Skip to main content

Medical Imaging Informatics in Nuclear Medicine

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Medical imaging informatics is gaining importance in medicine both in clinical practice and in scientific research. Besides radiology, nuclear medicine is also a major stakeholder in medical imaging informatics because of the variety of available imaging modalities and the imaging-oriented operation of this specialization. The amount of data produced by imaging modalities and other diagnostic devices per exam is growing steadily together with the number of exams performed, resulting in a data explosion that provides major opportunities for data analytics and data mining in big data projects. However, it can also fuse problems in storage, distribution, review, and interpretation of the enormous amounts of clinical (image) data while maintaining high-quality patient care. To tackle these problems, standardization, structuring, and automation are crucial. As one of the major producers of medical imaging data, nuclear medicine should stay at the forefront of these developments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Als C, Bischof Delaloye A. Clinical quality management in telenuclear medicine. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:1727–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bakhshi-Raiez F, de Keizer NF, Cornet R, Dorrepaal M, Dongelmans D, Jaspers MWM. A usability evaluation of a SNOMED CT based compositional interface terminology for intensive care. Int J Med Inform. 2012;81:351–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barbaras L, Tal I, Palmer MR, Parker JA, Kolodny GM. Shareware program for nuclear medicine and PET/CT PACS display and processing. AJR. 2007;188:W565–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa F, Maciel LMZ, Vieira EM, De Azevedo Marques PM, Elias J, Muglia VF. Radiological reports: a comparison between the transmission efficiency of information in free text and in structured reports. Clinics. 2010;65(1):15–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Bazak N, Stamm G, Caldarone F, Lotz J, Leppert A, Galanski M. PACS workstations 2000: evaluation, usability and performance. 18th international EuroPACS conference. Graz; 2000. p. 133–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bian J, Topaloglu U, Lane C. EIR: enterprise imaging repository, an alternative imaging archiving and communication system. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:2168–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boehm T, Handgraetinger O, Link J, Ploner R, Voellmy DR, Marincek B, et al. Evaluation of radiological workstations and web-browser-based image distribution clients for a PACS project in hands-on workshops. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:908–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bosmans JML, Weyler JJ, De Schepper AM, Parizal PM. The radiology report as seen by radiologists and referring clinicians: results of the COVER and ROVER surveys. Radiology. 2011;259(1):184–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kail S, Laskey WK, Pennell DJ, Rumberger JA, Ryan T, Verani MS. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002;105:539–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chan J, Shojania KG, Easty AC, Etchells EE. Usability evaluation of order sets in a computerised provider order entry system. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011;20:932–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cockton G, Lavery D, Woolrych A. Inspection-based evaluations. In: Jacko JA, Sears A, editors. The human-computer interaction handbook. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2003. p. 1119–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connectathon Results Browser. http://connectathon-results.ihe.net. Accessed 19 Nov 2013.

  • Do BH, Wu AS, Maley J, Biswal S. Automatic retrieval of bone fracture knowledge using natural language processing. J Digit Imaging. 2013;26(4):709–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Esuli A, Marcheggiani D, Sebastiani F. An enhanced CRFs-based system for information extraction from radiology reports. J Biomed Inform. 2013;46(3):425–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ezquerra N, Mullick R, David Cooke C, Krawczynska EG, Garcia EV. PERFEX: an expert system for interpreting 3D myocardial perfusion. Expert Syst Appl. 1993;6(4):459–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraguchi D, Kim J, Kumar A, Constantinescu L, Wen L, Fang DD. A web-based image viewer for multiple PET-CT follow-up studies. 2011. 22nd annual international conference of the IEEE EMBS. Boston. August 30–September 3, 2011:5279–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindel R. Implementation of the DICOM 3.0 standard – a pragmatic handbook. 1994. Radiological Society of North America, Oak Brook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J-Y, Kao P-F, Chen Y-S. A set of image processing algorithms for computer-aided diagnosis in nuclear medicine whole body bone scan images. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2007;54(3):514–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IHE Wiki – Nuclear Medicine Image. 2013. http://wiki.ihe.net/index.php?title = Nuclear_Medicine_Image. Accessed 22 August 2013, Page last modified at August 31, 2011.

  • Im KC, Choi IS, Ryu J-S, Eo GS, Kim JS, Moon DH. PET/CT fusion viewing software for use with picture archiving and communication systems. J Digit Imaging. 2010;23(6):732–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • ISO 9241-11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) -- Part 11: Guidance on usability. 1998. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers MWM. A comparison of usability methods for testing interactive health technologies: methodological aspects and empirical evidence. Int J Med Inform. 2009;78:340–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers MWM, Smeulers M, Vermeulen H, Peute LW. Effects of clinical decision-support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a synthesis of high-quality systematic review findings. JAMIA. 2011;18(3):327–34.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AJ, Chen MYM, Swan JS, Applegate KE, Littenberg B. Cohort study of structured reporting compared with conventional dictation. Radiology. 2009;253(1):74–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jorritsma W, Cnossen F, van Ooijen PM. Merits of usability testing for PACS selection. Int J Med Inform. 2014;83:27–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawamoto K, Houlihan CA, Balas EA, Lobach DF. Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success. BMJ. 2005;330:765.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Lemke HU. Short history of PACS (part II: Europe). Eur J Radiol. 2011;78:177–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Li Q, Yu X, Conti PS, Leahy RM. Lesion detection in dynamic FDG-PET using matched subspace detection. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2009;28(2):230–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Menon A, Korner-Bitensky N, Chignell M, Straus S. Usability testing of two e-learning resources: Methods to maximize potential for clinician use. J Rehab Med. 2012;44:338–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie Y, Li Q, Li F, Pu Y, Appelbaum D, Doi K. Integrating PET and CT information to improve diagnostic accuracy for lung nodules: a semiautomatic computer-aided method. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(7):1075–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker JA, Royal HD, Uren RF, et al. An all-digital nuclear medicine department. J Digital Imaging. 1983;16(1):5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker JA, Wallis JW, Jadvar H, Christian P, Todd-Pokropek A. Procedure guideline for telenuclear medicine 1.0. J Nucl Med. 2002;43(10):1410–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pelanek GA. A DICOM cardiology exchange. In: Kennedy TE, Nissen SE, Simon R, Thomas JD, Tilkemeier PL, editors. Digital cardiac imaging in the 21st century: a primer. Bethesda: Cardiac and Vascular Information Working Group; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao VM, Levin DC, Parker L, Cavanaugh B, Frangos AJ, Sunshine JH. How widely is computer-aided detection used in screening and diagnostic mammography? J Am Coll Radiol. 2010;7(10):802–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reiner BI. The challenges, opportunities, and imperative of structured reporting in medical imaging. J Digit Imaging. 2009;22(6):562–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sadik M, Suurkula M, Höglund P, Järund A, Edenbrandt L. Improved classifications of planar whole-body bone scans using a computer-assisted diagnosis system: a multicenter, multiple-reader, multiple-case study. J Nucl Med. 2009;50(3):368–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sattler B, Lee JA, Lonsdale M, Coche E. PET/CT (and CT) instrumentation, image reconstruction and data transfer for radiotherapy planning. Radiother Oncol. 2010;96:288–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz L, Panicek D, Berk A, Li Y, Hricak H. Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting. Radiology. 2011;260(1):174–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shiraishi J, Li Q, Appelbaum D, Pu Y, Doi K. Development of a computer-aided diagnostic scheme for detection of interval changes in successive whole-body bone scans. Med Phys. 2007;34(1):25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Somer EJ. PACS man: questioning nuclear medicine and PET integration. Nucl Med Commun. 2006;27:601–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tägil K, Bondouy M, Chaborel JP, et al. A decision support system improves the interpretation of myocardial perfusion imaging. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35(9):1602–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Todd-Pokropek A, Cradduck TD, Deconinck F. A file format for the exchange of nuclear medicine image data: a specification of Interfile version 3.3. Nucl Med Comm. 1992;13(9):673–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel WV, Oyen WJG, van Dalen JA, Huisman H, Karssemeijer N. Sliced alternating DICOM series: convenient visualization of image fusion on PACS. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32(2):247–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis JW. Nuclear PACS: problems, solutions. Decis Imaging Econ. 2004;6:21–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallis JW. PET/CT image fusion headed for PACS. Decisions in imaging economics. Allied Media LLC: Kansas, USA; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang S, Pavlicek W, Roberts CC, Langer SG, Zhang M, Hu M, Morin RL, Schueler BA, Wellnitz CV, Wu T. An automated DICOM database capable of arbitrary data mining (including radiation dose indicators) for quality monitoring. J Digit Imaging. 2011;24(2):223–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zemariame N, Knight N, Siegel EL. Redesigning the nuclear medicine reading room. Semin Nucl Med. 2011;41:463–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman SL, Kim W, William W. Automated structured reporting of imaging findings using the AIM standard and XML. RadioGraphics. 2011;31:881–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter M. A. van Ooijen MSc, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van Ooijen, P.M.A., Jorritsma, W. (2017). Medical Imaging Informatics in Nuclear Medicine. In: Glaudemans, A., Medema, J., van Zanten, A., Dierckx, R., Ahaus, C. (eds) Quality in Nuclear Medicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33531-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33531-5_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33529-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33531-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics