Skip to main content

Inferring Complex Geographical Concepts with Implicit Geometries Using Ontologies: A Case of Peninsulas

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Geospatial Data in a Changing World

Abstract

Ontology-driven concept inference has the merit of high flexibility and transparency. Users can composite and reuse atomic primitive concepts and relationship to interpret complex geographical concept without the need to retouch or even know the technical details. The major issue that we are focusing on is the implicit geometry problem. That is, the geometries corresponding to some primitive concept defining the complex geographic concept are missing or not fully represented in a spatial database, making it impossible to inferring the high-level semantics of the objects. This paper combines terminological/assertional inference (for general logic reasoning) and spatial operations (for making implicit geometries explicit), therefore enabling an ontology-driven inference of complex concepts that can handle cases where some concept has no explicit geometries. In the end, the concept of peninsula is used to demonstrate the proposed methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-guide/.

  2. 2.

    http://clarkparsia.com/pellet/.

  3. 3.

    http://owlapi.sourceforge.net/.

  4. 4.

    http://protege.stanford.edu/.

  5. 5.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_peninsulas.

  6. 6.

    http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/urw3/XGR-urw3-20080331/.

References

  • Ai T (2006) A spatial field representation model based on Delaunay triangulation. Acta Geodaetica Cartogr Sin 35(1):71–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Ai T, Zhou Q, Zhang X, Huang Y, Zhou M (2014) A simplification of Ria coastline with geomorphologic characteristics preserved. Mar Geodesy 37:167–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baader F, Calvanese D, McGuinness DL, Nardi D, Patel-Schneider PF (2003) The description logic handbook: theory, implementation and applications. Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett B, Mallenby D, Third A (2008) An ontology for grounding vague geographic terms. In: Eschenbach C, Grüninger M, (eds) Formal ontology in information systems—Proceedings of the fifth international conference. FOIS-08, Saarbrücken, Germany, pp 280–293

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho RN, Laskey KB, Costa PCG (2010) PR-OWL 2.0—Bridging the gap to OWL semantics. In: Proceedings of the 9th international semantic web conference, Shanghai, China, p 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Christophe S, Ruas A (2002) Detecting building alignments for generalisation purposes. In: Richardson DE, van Oosterom P (eds) Advances in spatial data handling (10th international symposium on spatial data handling), Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, New York, pp 419–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Haarslev V, Möller R, Schröder C (1994) Combining spatial and terminological reasoning. In: Nebel B, Dreschler-Fischer L (eds) Advances in artificial intelligence, proceedings of the 18th German annual conference on artificial intelligence, LNAI 861, pp 142–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Haarslev V, Lutz G, Möller R (1998) Foundations of spatioterminological reasoning with description logics. In: Cohn A, Schubert L, Shapiro S (eds.) Principles of knowledge representation and reasoning, proceedings of the sixth international conference (KR’98), pp 112–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Haarslev V, Pai H, Shiri N (2006) Uncertainty reasoning in description logics: a generic approach. In: Proceedings of the 19th international FLAIRS conference. AAAI Press, pp 818–823

    Google Scholar 

  • Klien E (2007) A rule-based strategy for the semantic annotation of geodata. Trans GIS 11(3):437–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn W (2005) Geospatial semantics: why, of what, and how? J Data Semant III, LNCS 3534:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüscher P, Burghardt D, Weibel R (2007) Ontology-driven enrichment of spatial databases. In: The 10th ICA workshop on generalisation and multiple representation, Moscow

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüscher P, Weibel R, Mackaness W (2008) Where is the terraced house? On the use of ontologies for recognition of urban concepts in cartographic databases. In: Proceedings 13th international symposium on spatial data handling, pp 449–466

    Google Scholar 

  • Möller R, Neumann B (2008) Ontology-based reasoning techniques for multimedia interpretation and retrieval. In: Kompatsiaris Y, Hobson P (eds) Semantic multimedia and ontologies, pp 55–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Neun M, Burghardt D, Weibel R (2008) Web service approaches for providing enriched data structures to generalization operators. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 22(2):133–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regnauld N (1996) Recognition of building clusters for generalization. In: Kraak M-J, Molenaar M (eds) Advances in GIS research II: proceedings of the seventh international symposium on spatial data handling. Taylor & Francis, London, 4B, pp 1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Sester M (2000) Knowledge acquisition for the automatic interpretation of spatial data. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 14(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiniger S, Lange T, Burghardt D, Weibel R (2008) An approach for the classification of urban building structures based on discriminate analysis techniques. Trans GIS 12(1):31–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson MK, Béra R (2007) Relating land use to the landscape character: toward an ontological inference tool. In: Proceedings GIS research UK 15th annual conference (GISRUK-2007), Maynooth, Ireland

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson MK, Béra R (2008) A methodology for inferring higher level semantic information from spatial databases. In: Proceedings of the GIS research UK 16th annual conference (GISRUK 2008), Manchester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Ai T, Stoter J (2008) The evaluation of spatial distribution density in map generalization. In: International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences (ISPRS Congress 2008), vol XXXVII. Part B2, Beijing, pp 181–188

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank the three anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. The work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 41301410 and No. 41531180) and the National High Technology Research and Development Program of China (Grant No. 2015AA1239012).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang Zhang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zhang, X., Ai, T., Stoter, J. (2016). Inferring Complex Geographical Concepts with Implicit Geometries Using Ontologies: A Case of Peninsulas. In: Sarjakoski, T., Santos, M., Sarjakoski, L. (eds) Geospatial Data in a Changing World. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33783-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics