Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Emergence of Living Lab Methods

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Living Labs

Abstract

Innovative sustainable solutions in living and working setups need to embrace users’ appropriation of technologies in their daily life practices. Successful innovation scenarios implicate adaptability in technologies for users to engage in a process in which technology and practices are adapted, and even new practices are adopted as result of the appropriation. Sustainability Living Lab (SLL) offers a socio-technical infrastructure to support user-centric innovation processes for the development and adoption of sustainable solutions. It offers a collaborative platform where professionals from different disciplines work together with future users and public and private stakeholders to generate solutions that are rooted in the dynamics of daily life practices. Future users play an active role in generating and applying contextualized practice-based knowledge in the innovation process. Central in the process is the integration of users’ experiences and sustainability impact of their practices around technology appropriation. A new generation of in-situ and mixed methods is emerging to facilitate this process. This chapter introduces an integrated approach based on in-situ and mixed methods to systemize the integration of objective and subjective aspects of daily life practices at different stages of the innovation process. Three levels of integration are described with each addressing different needs and abilities of the professionals, clients and future users involved in such projects. Each level suggests specific involvement of monitoring and self-reporting activities with outcomes that varies from describing behaviours, explaining the factors that influence behaviours as well as their impact, and experimenting on alternative behaviours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barrett, L., & Barrett, D. (2001). An introduction to computerized experience sampling in psychology. Social Science Computer Review, 19, 175–185 (Sage Publications).

    Google Scholar 

  • Budweg, S., Schaffers, H., Ruland, R., Kristensen, K., & Prinz, W. (2011). Enhancing collaboration in communities of professionals using a Living Lab approach. Production Planning and Control, 22(5–6), 594–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, T. C., Barrett, L. F., & Bliss-Moreau, E. (2003). A practical guide to experience-sampling procedures. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4, 53–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Consolvo, S., Harrison, B., Smith, I., Chen, M., Everitt, K., Froehlich, J., & Landay, J. (2006). Conducting in situ evaluations for and with ubiquitous computing technologies. Journal of Human Computer Interactions, 22, 107–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J., & Piano, V. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, A. M., Bakker, C. A., & Scott, K. (2008). The Living Lab project; user centered sustainable design. Sustainable Innovation 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Moor, K., Ketyko, I., Joseph, W., & Deryckere, T. (2010). Proposed framework for evaluating quality of experience in a mobile, testbed-oriented living lab setting. Mobile Networks and Applications, 15(3), 378–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dourish, P. (2003). The appropriation of interactive technologies: Some lessons from placeless documents. Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 12(4), 465–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, M., Niitamo, V. P., & Kulkki, S. (2005). State-of-the-art in utilizing Living Labs approach to user-centric ICT innovation-a European approach. Lulea: Center for Distance-spanning Technology. Lulea: Lulea University of Technology Sweden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hektner, J. M., Schmidt, J.A., & Czikszentmihalyi, M. (2007). Experience sampling method: measuring the quality of everyday life. Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, J., & Ogonowski, C. (2010). Steps toward a living lab for socialmedia concept evaluation and continuous user-involvement. Proceedings of the 8th international interactive conference on Interactive TV and Video (pp. 171–174). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Intille, S. S., Tapia, E. M., Rondoni, J., Beaudin, J., Kukla, C., & Agarwal, S., et al. (2003). Tools for studying behavior and technology in natural settings. Proceedings of Ubicomp’03. (pp. 738–739). ACM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Krueger, A. B., Schkade, D. A., Schwarz, N., & Stone, A. A. (2004). A survey method for characterizing daily life experience: The day reconstruction method. Science, 306(5702), 1776–1780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaseva, V., Seffah, A., & Porras, J. (2015). A social-media-based living lab: an incubator for human-centric software engineering and innovation. Presented at the ICSSP 2015: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Software and System Process (pp. 194–198). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keyson, D., Almahmud, A., & Romero, N. (2013) Living Lab and research on sustainability: Practical approaches on sustainable interaction design. Proceedings of International Conference of Ambient Intelligence Ami’13. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, V. J., Markopoulos, P., Eggen, B., IJsselsteijn, W., & de Ruyter, B. (2008). Reconexp: A way to reduce the data loss of the experiencing sampling method. Proceedings of the 10th international conference MobileHCI (pp. 471–476). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krogstie, J., Stålbrøst, A., Holst, M., & Gudmundsdottir, A. (2013). Using a Living Lab Methodology for Developing Energy Savings Solutions. Proceedings of AMCIS 2013. AISEL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krogstie, J. (2012). Bridging Research and Innovation by Applying Living Labs for Design Science Research. Nordic Contributions in IS Research (pp. 161–176). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1983). The experience sampling method. New directions for methodology of social and behavioral science, 15, 41–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedtke, C., von Geibler, J., and Baedeker, C. (2012a). The sustainability living lab as a reflective user-integrating research infrastructure. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Sustainability Transitions (pp. 206–222).

    Google Scholar 

  • Liedtke, C., Welfens, M. J., Rohn, H., & Nordmann, J. (2012b). LIVING LAB: User-driven innovation for sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13(2), 106–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mensink, W., Birrer, F., & Dutilleul, B. (2010). Unpacking European Living Labs: analysing innovation’s social dimensions. Central European journal of public policy, 4(1), 60–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, I., Hofte, Ter, G. H., & Kort, J. (2005). SocioXensor: Measuring user behaviour and user eXperience in conteXt with mobile devices. In Proceedings of Measuring Behavior (pp. 355–358).

    Google Scholar 

  • Myin-Germeys, I., Oorschot, M., Collip, D., Lataster, J., Deles-paul, P., & Van Os, J. (2009). Experience sampling research in psychopathology: Opening the black box of daily life. Psychological Medicine, 39, 1533–1547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2001) Embedded, everywhere: A research agenda for networked systems of embedded computers. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niitamo, V. P., Kulkki, S., & Eriksson, M. (2006). State-of-the-art and good practice in the field of living labs. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising: Innovative Products and Services through Collaborative Networks (pp. 26–28).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogonowski, C., Ley, B., Hess, J., Wan, L., & Wulf, V. (2013). Designing for the living room: long-term user involvement in a living lab. Proceedings of CHI’13 (pp. 1539–1548). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallot, M., and Pawar, K. (2012). A holistic model of user experience for living lab experiential design. Proceedings of the 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (pp. 1–15). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Senach, B., Scapin, D. (2010). Living Lab research land-scape: From user centred design and user experience towards user co-creation. First European Summer School “Living Labs”, Aug 2010, Paris, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rek, M., Romero, N., Jimenez Garcia, J., & van Boeijen, A. (2013) Motivation to Self-report: Capturing user experiences in field studies. Proceedings of CLIHC’13. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, N., Almahmud, A., Beella, S. & Keyson, D. (2013) Towards an Integrated Methodology to Design Sustainable Living Practices. Proceedings of International Conference of Ambient Intelligence Ami’13. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roto, V., Law, E., Vermeeren, A., & Hoonhout, J. (2011). White paper (Eds): User experience white paper. Outcome of the Dagstuhl Seminar on Demarcating User Experience, 39, 1161–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuurman, D., Lievens, B., De Marez, L., & Ballon, P. (2012). Towards optimal user involvement in innovation processes: A panel-centered Living Lab-approach (pp. 2046–2054). IEEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, T., Stevens, G., & Jakobi, T. (2014). What people do with consumption feedback: A long-term living lab study of a home energy management system. Interacting with Computers, 27(6), 551–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scollon, C., Kim Prieto, C., & Diener, E. (2003). Experience sampling: Promises and pitfalls, strengths and weaknesses. Journal of Happiness Studies, 4(2003), 5–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, K., Quist, J., & Bakker, C. (2009). Co-design, social practices and sustainable innovation: involving users in a living lab exploratory study on bathing. Proceedings of Joint Actions on Climate Change Conference (pp. 8–9).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vastenburg, N., & Romero, N. (2010). Adaptive experience sampling: Addressing the dynamic nature of in-situ user studies. Proceedings of ISAmI International Symposium on Ambient Intelligence (Vol. 72/2010, pp. 197–200). Springer Advances in Soft Computing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veeckman, C., & van der Graaf, S. (2015). The city as Living Laboratory: Empowering citizens with the citadel toolkit. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(3), 6–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The development of the Mixed approach has been funded by the SusLabNWE Interreg European program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Delft University of Technology, Delft, Netherlands

    Natalia Romero Herrera

Authors
  1. Natalia Romero Herrera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalia Romero Herrera .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Industrial Design, Delft University of Technology, Delft, Zuid-Holland, The Netherlands

    David V. Keyson

  2. Faculty of Industrial Design, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Olivia Guerra-Santin

  3. School of Design, Royal College of Art, London, United Kingdom

    Dan Lockton

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Romero Herrera, N. (2017). The Emergence of Living Lab Methods. In: Keyson, D., Guerra-Santin, O., Lockton, D. (eds) Living Labs. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33527-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33527-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33526-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33527-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation