Advertisement

Governing Internet Expression: An Introduction

  • Ben Wagner
Chapter
Part of the Law, Governance and Technology Series book series (LGTS, volume 28)

Abstract

Why should anyone care about freedom of expression? Why does it matter that individuals have the ability to speak their mind uninhibited? What inherent value can be found in the seeking, receiving and imparting of information that would cause any society to raise it to the level of a human right? And why should the story and its subsequent narration in modern liberal thought raise the value of free expression to a value worth dying for? Why does speech matter? This chapter sketches out the larger argument being made in this book and argues that free expression, technology and power are deeply interlinked and that only be understanding these linkages can we make sense of freedom of expression online.

Keywords

Free Speech Speech Space Content Regulation Free Expression Legitimacy Theatre 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Barlow, John. 1996. A declaration of the independence of cyberspace.Google Scholar
  2. Barnouw, Erik. 1970. A history of broadcasting in the United States: The image empire: Volum Iii – from 1953 (Google eBook). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Belavusau, Uladzislau. 2011. Freedom of expression: European and American constitutional models for Central and Eastern Europe. Florence: Department of Law, European University Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Bhabha, Homi K. 1990. DissemiNation: Time, narrative and the margins of the modern nation. In Nation and narration, 333. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Chun, Wendy Hui Kyong. 2006. Control and freedom : Power and paranoia in the age of fiber optics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Crossley, Nick. 2004. After Habermas : New perspectives on the public sphere. Oxford: Blackwell Pub. Sociological Review.Google Scholar
  7. Curtis, Michael Kent. 2000. Free speech, “The people’s darling privilege”: Struggles for freedom of expression in American history. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dahlgren, Peter. 2005. The Internet, public spheres, and political communication: Dispersion and deliberation. Political Communication 22(2): 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de la Chapelle, Bertrand. 2007. Multi-stakeholder governance – Emergence and transformational potential of a new political paradigm. In Managing complexity: Insights, concepts, applications, ed. Helbing Dirk. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Denardis, Laura. 2012, September. Hidden levers of internet control. Information, Communication & Society 15: 37–41.Google Scholar
  11. Doria, Avri, and Wolfgang Kleinwächter. 2008. Internet governance forum (IGF): The first two years. Geneva: Internet Governance Forum.Google Scholar
  12. Drezner, Daniel. 2007. All politics is global: Explaining international regulatory regimes. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Elkins, Z., and B. Simmons. 2004, January. The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international political economy. American Political Science Review 98: 171–189.Google Scholar
  14. Farrand, Benjamin. 2011. The Pan-European licensing of digital music: The effect of the harmonisation of copyright and the role of collecting societies. Florence: European University Institute.Google Scholar
  15. Fraser, Nancy. 1990. Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. Social Text (25/26): 56–80.Google Scholar
  16. Goldsmith, Jack L., and Tim Wu. 2006. Who controls the Internet? Illusions of a borderless world. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Green, Jonathon, and Nicholas J. Karolides. 2005. The Encyclopedia of censorship. Rev. ed. New York: Facts On File.Google Scholar
  18. Habermas, Jürgen. 1962. Strukturwandel Der Öffentlichkeit: Untersuchungen Zu Einer Kategorie Der Bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Neuwied Berlin: Luchterhand.Google Scholar
  19. Hazlett, Thomas, and David W. Sosa. 1997. Chilling the Internet? : Lessons from FCC regulation of radio broadcasting. Policy ana. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
  20. Hoffmann-Riem, Wolfgang. 1996. Regulating media: The licensing and supervision of broadcasting in six countries. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hurst, Steve. 2005. Cold War US foreign policy: Key perspectives. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Jiang, Min. 2010. Authoritarian informationalism: China’s approach to internet sovereignty. SAIS Review 30(2): 71–89.Google Scholar
  23. Jones, Derek. 2001. Censorship: A world encyclopedia. London: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Klang, Mathias. 2006. Disruptive technology: Effects of technology regulation on democracy. Göteborg: Department of Applied Information Technology, Göteborg University.Google Scholar
  25. Landes, Joan B. 1988. Women and the public sphere: In the age of French revolution. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  26. La Rue, Frank. 2011. Report of the special rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression, Frank La Rue to the U.N. Human Rights Council [A/HRC/14/23]. Geneva: United Nations.Google Scholar
  27. Mark, Graham, and Stuart Rossiter Trust Fund. 2000. British censorship of civil mails during World War I, 1914–1919. Bristol: Stuart Rossiter Trust Fund.Google Scholar
  28. McCarthy, Daniel R. 2011. Open networks and the open door: American foreign policy and the narration of the Internet. Foreign Policy Analysis 7(1): 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Meyer, John W., John Boli, George M. Thomas, and Francisco O. Ramirez. 1997. World society and the nation-state. American Journal of Sociology 103(1): 144–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mueller, Milton. 1998. Universal service: Competition, interconnection and monopoly in the making of the American telephone system. Liverpool: Aei Press.Google Scholar
  31. Mueller, Milton. 2010. Networks and states: The global politics of Internet governance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Padovani, C. 2005. WSIS and Multi-Stakeholderism. D. Stauffacher und W. Kleinwächter (Hg.): The World ….Google Scholar
  33. Peters, John Durham. 2005. Courting the abyss: Free speech and the liberal tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pieterse, Jan Nederveen. 2009. Globalization & culture: Global Mélange (Google eBook). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  35. Price, Byron. 1942. Governmental censorship in war-time. The American Political Science Review 36(5): 837–849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Puddephatt, Andrew, Lisa Horner, and Dixie Hawtin. 2010. Information and communication technologies and human rights. Brussels: European Parliament.Google Scholar
  37. Rhoads, C., and F. Fassihi. 2011. Iran Vows to Unplug Internet. Wall Street Journal.Google Scholar
  38. Saxonhouse, A. 2006. Free speech and democracy in ancient Athens. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Tomlinson, John. 1991. Cultural imperialism: A critical introduction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Trager, Robert, and Donna L. Dickerson. 1999. Freedom of expression in the 21st century. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
  41. Warburton, Nigel. 2009. Free speech: A very short introduction (very short introductions). Oxford: OUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Werbach, K. D. 2008. The centripetal network: How the internet holds itself together, and the forces tearing it apart. papers.ssrn.com.Google Scholar
  43. Wu, Tim. 2010. The master switch: The rise and fall of information empires, 1st ed. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ben Wagner
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Internet & Human RightsEuropean University ViadrinaFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations