Skip to main content

Evidence-Based Toxicology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Validation of Alternative Methods for Toxicity Testing

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 856))

Abstract

Evidence-based toxicology (EBT) was introduced independently by two groups in 2005, in the context of toxicological risk assessment and causation as well as based on parallels between the evaluation of test methods in toxicology and evidence-based assessment of diagnostics tests in medicine. The role model of evidence-based medicine (EBM) motivated both proposals and guided the evolution of EBT, whereas especially systematic reviews and evidence quality assessment attract considerable attention in toxicology.

Regarding test assessment, in the search of solutions for various problems related to validation, such as the imperfectness of the reference standard or the challenge to comprehensively evaluate tests, the field of Diagnostic Test Assessment (DTA) was identified as a potential resource. DTA being an EBM discipline, test method assessment/validation therefore became one of the main drivers spurring the development of EBT.

In the context of pathway-based toxicology, EBT approaches, given their objectivity, transparency and consistency, have been proposed to be used for carrying out a (retrospective) mechanistic validation.

In summary, implementation of more evidence-based approaches may provide the tools necessary to adapt the assessment/validation of toxicological test methods and testing strategies to face the challenges of toxicology in the twenty first century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adriaens E, Barroso J, Eskes C, Hoffmann S, McNamee P, Alépée N, Bessou-Touya S, De Smedt A, De Wever B, Pfannenbecker U, Tailhardat M, Zuang V (2014) Retrospective analysis of the Draize test for serious eye damage/eye irritation: importance of understanding the in vivo endpoints under UN GHS/EU CLP for the development and evaluation of in vitro test methods. Arch Toxicol 88:701–723

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen ME, Al-Zoughool M, Croteau M, Westphal M, Krewski D (2010) The future of toxicity testing. J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev 13:163–196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balls M, Blaauboer B, Brusick D, Frazier J, Lamb D, Pemberton M, Reinhardt C, Roberfroid M, Rosenkranz H, Schmid B, Spielmann H, Stammati AL, Walum E (1990) Report and recommendations of the CAAT/ERGATT workshop on the validation of toxicity test procedures. Altern Lab Anim 18:313–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum LS (2013) 15 years out: reinventing ICCVAM. Environ Health Perspect 121:40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouhifd M, Andersen ME, Baghdikian C, Boekelheide K, Crofton KM, Fornace AJ Jr, Kleensang A, Li H, Livi CB, Maertens A, McMullen PD, Rosenberg M, Thomas R, Vantangoli M, Yager JD, Zhao L, Hartung T (2015) The human toxome project. ALTEX 32:112–124

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bus JS, Becker RA (2009) Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a view from the chemical industry. Toxicol Sci 112:297–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curren RD, Southee JA, Spielmann H, Liebsch M, Fentem JH, Balls M (1995) The role of prevalidation in the development, validation and acceptance of alternative methods. Altern Lab Anim 23:211–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Eddy DM (2005) Evidence-based medicine: a unified approach. Health Aff 24:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) (2010) Application of systematic review methodology to food and feed safety assessments to support decision making. EFSA J 8:1–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Egger M, Smith GD (1997) Meta-analysis: potentials and promise. BMJ 315:1371–1374

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Egger M, Smith GD, Phillips AN (1997) Meta-analysis: principles and procedures. BMJ 315:1533–1537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Eskes C, Hoffmann S, Facchini D, Ulmer R, Wang A, Flego M, Vassallo M, Bufo M, van Vliet E, d’Abrosca F, Wilt N (2014) Validation study on the Ocular Irritection(®) assay for eye irritation testing. Toxicol In Vitro 28:1046–1065

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier JM (1994) The role of mechanistic toxicology in test method validation. Toxicol In Vitro 8:787–791

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fung VA, Barrett JC, Huff J (1995) The carcinogenesis bioassay in perspective: application in identifying human cancer hazards. Environ Health Perspect 103:680–683

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Griesinger C, Guzelian P (2009) Proceedings of the 1st international forum towards evidence-based toxicology. Hum Exp Toxicol 28:71–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzelian PS, Victoroff MS, Halmes NC, Janes RC, Guzelian CP (2005) Evidence-based toxicology: a comprehensive framework for causation. Hum Exp Toxicol 24:161–201

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartung T (2010) Evidence-based toxicology - the toolbox of validation for the 21st century? ALTEX 27:253–263

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartung T, McBride M (2011) Food for thought … on mapping the human toxome. ALTEX 28:83–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartung T, Bremer S, Casati S, Coecke S, Fortaner S, Gribaldo L, Halder M, Hoffmann S, Janusch-Roi A, Prieto P, Sabbioni E, Scott L, Worth A, Zuang V (2004) A modular approach to the ECVAM principles on test validity. Altern Lab Anim 32:467–472

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hartung T, Hoffmann S, Stephens M (2013) Mechanistic validation. ALTEX 30:119–130

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins JPT, Green S (eds) (2008) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Wiley, Chichester (UK)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill AB (1965) The environment and disease: association or causation? Proc R Soc Med 58:295–300

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann S, Hartung T (2005) Diagnosis: toxic! − trying to apply approaches of clinical diagnostics and prevalence in toxicology considerations. Toxicol Sci 85:422–428

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann S, Hartung T (2006) Toward an evidence-based toxicology. Hum Exp Toxicol 25:497–513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann S, Cole T, Hartung T (2005) Skin irritation: prevalence, variability, and regulatory classification of existing in vivo data from industrial chemicals. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 41:159–166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann S, Edler L, Gardner I, Gribaldo L, Hartung T, Klein C, Liebsch M, Sauerland S, Schechtman L, Stammati A, Nikolaidis E (2008a) Points of reference in the validation process. Altern Lab Anim 36:343–352

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann S, Saliner AG, Patlewicz G, Eskes C, Zuang V, Worth AP (2008b) A feasibility study developing an integrated testing strategy assessing skin irritation potential of chemicals. Toxicol Lett 180:9–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath AR, Pewsner D (2004) Systematic reviews in laboratory medicine: principles, processes and practical considerations. Clin Chim Acta 342:23–39

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Judson R, Kavlock R, Martin M, Reif D, Houck K, Knudsen T, Richard A, Tice RR, Whelan M, Xia M, Huang R, Austin C, Daston G, Hartung T, Fowle JR III, Wooge W, Tong W, Dix D (2013) Perspectives on validation of high-throughput assays supporting 21st century toxicity testing. ALTEX 30:51–56

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Krauth D, Woodruff TJ, Bero L (2013) Instruments for assessing risk of bias and other methodological criteria of published animal studies: a systematic review. Environ Health Perspect 121:985–992

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Leist M, Hasiwa M, Daneshian M, Hartung T (2012) Validation and quality control of replacement alternatives – current status and future challenges. Toxicol Res 1:8–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas NP, Macaskill P, Irwig L, Bogduk N (2010) The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL). J Clin Epidemiol 63:854–861

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maxim L, van der Sluijs JP (2014) Qualichem in vivo: a tool for assessing the quality of in vivo studies and its application for bisphenol A. PLoS One 9:e87738

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council) (2007) Toxicity testing in the 21st century: a vision and a strategy. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council) (2014) Review of EPA’s Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) process. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2005) Guidance document on the validation and international acceptance of new or updated test methods for hazard identification. 1-96. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. Environmental Health and Safety Monograph Series on Testing and Assessment No. 34

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma JB, Rutjes AWS, Khan KS, Coomarasamy A, Bossuyt PM (2009) A review of solutions for diagnostic accuracy studies with an imperfect or missing reference standard. J Clin Epidemiol 62:797–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rooney AA, Boyles AL, Wolfe MS, Bucher JR, Thayer KA (2014) Systematic review and evidence integration for literature-based environmental health science assessments. Environ Health Perspect 122:711–718

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312:71–72

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider K, Schwarz M, Burkholder I, Kopp-Schneider A, Edler L, Kinsner-Ovaskainen A, Hartung T, Hoffmann S (2009) "ToxRTool", a new tool to assess the reliability of toxicological data. Toxicol Lett 189:138–144

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens ML, Andersen M, Becker RA, Betts K, Boekelheide K, Carney E, Chapin R, Devlin D, Fitzpatrick S, Fowle JR III, Harlow P, Hartung T, Hoffmann S, Holsapple M, Jacobs A, Judson R, Naidenko O, Pastoor T, Patlewicz G, Rowan A, Scherer R, Shaikh R, Simon T, Wolf D, Zurlo J (2013) Evidence-based toxicology for the 21st century: opportunities and challenges. ALTEX 30:74–103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MM, Sterne JA, Bossuyt PM, QUADAS-2 Group (2011) QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med 155:529–536

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Hoffmann .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hoffmann, S., Hartung, T., Stephens, M. (2016). Evidence-Based Toxicology. In: Eskes, C., Whelan, M. (eds) Validation of Alternative Methods for Toxicity Testing. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 856. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33826-2_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics