Advertisement

Complexification in the Energiewende

  • Franco RuzzenentiEmail author
  • Brian D. Fath
Chapter
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

The path toward a low-carbon economy takes three main parallel roads: the efficiency of energy conversion, the reduction of energy use and the substitution of fossil-fuels with renewable energy. This chapter will focus mainly on this latter aspect of the problem by analyzing how a transition toward renewable energy can pose a new challenge to economy and governance in terms of complexification of the system. The fate of renewable energy sources (RES) crucially depends on the power sector for electricity is still the main vector for renewable energy. The main features of the ongoing transition toward a renewable energy system are: (1) lower intensity of energy sources; (2) high efficiency of conversion; (3) temporal discontinuity; (4) free access to local and more decentralized energy sources; (5) dramatic change in the economic concept of energy scarcity; (6) new, leading role of the network. Is this process leading to a higher complexification? To answer to this question, we will analyze this energy transition in the light of the concept of complexity and sustainability by looking at the history of economic development and societal change prompted by new energy sources and new form of energy conversions. A particular emphasis will be given to the case study of Germany and recent thrust toward an energiewende. Finally, it will be advocated the need for a new market of power aimed at decoupling the sites of electricity inlet and outlet overcoming the impending limits of RES energy that curbs their development.

Keywords

Energy Transition Renewable Energy Source Industrial Revolution Demand Side Management Outlet Point 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ayres, R.B., L.W. Ayres, and B. Warr. 2003. Exergy, power and work in the US economy, 1900–1998. Energy 28:219–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bloomberg. 2015. New energy outlook (NEO). Available at: http://www.bloomberg.com/company/new-energy-outlook/.
  3. Braudel, F. 1995. A history of civilizations. Harmondsworth, Middlesex, England: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  4. Carrington, D. 2016. From liquid air to super capacitors, energy storage is finally poised for a breakthrough. The Guardian, February 4, 2016.Google Scholar
  5. Fath, B.D., and B.C. Patten. 1999. Review of the foundations of network environ analysis. Ecosystems 2 (2):167–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gualzeri, V. 2013. Rinnovabili, uno studio assolve i costi: “Alla fine ci guadagniamo quasi 50 miliardi”. La Repubblica, April 18, 2013.Google Scholar
  7. Hake, J., W. Fischer, S. Venghaus, and C. Weckenbrock. 2015. The German Energiewende—History and status quo. Energy, Part 3 92: 532–546.Google Scholar
  8. IEA. 2015. Energy statistics of OECD countries. http://data.iea.org.
  9. Jevons, S. 1965. The coal question—An inquiry concerning the progress of the nation, and the probable exhaustion of our coal-mines. Augustus M. Kelley Publisher: New York, 1965. First edition: 1865.Google Scholar
  10. Landes, D.S. 1969. The unbound Prometheus: Technological change and industrial development in Western Europe from 1750 to the present. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Moreno-Cruz, J., and M.S. Taylor. 2014. A spatial approach to energy economics: Theory, measurement and empirics. CESifo Working Paper Series 4845, CESifo Group Munich.Google Scholar
  12. Morris, C., and M. Pehnt. 2015. Energy transition: The German Energiewende. Heinrich Böll Stiftung. http://energytransition.de/.
  13. Nunn, N., and N. Qian. 2011. The Potato’s contribution to population and urbanization: Evidence from a historical experiment. Quarterly Journal of Economics 126:593–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Odum, H.T. 1995. Self-organization and maximum empower. In Maximum power: The ideas and applications of H.T. Odum, ed. Hall, C.A.S. Colorado: Colorado University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Oltvai, Z.N., and A.L. Barabási. 2002. Life’s complexity pyramid. Science 298 (5594):763–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Raugei, M., and E. Leccisi. 2016. A comprehensive assessment of the energy performance of the full range of electricity generation technologies deployed in the United Kingdom. Energy Policy 90:46–59.Google Scholar
  17. Ruzzenenti, F. 2015. Series of papers on changes in the relationship between the financial and the real sector and the present financial and economic crisis: The energy market. FESSUD Working Paper Series No 105. Available at: http://fessud.eu/working-paper/.
  18. Ruzzenenti, F., D. Garlaschelli, and R. Basosi. 2010. Complex networks and symmetry II: Reciprocity and evolution of world trade. Symmetry 2 (3):1710–1744.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Schlör, H., W. Fischer, and J.F. Hake. 2012. The meaning of energy systems for the genesis of the concept of sustainable development. Applied Energy 97:192–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Smil, V. 1994. Energy in world history. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
  21. Smil, V. 2008. Energy in nature and society: General energetics of complex systems. MIT press.Google Scholar
  22. The Economist. 2015. When the wind blows, November 28, vol. 417, no. 8966.Google Scholar
  23. West, G.B., J.H. Brown, and B.J. Enquist. 1997. A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science 276 (5309):122–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management and Quantitative SciencesParthenope University of NaplesNaplesItaly
  2. 2.Institute of SociologyJagiellonian UniversityKrakowPoland
  3. 3.Towson UniversityBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations