Skip to main content

Information Systems Engineering and Knowledge-Based Enterprise Modelling: Towards Foundations of Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Strategic Innovative Marketing

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics ((SPBE))

  • 3854 Accesses

Abstract

The enterprise information systems engineering methodologies do not yet have a theoretical framework. One and only exception is data model design technique which is based on the internal modelling paradigm, because it uses concept of functional dependence in the normalization procedure. A theoretical soundness of knowledge-based approach towards enterprise IS engineering is assured by the use of principles of second-order cybernetics. An enterprise is considered as an entirety of self-managed activities correlated by management functional dependencies. New internal modelling views—a control view and a self-managing view—are included for capturing the management transactions—the key components of the subject domain knowledge. A normalized systems development life cycle is defined as required component of knowledge-based IS development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1971). Towards a system of Systems concepts. Management Sciences, 17(11), 661–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertolazzi, P., Krusich, C., & Missikoff, M. (2001). An approach to the definition of a core enterprise ontology: CEO. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Open Enterprise Solutions: Systems, Experiences, and Organizations (OES-SEO 2001), Rome, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booch, G., Jacobson, I., & Rumbaugh, J. (2000). OMG unified modelling language specification, Version 1.3 (1st ed.) March 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cano, J. J. (2003). Technological frames recursive construction approach: A systemic theory for information technology incorporation in organizations. In Critical reflections on information systems: A systemic approach. IDEA Group publishing, 2003, pp. 31–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Čaplinskas, A. (1996). Software systems engineering basics (Programų sistemų inžinerijos pagrindai) I part, Matematikos ir informatikos institutas. Vilnius: Mokslo aidai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Čaplinskas, A. (1998). Software systems engineering basics (Programų sistemų inžinerijos pagrindai) II part, Matematikos ir informatikos institutas. Vilnius: Mokslo aidai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, S. A. (2010). Design science research in information systems: A Critical realistic approach. In A. Hevner & S. Chatterjee (Eds.), Design research in Information Systems (pp. 209–233). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crowston, K., Rubleske, J., & Howison, J. (2006). Coordination theory: A ten-year retrospective. In P. Zhang and D.Galletta (Eds.), Human computer interaction and management Information Systems: foundations. advances in Management Information Systems, (vol. 5, pp. 120–140). Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, J. L. G. (2003). The atoms, molecules and fibers of organizations. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 47(3), 301–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietz, J. L. G. (2006). Enterprise ontology. Theory and methodology. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenberg, E. D. et. al. (1998). FRISCO—A framework of information system concepts—The FRISCO report. IFIP WG 8.1 Task Group FRISCO. ftp://ftp.leidenuniv.nl/pub/rul/fri-full.zip.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galliers, R. D. (2007). Strategizing for agility: confronting Information Systems Inflexibility in dynamic Environments. In Agile Information Systems: Conceptualization, Construction, and Management, (pp. 1–15) Elsevier Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geerts, G. L., & McCarthy, W. E. (1999). An accounting object infrastructure for knowledge based enterprise models. IEEE Intelligent Systems & Their Application, 14(4), 89–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geerts, G. L., & McCarthy, W. E. (2002). An ontological analysis of the economic primitives of the extended REA enterprise information architecture. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giaglis, G. M., Papakiriakopoulos, D. A., & Doukidis, G. I. (2000). An analytical framework and a development method for inter-organisational business process modelling. International Journal of. Simulation, 2(2), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, D. S., & Hart , D. N.(2005). Information systems foundations: Constructing and criticising (p. 221). ANU E Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudas, S. (1991.1). A framework for research of information processing hierarchy in enterprise. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 33(4): Dec. 1991, North Holland, 281–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudas S. (1991.2). Organizational system as hierarchy of information processes. applications of artificial Intelligence in Engineering. In G. Rzevski, R. Adey (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on artificial Intelligence In engineering (AIENG 91), Oxford, England, Jun, 1991, pp. 1037–1050.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudas, S. (1993). Taxonomy of coordination processes, applications of artificial intelligence in engineering VIII. In G. Rzevski, J.J. Pastor, R. Adey (Eds.), Vol. 1—Design, Methods and Techniques Editors: A Proceedings of the 8th International Conf. on Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering (AIENG 93), (pp. 383–389) Univ. Waterloo, Toulouse, France. ISBN: 1-85312-256-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudas, S. (1994). Hierarchy of information processing in organizational systems. In Proceedings of the Baltic Workshop on national Infrastructure databases: problems, methods, Experiences (Baltic dB’94 Workshop) (vol. 2, pp. 112–120). Vilnius: mokslo aidai.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudas, S. (2012a). Foundations of the information systems’ engineering theory [Lith.] (informacijos sistemų inžinerijos teorijos pagrindai). Vilnius University, Vilnius, 384 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudas, S. (2012b). Knowledge-based enterprise framework: A management control view, new research on knowledge management models and methods (Huei Tse Hou (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51-0190-1, InTech, http://www.intechopen.com/books/new-research-on-knowledge-management-models-and-methods/knowledge-based-enterprise-framework-a-management-control-view.

  • Gudas, S., & Lopata, A. (2016) Towards internal modelling of the information systems application domain. Informatica, 27(1), 1–29. ISSN: 0868-4952

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudas, S., Skersys, T., & Lopata, A. (2004). Framework for knowledge–based IS engineering. In T. Yakhno (ed.), Proceedings of third international conference Advances in Information systems (ADVIS2004), Izmir, Turkey, October 20–22, LNCS 3261, pp. 512–522.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudas, S., Skersys, T., & Lopata, A. (2005). Approach to enterprise modelling for information systems engineering. Informatica 2005, 16(2), 175–192. ISSN 0868-4952.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanseth, O., & Lyytinen, K. (2004). Theorizing about the design of Information Infrastructures: Kernel Theories and principles, case Western reserve University, USA. Sprouts: Working Papers on Information Systems, 2004, 4(12). pp. 207–241, http://sprouts.aisnet.org/4-12, ISSN1535-6078.

  • Henderson, J., & Venkatraman, N. (1990). Strategic alignment: A model for organization transformation via information technology. Working paper 322390. Sloan School of management, MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heylighen, F., & Joslyn, C. (2001). Cybernetics and Second-Order Cybernetics. In: R.A. Meyers (Ed.), Encyclopedia of physical science & technology (3rd ed.). Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. K. (1989). Four paradigms of information systems development. Communications of the ACM, 32(10), 1199–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschheim, M. L., & Klein, H. K. (2003). Crisis in the IS field? A critical reflextion on the state of the discipline. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 4(5), 237–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iivari, J. (2003). Towards Information systems as a science of meta-artefacts, communications of the association of Information Systems, 12(37), November, 2003, 568–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Information Systems Theory. Explaining and predicting our digital society (2012). Vol.1 and Vol.2.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 15704:2000 (2000). Industrial automation systems. Requirements for enterprise-reference architectures and methodologies. https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:15704:ed-1:v1:en.

  • Jacobson, I., & Meyer, B. (2009). Methods need theory, August 06, 2009 http://drdobbs.com/architectureanddesign/219100242 [=i8r4ta 2010-08-28].

  • Jarke, M., & Pohl, K. (1993). Establishing visions in context—towards a model of requirements processes. Proc. 14th Intl. Conf. Information Systems, Orlando, Fl, 1993, 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khazanchi, D., & Munkvold, B. E. (2001). Expanding the notion of relevance in IS research: A proposal and Some recommendations. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 6(14). http://aisel.aisnet.org/cais/vol6/iss1/14.

  • Langefors, B. (1966). Theoretical analysis of information systems. Lund: Studentlitteratur. 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langefors, B. (1987). Distinction between data and information. Knowledge, Information Age, 9(2), 89–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Lamsweerde, A. (2001). Goal-oriented requirements engineering: A guided tour, invited paper for RE’01—5th IEEE Int (pp. 249–263). Toronto, August: Symposium on Requirements Engineering.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapouchnian. A. (2005). Goal-oriented requirements engineering: An overview of the current research. http://www.cs.utoronto.ca/~alexei/pub/Lapouchnian-Depth.pdf.

  • Larsen, K. R., Allen, G., Vance, A., & Eargle, D. (Eds.) (2015). Theories Used in IS Research Wiki. Retrieved Sept 22 2015 from http://IS.TheorizeIt.org.

  • Malone, T. W., & Crowston K. (1990). What is Ccoordination Theory and how can it help design Cooperative Work Systems. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer support cooperative work (CSCW 90). Los Angeles, California, October, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, W. K., Lee, J., & Pentland, B. (1993). Tools for inventing organizations: Toward a handbook of organizational processes. In Proceedings of the 2nd IEEE Workshop on Enabling Technologies Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises. Morgantown, WV, April 20–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mesarovic, M. D., Macko, M., & Takahara, Y. (1970). Theory of hierarchical, multilevel, systems (p. 344). N.Y.: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nabende, P., Ahimbisibwe, B., & Lubega, J. T. (2009). Relationship between Information systems development paradigms and methods. In J. Kizza, K. Lynch, R. Nath, J. Aisbett, & P. Vir (Eds.), Special topics in computing and ICT research: Strengthening the role of ICT in development (pp. 75–84). Uganda: Fountain publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nüttgens, M. (1997). Event-driven process chain (EPK)—Some links and selected publications. http://www.iwi.uni-sb.de/nuettgens/EPK/epk.htm.

  • O’Leary, D. E. (2010). Enterprise ontologies: Review and an activity theory approach. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 11(2010), 336–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, T. (2010). Most popular theories in information systems research. http://www.timolsen.com/2010/01/26/most-popular-theories-in-information-systems-research/.

  • Oxford English Dictionary (OED). (2015). http://www.oed.com/.

  • Rummler, G. A. & Brache, A. P. (1991). Managing the white space in the organization chart. Supervision, 91, 52(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheer, A.-W. (1994). Business process engineering—Reference models for industrial enterprises (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. M., & Smith, D. C. P. (1977). Data base abstractions: Aggregation and generalization. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 2(2), 105–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umpleby, S. (2001). What comes after second order cybernetics?. http://www.gwu.edu/~umpleby/recent_papers/2001_what_comes_after_second_order_cybernetics.htm.

  • Uschold, M., King, M., Stuart, S., & Zorgios Y. (1996). The enterprise ontology March 27, http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.39.4442&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

  • Lopata A., Veitaite, I., Gudas, S., & Butleris, R. (2014). CASE tool component—knowledge-based subsystem. UML Diagrams Generation Process, Transformations in Business & Economics, 13, 2B (32B), 161–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wren, A. D., Bedeian, A. G., & Breeze, J. D. (2002). The foundations of Henri Fayol’s administrative theory. Management Decision, 40(9), 906–918.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saulius Gudas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gudas, S. (2017). Information Systems Engineering and Knowledge-Based Enterprise Modelling: Towards Foundations of Theory. In: Kavoura, A., Sakas, D., Tomaras, P. (eds) Strategic Innovative Marketing. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33865-1_59

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics