PRESS-RELEASE/2011-goudou0408.htm (in Japanese)
Graumann A, Houston T, Lawrimore J, Levinson D, Lott N, McCown S, Stephens S, Wuertez D (2005) Hurricane Katrina, a climatological perspective. Technical Report 2005-01. Asheville, N.C., 28801-5696, NOAA/NESDIS, p 27
Headquarters for Earthquake Research Promotion (2011) Evaluation of the 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tōhoku Earthquake. http://www.jishin.go.jp/main/chousa/11mar_sanriku-oki2/index.htm (in Japanese)
Hewitt K, Burton I (1971) The hazardousness of a place: a regional ecology of damaging events. Department of Geography Research publication 6, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Hill LJ, Sparks RSJ, Rougier JC (2013) Risk assessment and uncertainty in natural hazards. In: Rougier J, Sparks S, Hill LJ (eds) Risk and uncertainty assessment for natural hazards. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–18
ICSU (2008) A science plan for integrated research on disaster risk: addressing the challenge of natural and human-induced environmental hazards. International Council for Science, Paris
Inderfurth KF, Fabrycky D, Cohen S (2005) The 2004 Tsunami: six month report. The SigurCenter Asia Papers, 23, p 27. http://www2.gwu.edu/~elliott/assets/docs/research/tsunamiinderfurth.pdf
IRDR (2013) Annual report for the integrated research on disaster risk (IRDR). http://www.irdrinternational.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/2013-IRDR-Annual-Report_web-ver.-7MB.pdf
IRGC (2005) IRGC White Paper No. 1. Risk governance—towards an integrative approach. IRGC, Geneva
IRGC (2008) An introduction to the IRGC Risk Governance Framework. IRGC, Geneva, Switzerland
Kasperson RE, Renn O, Slovic P, Brown HS, Emel J, Goble R, Kasperson JX, Ratick S (1988) The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Anal 8:177–187
Laska S (2004) What if hurricane Ivan had not missed New Orleans? Natural Hazards Observer, November 2004, XXIX. http://www.colorado.edu/hazards/o/archives/2004/nov04/nov04c.htm
Lavell A (2008) Community and local level disaster risk management: considerations as regards relations with poverty alleviation. A Contribution to the 2009 ISDR Global Assessment Report on Disaster Risk Reduction. http://www.desenredando.org/public/varios/2008/2008_ISDR_GAR_Lavell_CBRMPoverty.pdf
Levitt JI, Whitaker MC (2009) Introduction: “Truth crushed to earth will rise again”: Katrina and its aftermath. In: Levitt JI (ed) Hurricane Katrina, America’s unnatural disaster. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE, pp 1–21
Lyall C, Tait J (2004) Shifting policy debates and the implications for governance. In: Lyall C, Tait J (eds.) New modes of governance: developing an integrated policy approach to science, technology, risk and the environment. pp 3–17
Marulanda MC, Cardona OD, Barbat AH (2010) Revealing the socioeconomic impact of small disasters in Colombia using the DesInventar database. Disasters 34:552–570
Maskrey A (1989) Disaster mitigation: a community based approach. Oxfam, London
Maskrey A (compiler) (1993) Los desastres no son naturales. LA RED, p 166 (in Spanish)
Masozera M, Bailey M, Kerchner C (2007) Distribution of impacts of natural disasters across income groups: a case study of New Orleans. Ecol Econ 63:299–306
Mimura N, Yasuhara K, Kawagone S, Yokoki H, Kazama S (2011) Damage from the Great East Japan earthquake and tsunami—a quick report. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, pp 1–16
MLIT (2011) White paper on land, infrastructure, transport, and tourism in Japan, 2011. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport, and Tourism. http://www.mlit.go.jp/report/press/toshi07_hh_000056.html
National Police Agency of Japan (2015) Damage situation and police countermeasures associated with 2011 Tōhoku district-off the Pacific Ocean Earthquake, February 10, 2015. Emergency Disaster Countermeasures Headquarters. http://www.npa.go.jp/archive/keibi/biki/higaijokyo_e.pdf. Accessed 13 Feb 2015
National Research Council (1989) Improving risk communication. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, p 21
Oliver-Smith A (2006) Disasters and forced migration in the 21st century. http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Oliver-Smith/. Accessed 15 June 2008
Oliver-Smith A, Hoffmann SM (eds) (1999) The angry earth: disaster in anthropological perspective. Routledge, New York
Paris R, Lavigne F, Wassimer P, Sartohadi J (2007) Coastal sedimentation associated with the December 26, 2004 tsunami in LhokNga, west Banda Aceh (Sumatra, Indonesia). Mar Geol 238(1–4):93–106
Pelling M (2003) The vulnerability of cities: natural disasters and social resilience. Earthscan, London, p 212
Rogers MB, Amlot R, Rubin GJ, Wessely S, Krieger K (2007) Mediating the social and psychological impacts of terrorist attacks: the role of risk perception and risk communication. Int Rev Psychiatry 19(3):279–288
SSHAC (1997) Recommendations for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: guidance on uncertainty and use of experts (US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report NUREG/CR-6372). Lawrence Livermore National Lab, Livermore, CA
Takeuchi K, Chavoshian A (2011) Quick report of Great Eastern Japan earthquake and tsunami (As of 22 April 2011). International Centre for Water Hazard and Risk Management, ICHARM-UNESCO, Tsukuba 305-8516, Japan. http://www.iwra.org/doc/Tsunami_report_Kuniyoshi_Takeuchi_ICHARM.pdf
Tierney K (2012) Disaster governance: social, political, and economic dimensions. Annu Rev Environ Resour 37:341–363, http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-020911-095618
Tsunami Global Lessons Learned Project (2009) Tsunami legacy. Innovations, breakthroughs and changes. p 105
UNDESA (2002) Johannesburg plan of implementation of the world summit on sustainable development. Division for Sustainable Development, UN Dept. of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, www.un.org/esa/sustdev/documents/WSSD_POI_PD/English/POIToc.htm
UNDP (2013) Issue brief: disaster risk governance. Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery, UNDP. http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/crisis%20prevention/disaster/Issue_brief_disaster_risk_reduction_governance_11012013.pdf
UNEP (2006) After the tsunami, rapid environmental assessment. http://www.unep.org/tsunami/reports/TSUNAMI_report_complete.pdf
UNISDR (2004) Disaster risk reduction, governance and development. Africa Educational Series, Vol 2, Issue 4, December 2004, p 56. http://www.unisdr.org/files/8546_governacedevelopment1.pdf
UNISDR (2005a) Hyogo declaration. World conference on disaster reduction, 18–22 January 2005, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan. www.unisdr.org/wcdr/intergover/official-doc/L-docs/Hyogo-declaration-english.pdf
UNISDR (2005b) Hyogo framework for action 2005–2015: building the resilience of nations and communities to disasters. World Conference on Disaster Reduction, 18–22 January 2005, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan. www.unisdr.org/eng/hfa/
UNISDR (2006) Developing early warning systems: a checklist. Report from the Third International Conference on Early Warning, Geneva
UNISDR (2012) Impacts of disasters since the 1992 Rio de Janeiro earth summit impacts of disasters since the 1992 Rio de Janeiro Earth Summit. http://www.unisdr.org/files/27162_infographic.pdf
United Nations (2010) Local governments and disaster risk reduction: good practices and lessons learned. UNISDR, Geneva
Velásquez A, Rosales C (1999) Escudriñando en los desastres a todas las escalas. Red de Estudios Sociales en Prevención de Desastres en América Latina—LA RED, p 123 (in Spanish)
Winchester P (1992) Power, choice and vulnerability: a case study in disaster management in South India. James & James, London, p 225
Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk: natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, New York, p 471
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the support kindly provided by CONACyT through the research project 156242. Prof. Kuniyoshi Takeuchi (ICHARM, Japan) kindly provided photographs of the Tōhoku Earthquake. Disaster data were kindly provided by and downloaded from the ODFA/CRED International Disaster Database Centre for Research into the Epidemiology of Disasters (CRED), Catholic University of Louvain.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Alcántara-Ayala, I., Oliver-Smith, A. (2017). The Necessity of Early Warning Articulated Systems (EWASs): Critical Issues Beyond Response. In: Sudmeier-Rieux, K., Fernández, M., Penna, I., Jaboyedoff, M., Gaillard, J. (eds) Identifying Emerging Issues in Disaster Risk Reduction, Migration, Climate Change and Sustainable Development. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33880-4_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33880-4_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33878-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33880-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)