Skip to main content

Splashing: The Iterative Development of a Novel Type of Personal Washing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter describes a case study on personal washing that was developed in association with two subsequent Living Lab projects. Drawing on theories of practice, the case study explored the application of a practices-oriented approach to reducing household resource consumption. Personal washing was taken as a target practice because of its high and growing water and energy consumption. The case study used an iterative process to develop a feasible, but highly less resource intensive alternative to the dominant practice of showering in the Netherlands. Splashing emerged as a promising proto-practice from subsequent performances, both in the lab and the field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The FP7 LivingLab project and the SusLabNWE project related to a PhD research conducted at the Department of Industral Design at Delft University of Technology.

  2. 2.

    http://ec.europa.eu/energy/en/topics/energy-efficiency.

  3. 3.

    It has to be noted that the environmental impact of a shower derives primarily from the energy required to heat the water, but in this study the amount of water is used as a proxy for the combined resource use of water and energy to heat the water.

  4. 4.

    This is an estimation assuming a daily flannel wash using the 5 l ‘lampet’ (jug and basin) and a weekly bath of 50 l.

  5. 5.

    Notably the work of Schatzki (1996), Schatzki et al. (2001), Reckwitz (2002a, b) and Shove et al. (Ingram et al. 2007; Shove et al. 2007, 2012; Shove and Watson 2006).

References

  • Bakker, C., van Eijk, D., Silvester, S., Reitenbach, M., de Jong, A., & Keyson, D. (2010). Understanding and modelling user behaviour in relation to sustainable innovations: The LIVING LAB method. Ancona, Italy: Paper presented at the TMCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, R., & Bushman, C. (1988). The early history of cleanliness in America. Journal of American History, 74(4), 1213–1238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chopp, C. (2012). A bucket a day, keeps the dirt away: A guide to bucket baths. Full Stop India, Tips and Advise From a Western Traveler, 2012. http://www.fullstopindia.com/a-bucket-a-day-keeps-the-dirt-away-a-guide-to-bucket-baths.

  • Correlje, A., & Verbong, G. (2004). The transition from coal to gas: radical change of the Dutch gas system. System innovation and the transition to sustainability: theory, evidence and policy (pp. 114–134). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foekema, H., & van Thiel, L. (2011). Watergebruik thuis 2010. Amsterdam: TNS NIPO, in opdracht van VEWIN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henny, F. (2013). Implementation of a new bathing practice. (Master). Delft: Delft University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hand, M., Shove, E., & Southerton, D. (2005). Explaining showering: A discussion of the material, conventional, and temporal dimensions of practice. Sociological Research Online, 10(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, J., Shove, E., & Watson, M. (2007). Products and practices: Selected concepts from science and technology studies and from social theories of consumption and practice. Design Issues, 23(2), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karakat, H. (2009). Designing for alternative (sustainable) bathing practices. (MSc). Delft: Delft University of Technology. Retrieved from http://repository.tudelft.nl/view/ir/uuid:bda7a61d-2a45-4bd7-9979-25fc611ce55d/.

  • Kira, A. (1976). The bathroom. New York: Viking press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knupfer, L. (2011). An alternative bathing practice for sustainable renovation. (MSc thesis). Delft: Delft University of Technology. Retrieved from http://repository.tudelft.nl/view/ir/uuid%3Ab9db7836-66b2-4745-bdab-c3aef0f1a2dd/.

  • Kuijer, L. (2014). Implications of Social Practice Theory for Sustainable Design.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuijer, L., & Bakker, C. (2015). Of chalk and cheese: behaviour change and practice theory in sustainable design. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering (ahead-of-print), 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuijer, L., de Jong, A., & Van Eijk, D. (2013). Practices as a unit of design: An exploration of theoretical guidelines in a study on bathing. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20(4), 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuijer, L., & de Jong, A. (2009). A practice oriented approach to user centred sustainable design. In Paper presented at the Sixth International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing Sapporo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuijer, L., McHardy, J., & Scott, K. (2010). The challenge of the bucket wash: creating desirable sustainable practices. In Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Design and Emotion, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuhashi, N., Kuijer, L., & de Jong, A. (2009). A culture-inspired approach to gaining insights for designing sustainable practices. In Paper presented at the EcoDesign 2009: Sixth International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing Sapporo, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moel, P. J., Verberk, J. Q., & Van Dijk, J. (2006). Drinking water: principles and practices. Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, A. (2002a). The status of the “material” in theories of culture: From “social structure” to “artefacts”. Journal for the Theory of Social B, 32(2), 195–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reckwitz, A. (2002b). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. doi:10.1177/136843102222225432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohles, H. (1980). Temperature or temperament: A psychologist looks at thermal comfort. ASHRAE Transactions, 86(1), 5–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. (1996). Social practices: A wittgensteinian aproach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T., Cetina, C. K., & von Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K., Quist, J., & Bakker, C. (2009). Co-design, social practices and sustainable innovation: involving users in a living lab exploratory study on bathing. Aalborg, Denmark: Paper presented at the joint actions on climate change conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E., & Watson, M. (2006). Manifesto of practice oriented product design. http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/projects/dnc/papers.html. Retrieved 06 Aug 2008.

  • Shove, E., Watson, M., Hand, M., & Ingram, J. (2007). The design of everyday life. Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuller, J. (1991). Cleanliness has only recently become a virtue + the history of bathing and hygiene. Smithsonian, 21(11), 126–&.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Theatrical improvisation: Lessons for organizations. Organization Studies, 25(5), 727–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J., Stolterman, E., & Forlizzi, J. (2010). An analysis and critique of research through design: Towards a formalization of a research approach. In Paper presented at the DIS2010, Aarhus Denmark.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank all those innumerable advisors, students and participants that have been involved in the splash projects, Delft University of Technology for hosting it and the FP7 and NWE frameworks for funding it.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lenneke Kuijer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kuijer, L. (2017). Splashing: The Iterative Development of a Novel Type of Personal Washing. In: Keyson, D., Guerra-Santin, O., Lockton, D. (eds) Living Labs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33527-8_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33527-8_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33526-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33527-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics