Abstract
This chapter describes a case study on personal washing that was developed in association with two subsequent Living Lab projects. Drawing on theories of practice, the case study explored the application of a practices-oriented approach to reducing household resource consumption. Personal washing was taken as a target practice because of its high and growing water and energy consumption. The case study used an iterative process to develop a feasible, but highly less resource intensive alternative to the dominant practice of showering in the Netherlands. Splashing emerged as a promising proto-practice from subsequent performances, both in the lab and the field.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The FP7 LivingLab project and the SusLabNWE project related to a PhD research conducted at the Department of Industral Design at Delft University of Technology.
- 2.
- 3.
It has to be noted that the environmental impact of a shower derives primarily from the energy required to heat the water, but in this study the amount of water is used as a proxy for the combined resource use of water and energy to heat the water.
- 4.
This is an estimation assuming a daily flannel wash using the 5 l ‘lampet’ (jug and basin) and a weekly bath of 50 l.
- 5.
References
Bakker, C., van Eijk, D., Silvester, S., Reitenbach, M., de Jong, A., & Keyson, D. (2010). Understanding and modelling user behaviour in relation to sustainable innovations: The LIVING LAB method. Ancona, Italy: Paper presented at the TMCE.
Bushman, R., & Bushman, C. (1988). The early history of cleanliness in America. Journal of American History, 74(4), 1213–1238.
Chopp, C. (2012). A bucket a day, keeps the dirt away: A guide to bucket baths. Full Stop India, Tips and Advise From a Western Traveler, 2012. http://www.fullstopindia.com/a-bucket-a-day-keeps-the-dirt-away-a-guide-to-bucket-baths.
Correlje, A., & Verbong, G. (2004). The transition from coal to gas: radical change of the Dutch gas system. System innovation and the transition to sustainability: theory, evidence and policy (pp. 114–134). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Foekema, H., & van Thiel, L. (2011). Watergebruik thuis 2010. Amsterdam: TNS NIPO, in opdracht van VEWIN.
Henny, F. (2013). Implementation of a new bathing practice. (Master). Delft: Delft University of Technology.
Hand, M., Shove, E., & Southerton, D. (2005). Explaining showering: A discussion of the material, conventional, and temporal dimensions of practice. Sociological Research Online, 10(2).
Ingram, J., Shove, E., & Watson, M. (2007). Products and practices: Selected concepts from science and technology studies and from social theories of consumption and practice. Design Issues, 23(2), 3–16.
Karakat, H. (2009). Designing for alternative (sustainable) bathing practices. (MSc). Delft: Delft University of Technology. Retrieved from http://repository.tudelft.nl/view/ir/uuid:bda7a61d-2a45-4bd7-9979-25fc611ce55d/.
Kira, A. (1976). The bathroom. New York: Viking press.
Knupfer, L. (2011). An alternative bathing practice for sustainable renovation. (MSc thesis). Delft: Delft University of Technology. Retrieved from http://repository.tudelft.nl/view/ir/uuid%3Ab9db7836-66b2-4745-bdab-c3aef0f1a2dd/.
Kuijer, L. (2014). Implications of Social Practice Theory for Sustainable Design.
Kuijer, L., & Bakker, C. (2015). Of chalk and cheese: behaviour change and practice theory in sustainable design. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering (ahead-of-print), 1–12.
Kuijer, L., de Jong, A., & Van Eijk, D. (2013). Practices as a unit of design: An exploration of theoretical guidelines in a study on bathing. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20(4), 22.
Kuijer, L., & de Jong, A. (2009). A practice oriented approach to user centred sustainable design. In Paper presented at the Sixth International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing Sapporo, Japan.
Kuijer, L., McHardy, J., & Scott, K. (2010). The challenge of the bucket wash: creating desirable sustainable practices. In Paper presented at the 7th International Conference on Design and Emotion, Chicago.
Matsuhashi, N., Kuijer, L., & de Jong, A. (2009). A culture-inspired approach to gaining insights for designing sustainable practices. In Paper presented at the EcoDesign 2009: Sixth International Symposium on Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing Sapporo, Japan.
Moel, P. J., Verberk, J. Q., & Van Dijk, J. (2006). Drinking water: principles and practices. Singapore: World Scientific.
Reckwitz, A. (2002a). The status of the “material” in theories of culture: From “social structure” to “artefacts”. Journal for the Theory of Social B, 32(2), 195–217.
Reckwitz, A. (2002b). Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(2), 243–263. doi:10.1177/136843102222225432.
Rohles, H. (1980). Temperature or temperament: A psychologist looks at thermal comfort. ASHRAE Transactions, 86(1), 5–13.
Schatzki, T. (1996). Social practices: A wittgensteinian aproach to human activity and the social. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schatzki, T., Cetina, C. K., & von Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London and New York: Routledge.
Scott, K., Quist, J., & Bakker, C. (2009). Co-design, social practices and sustainable innovation: involving users in a living lab exploratory study on bathing. Aalborg, Denmark: Paper presented at the joint actions on climate change conference.
Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. London: Sage.
Shove, E., & Watson, M. (2006). Manifesto of practice oriented product design. http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/projects/dnc/papers.html. Retrieved 06 Aug 2008.
Shove, E., Watson, M., Hand, M., & Ingram, J. (2007). The design of everyday life. Berg.
Stuller, J. (1991). Cleanliness has only recently become a virtue + the history of bathing and hygiene. Smithsonian, 21(11), 126–&.
Vera, D., & Crossan, M. (2004). Theatrical improvisation: Lessons for organizations. Organization Studies, 25(5), 727–749.
Zimmerman, J., Stolterman, E., & Forlizzi, J. (2010). An analysis and critique of research through design: Towards a formalization of a research approach. In Paper presented at the DIS2010, Aarhus Denmark.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank all those innumerable advisors, students and participants that have been involved in the splash projects, Delft University of Technology for hosting it and the FP7 and NWE frameworks for funding it.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kuijer, L. (2017). Splashing: The Iterative Development of a Novel Type of Personal Washing. In: Keyson, D., Guerra-Santin, O., Lockton, D. (eds) Living Labs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33527-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33527-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33526-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33527-8
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)