Advertisement

A Model for Change: Sharing Ideas and Strategies

  • Ian G. CookEmail author
  • Paresh Wankhade
Chapter
Part of the International Perspectives on Social Policy, Administration, and Practice book series (IPSPAP)

Abstract

The aims of this chapter are, firstly, to examine the context in which the pedagogy of community arises in the UK and elsewhere, briefly summarising the nature of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) and then communities themselves. It becomes readily apparent that these are quite different types of entities in their objectives and structures, but it is in their interaction, no matter how complex and difficult, that change becomes possible. We provide some examples of past good practice before focusing on Kahu’s (Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773, 2013) model of holistic engagement with communities by HEIs. The authors then return to good practice in the current era before concluding with some pointers for the way ahead to a meaningful and productive interrelationship between HEIs and communities.

Keywords

Communities Higher education institutions Good practice Student engagement 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This chapter is based on a presentation to the York HEA seminar on The Pedagogy of Community Development and Engagement in March 2014. The authors would like to thank the organisers Jamie P. Halsall and Mike Snowden and the Higher Education Academy for the opportunity to present their ideas and to the seminar participants for their helpful feedback and comments.

References

  1. Bernal, A., & Ibarrola-García, S. (2014). Learning leadership from teaching: Emotional competences. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education. doi: 10.4995/muse.2014.3265 Social and Technological Sciences. ISSN: 2341-2593. Accessed May 28, 2015.
  2. Bringle, R. G., Games, R., & Malloy, E. A. (1999). Colleges and universities as citizens. Boston: Allynand Bacon.Google Scholar
  3. Bringle, R. G., & Hatcher, J. A. (2002). Campus-community partnerships: The terms of engagement. Journal of Social Issues, 58(3), 503–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2008). An introduction to student engagement. In L. Hand & C. Bryson (Eds.), SEDA special 22: Aspects of student engagement (pp. 5–13). Nottingham: Staff and Educational Development Association.Google Scholar
  5. Christie, H., Tett, L., Cree, V. E., Hounsell, J., & Mccune, V. (2008). ‘A real rollercoaster of confidence and emotions’: Learning to be a university student. Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), 567–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coates, H. (2010). Development of the Australasian Survey of Student Engagement (AUSSE). Higher Education, 60(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cook, I. G., Halsall, J. P., & Wankahde, P. (2015). Sociability, social capital and community development: A public health perspective. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cook, I. G., Hordern, B., McGahan, H., & Ritson, P. (2000). Geography in focus. Ormskirk: Causeway Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cook, I. G., & Norcup, J. (2012). Geographies and urban space. In R. Kinna (Ed.), The continuum companion to anarchism (Chap. 14, pp. 278–298). London, Continuum.Google Scholar
  10. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geyer, F. (2001). Sociology of alienation. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International encyclopaedia of the social and behavioural sciences (pp. 388–392). Oxford: Pergamon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hand, L., & Bryson, C. (2008). Conclusions and implications. In L. Hand & C. Bryson (Eds.), SEDA special 22: Aspects of student engagement (pp. 41–42). Nottingham: Staff and Educational Development Association.Google Scholar
  13. HEFCE. (2015). Retrieved July 13, 2015, from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/lt/nss/results/
  14. Humphrey, N., Curran, A., Morris, E., Farrell, P., & Woods, K. (2007). Emotional intelligence and education: A critical review. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 27(2), 235–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jimerson, S., Campos, E., & Greif, J. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. The California School Psychologist, 8, 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kezar, A., & Kinzie, J. (2006). Examining the ways institutions create student engagement: The role of mission. Journal of College Student Development, 47(2), 149–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuh, G. D. (2009). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Laurillard, D. (2008). The teacher as action researcher: Using technology to capture pedagogic form. Studies in Higher Education, 33(2), 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lear, J., Ansorge, C., & Steckelberg, A. (2010). Interactivity/community process model for the online education environment. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6. http://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no1/lear_0310.htm
  21. Mann, S. (2001). Alternative perspectives on the student experience: Alienation and engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 26(1), 7–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McCauley-Smith, C., Williams, S. J., Gillon, A. C., & Braganza, A. (2014). Making sense of leadership development: Developing a community of education leaders. Studies in Higher Education. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2013.842209.Google Scholar
  23. Neophytou, L. (2013). Emotional intelligence and educational reform. Educational Review, 65(2), 140–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Norton, L. (2009). Action research in teaching and learning: a practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  25. REF. (2015). Retrieved July 13, 2015, from http://www.ref.ac.uk/
  26. Thomas, L. (2002). Student retention in higher education: The role of institutional habitus. Journal of Education Policy, 17(4), 423–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Treleaven, L., Sykes, C., & Ormiston, J. (2012). A dissemination methodology for learning and teaching developments through engaging and embedding. Studies in Higher Education, 37(6), 747–767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Trowler, V., & Trowler, P. (2010). Student engagement evidence summary. York: Higher Education Academy.Google Scholar
  29. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Yorke, M. (2000). The quality of the student experience: What can institutions learn from data relating to non-completion? Quality in Higher Education, 6(1), 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zepke, N. (2010). Improving student engagement: Ten proposals for action. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(3), 167–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Zepke, N. (2011). Understanding teaching, motivation and external influences in student engagement: How can complexity thinking help? Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 16(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Zhao, C., & Kuh, G. (2004). Adding value: Learning communities and student engagement. Research in Higher Education, 45, 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Arts, Professional and Social StudiesLiverpool John Moores UniversityLiverpoolUK
  2. 2.Business School, Edge Hill UniversityOrmskirkUK

Personalised recommendations