Advertisement

Living Labs pp 297-308 | Cite as

Powerchord: Exploring Ambient Audio Feedback on Energy Use

  • Dan LocktonEmail author
  • Flora Bowden
  • Claire Matthews
Chapter

Abstract

Influencing energy use is a major research topic. However, many approaches lump ‘energy demand’ together, disconnected from everyday artefacts, the realities of household life, and people’s diverse understandings of the systems around them. There is an opportunity for research through design which addresses relationships with the invisible concept of energy through new kinds of feedback. Powerchord is an ongoing (2014—) exploration of sonifying energy use in near-real time. The prototypes developed so far monitor multiple household electrical appliances in parallel, turning readings of the instantaneous power being drawn into various kinds of sounds. Powerchord provides a form of ambient experiential feedback intended to fit with the soundscapes of everyday domestic life, while (perhaps) enabling a deeper understanding of the characteristics of energy use. The concept was developed from ideas suggested by householders during co-creation sessions as part of the European SusLabNWE project, funded by INTERREG IVB, as part of our wider exploration of the invisibility of energy which also led to ‘Drawing Energy’ (see Chap.  14 ‘Participatory Drawing in Ethnographic Research’).

Keywords

Energy use Sonification Ubiquitous computing 

References

  1. Attari, S. Z., DeKay, M. L., Davidson, C. I., & Bruine de Bruin, W. (2010). Public perceptions of energy consumption and savings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(37), 16054–16059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boucher, A., Cameron, D., & Jarvis, N. (2012). Power to the people: Dynamic energy management through communal cooperation. In Proceedings of DIS 2012, Newcastle.Google Scholar
  3. Bowden, F., Lockton, D., Gheerawo, R., & Brass, C. (2015). Drawing energy: Exploring perceptions of the invisible. London: Royal College of Art.Google Scholar
  4. Brynjarsdóttir, H., Håkansson, M., Pierce, J., Baumer, E. P. S., DiSalvo, C., & Sengers, P. (2012). Sustainably unpersuaded: How persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability. In Proceedings of CHI 2012, Austin, Texas.Google Scholar
  5. Dourish, P. (2001). What we talk about when we talk about context. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8(1), 19–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ernevi, A., Palm, S., & Redström, J. (2007). Erratic appliances and energy awareness. Knowledge, Technology and Policy, 20(1), 71–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fantini van Ditmar, D., & Lockton, D. (2016). Taking the code for a walk. Interactions, 23(1), 68–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fogg, B. J. (2009). A behavior model for persuasive design, Persuasive 2009. In 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology. New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  9. Foster, D., Linehan, C., Lawson, S., & Kirman, B. (2011). Power ballads: Deploying aversive energy feedback in social media. In CHI ‘11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  10. Goodhew, J., Pahl, S., Auburn, T., & Goodhew, S. (2015). Making heat visible: Promoting energy conservation behaviours through thermal imaging. Environment and Behaviour, 47(10), 1059–1088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gustafsson, A., & Gyllenswärd, M. (2005). The power-aware cord: Energy awareness through ambient information display. In Poster Proceedings of CHI 2005. New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  12. Hargreaves, T., Nye, M., & Burgess, J. (2013). Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term. Energy Policy, 52, 126–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kempton, W., & Montgomery, L. (1982). Folk quantification of energy. Energy Policy, 7(10), 817–827.Google Scholar
  14. Kobus, C. B. A., Mugge, R., & Schoormans, J. P. L. (2012). Washing when the sun is shining! How householders interact with a household energy management system. Ergonomics, 56(3), 451–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lockton, D., Harrison, D., Cain, R., Stanton, N. A., & Jennings, P. (2013). Exploring problem-framing through behavioural heuristics. International Journal of Design, 7(1), 37–53.Google Scholar
  16. Lockton, D., Renström, S., Bowden, F., Rahe, U., Brass, C., & Gheerawo, R. (2014) Energy storytelling through annotating everyday life. In BEHAVE 2014: 3rd European Conference on Behaviour and Energy Efficiency, 3–4 Sept 2014, Oxford.Google Scholar
  17. Mazé, R., & Redström, J. (2008). Switch! Energy ecologies in everyday life. International Journal of Design, 2(3), 55–70.Google Scholar
  18. Pierce, J., & Paulos, E. (2010). Materializing energy. In Proceedings of DIS Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. Arhus, Denmark. DIS ’10. New York, NY: ACM Press.Google Scholar
  19. Revell, K. M. A., & Stanton, N. A. (2014). Case studies of mental models in home heat control: Searching for feedback, valve, timer and switch theories. Applied Ergonomics, 45(3), 363–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schafer, R. M. (1977). The soundscape: Our sonic environment and the tuning of the world. Rochester, VT: Destiny Books.Google Scholar
  21. Serafin, S., Franinovic, K., Hermann, T., Lemaitre, G., Rinott, M., & Rocchesso, D. (2011). Sonic interaction design. In T. Hermann, A. Hunt, & J. G. Neuhoff (Eds.), The sonification handbook (pp. 87–110). Berlin: Logos.Google Scholar
  22. Strengers, Y. (2011). Designing eco-feedback systems for everyday life. In Proceedings of CHI 2011, Vancouver.Google Scholar
  23. Tinjum, A., & Ben-Meshulam, Y. (2013). This is the sound of Chicago’s energy consumption. Opower blog, 20 Nov 2013. http://blog.opower.com/2013/11/power-rock-this-is-the-sound-of-chicagos-energy-consumption/.
  24. Tünnermann, R., Hammerschmidt, J., & Hermann, T. (2013). Blended sonification: Sonification for casual information interaction. In Proceedings of International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD2013), Łódź, Poland.Google Scholar
  25. van Dam, S., Bakker, C. A., & van Hal, J. D. M. (2009). The mediating role of home energy management systems. In Proceedings of First European Conference on Energy Efficiency and Behaviour, Maastricht.Google Scholar
  26. Walker, B. N., & Nees, M. A. (2011). Theory of sonification. In T. Hermann, A. Hunt, & J. G. Neuhoff (Eds.), The sonification handbook (pp. 9–39). Berlin: Logos.Google Scholar
  27. Weiser, M., & Brown, J. S. (1995). Designing calm technology. http://www.ubiq.com/hypertext/weiser/calmtech/calmtech.htm.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Royal College of ArtLondonUK
  2. 2.IndependentLondonUK

Personalised recommendations