Abstract
The future of philosophy is the philosophy of technology. It is argued that, using Wilfrid Sellars’ aim for philosophy as “seeing how things in the broadest possible sense hang together in the broadest possible sense”, contemporary philosophy is nothing more than a fragmented set of abstract and irrelevant activities. Philosophy, it is suggested should be about mankind interacting with the world, which is, on my account, the nature of technology. The role of philosophy should be to help us accomplish those interactions in a thoughtful and productive manner. The philosopher should be seen as part of a team of individuals seeking to accomplish something – she is a critical facilitator – Socrates reborn. To make philosophy a useful feature of the contemporary intellectual scene, we must disengage from minor analytic exercises that have little or no bearing on one another or the world and try to understand mankind interacting with the world, which would be to do philosophy of technology. To accomplish this goal I suggest that we reject the traditional taxonomy we appeal to when trying to make sense of philosophy. Instead of the old division of the field into Epistemology, Metaphysics, Value Theory, History of Philosophy, and Logic and Philosophy of Science, I urge that we first see the aim of philosophy to be assisting humankind to make their way in the world. The point is successful action. The traditional areas of philosophy and numerous subfields that don’t fit easily into the traditional taxonomy such as aesthetics, philosophy of law and philosophy of technology, are now seen as areas to appeal for assistance in achieving the proposed goal. Every area of philosophical interest should be appealed to as a tool, not as a specialized area of “research”.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
It has been brought to my attention that some believe that the flash of insight the master ape had was the result of the aliens who planted the monolith; that the aliens in effect put that idea in his head. Needless to say, there is a lot of disagreement over how to interpret that film. Whether or not aliens helped, the key point is that the film’s portrayal of early human behavior and the almost immediate clash with the future serves as a fruitful presentation of a powerful idea.
- 2.
The real point here is move ethics away from an actor-centered perspective to a group-centered perspective. The actor-centered views such as utilitarianism and deontology rarely if ever have anything to do with how we act. If anything, they are employed in a casuistic manner, after the fact.
References
Kroes, P., & Meijers, A. (Eds.). (2000). The empirical turn in the philosophy of technology. Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.
Pitt, J. C. (2000). Thinking about technology: Philosophical foundations of the philosophy of technology. New York: Seven Bridges Press. http://www.phil.vt.edu/Pitt/jpitt.html
Pitt, J. C. (2005). Hume and Peirce on belief, or, why belief should not be an epistemic category. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, XLI(2), 343–354.
Sellars, W. (1963). Philosophy and the scientific image of man. In Science, perception and reality (Chapter 1, pp. 1–28). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pitt, J.C. (2016). The Future of Philosophy: A Manifesto. In: Franssen, M., Vermaas, P., Kroes, P., Meijers, A. (eds) Philosophy of Technology after the Empirical Turn. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 23. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33717-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33717-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33716-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33717-3
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)