Abstract
Some universities have prestige. Many more aspire to have prestige. However, prestigious schools generally have huge endowments. It is difficult for schools with minimal endowments to compete with those who have $30 billion. Therefore, three general strategies are common to achieve prestige among those aspirants. First, schools can increase their number of students, thereby increasing funds from tuition and—for state supported schools—state allocations. Second, schools can build revenues by securing government grants. However, about 90 % of government grants go to medicine, science, and engineering. Business schools are not positioned to compete for many grants unless they can link to these disciplines. A third general strategy is to build prestige through high-profile athletic teams. Business schools engage in some activities that seem strikingly like athletic department strategies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bok, D. (1986). Higher learning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bok, D. (2003). Universities in the marketplace: The commercialization of higher education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Breault, D. A., & Callejo PĂ©rez, D. M. (2012). The red light in the ivory tower: Contexts and implications of entrepreneurial education. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Brewer, D. J., Gates, S. M., & Goldman, C. A. (2002). In pursuit of prestige: Strategy and competition in U.S. higher education. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Books.
Center for Measuring University Performance. (2014). Accessed March 4, 2016, from http://mup.asu.edu/research_data.html
Collini, S. (2012). What are universities for? London: Penguin Books.
Deford, F. (2005). America’s modern peculiar institution. In R. H. Hersh & J. Merrow (Eds.), Declining by degrees: Higher education at risk. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Footlick, J. K. (1997). Truth and consequences: How colleges and universities meet public crises. Phoenix, AZ: American Council on Education and Oryx Press.
Hambrick, D. C. (1994). What if the academy actually mattered? Academy of Management Review, 19(1), 11–16.
Institute of Educational Sciences. (2013). Accessed February 1, 2016, from http://www.statisticbrain.com/college-endowment-rankings/
Kerr, C. (1963/2001). The uses of the university. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Kerr, C. (1991b). The new race to be Harvard or Berkeley or Stanford. Change, 23(3), 8–15.
Kirp, D. L. (2003). Shakespeare, Einstein, and the bottom line: The marketing of higher education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McCormick, A. C., & Zhao, C. (2005, September/October). Rethinking and reframing the Carnegie classification. Change, 51–57.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2011). Digest of educational statistics: Table 196, Table 286, and Table 370. Accessed November 18, 2015, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d12/tables/dt12_310.asp
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2012). Digest of educational statistics: Table 333.10. Accessed February 1, 2016, from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/2012menu_tables.asp
National Science Foundation. (2013). Federal spending on research by field. Accessed January 8, 2016, from http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/c4/c4s6.htm#s3
Solomon, R., & Solomon, J. (1993). Up the university: Re-creating higher education in America. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Sperber, M. (2000). Beer and circus: How big-time sports is crippling undergraduate education. New York, NY: Henry Holt and Company.
Sperber, M. (2005). How undergraduate education became college lite—and a personal apology. In R. H. Hersh & J. Merrow (Eds.), Declining by degrees: Higher education at risk. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sutton, W. (1976). Where the money was: The memoirs of a bank robber. New York, NY: Viking Press.
Thelin, J. R. (2011). A history of American higher education (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Trow, M. (1972). The expansion and transformation of higher education. International Review of Education, 18(1), 61–84.
Trow, M. (1983). Reorganizing the biological sciences at Berkeley. Change, 18(8), 28, 44–53.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Miles, E.W. (2016). Prestige and Prestige-Seeking in Universities. In: The Past, Present, and Future of the Business School. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33639-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33639-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33638-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33639-8
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)