Abstract
In 1959, independent reports were released by the Carnegie Foundation and the Ford Foundation evaluating business schools in the USA. Both reports were scathing in their criticisms of the status quo. There was a glaring lack of scholarship and research on the part of business school faculty. Academic rigor in undergraduate business programs lagged behind other university degree programs. Less than half of business school faculty members held earned doctorates.
University administrators were embarrassed by these reports, and they moved to correct the problems. Rigor was increased in academic programs. New doctoral-qualified faculty members with both training and interest in research were hired. However, these new faculty members were no longer hired based on business experience; they were hired based on their ability to participate in newly-developing academic guilds, not business guilds.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bloom, A. (1987). The closing of the American mind: How higher education has failed democracy and impoverished the souls of today’s students. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
Bok, D. (1986). Higher learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bossard, J. H., & Dewhurst, J. F. (1931). University education for business: A study of existing needs and practices. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Collini, S. (2012). What are universities for? London: Penguin Books.
Daniel, C. A. (1998). MBA: The first century. Lewisburg, PA: Bucknell University Press.
Gordon, R. A., & Howell, J. H. (1959). Higher education for business. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Hambrick, D. C. (1994). What if the academy actually mattered? Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 11–16.
Kerr, C. (1963/2001). The uses of the university. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Khurana, R., & Penrice, D. (2011). Business education: The American trajectory. In M. Morsing & A. S. Rovira (Eds.), Business schools and their contribution to society. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Khurana, R., & Spender, J. C. (2012). Herbert A. Simon on what ails business schools: More than ‘A problem in organizational design’. Journal of Management Studies, 49(3), 619–639.
Kroos, H. E., & Drucker, P. F. (1969). How we got here: Fifty years of structural changes in the business system and the business school. In P. F. Drucker (Ed.), Preparing tomorrow’s business leaders today. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Macdonald, S. (2015). Emperor’s new clothes: The reinvention of peer review as myth. Journal of Management Inquiry, 24(3), 264–289.
Marshall, L. C. (1928). The collegiate school of business: Its status at the close of the first quarter of the twentieth century. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Mintzberg, H. (2004). Managers not MBAs: A hard look at the soft practice of managing and management development. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
Pfeffer, J., & Fong, C. T. (2002). The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1(1), 78–95.
Pierson, F. C. (1959). The education of American businessmen: A study of university-college programs in business administration. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Porter, L. W., & McKibbin, L. E. (1988). Management education and development: Drift or thrust into the 21st century? New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Smith, A. (1776). Wealth of nations, Book I. London: Methuen & Company.
Starkey, K., & Tiratsoo, N. (2007). The business school and the bottom line. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wittrock, B. (1993). The modern university: The three transformations. In S. Rothblatt & B. Wittrock (Eds.), The European and American university since 1800. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miles, E.W. (2016). Critical Juncture III: The 1959 Foundation Reports—Throwing Out the Baby with the Bath Water?. In: The Past, Present, and Future of the Business School. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33639-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33639-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33638-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33639-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)